From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C65C433FE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC026120A for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236624AbhIIOvu (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:51:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:57365 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232557AbhIIOvr (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:51:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631199037; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u9JDbGLr6dkNUoEd0zlqfw7GomTfOIulFrb+2DtUYJA=; b=TK2t5IbPYZj/gw6KLztcMFceqfxMxjg53VpI+ZiHpHPPiiZwLxODHLE6m+GJbw7VhbHh4P oq0jYSUEZaHtFf1V4FtzL/d4QbRsxVWCl+LvZi1KUkt1NhAIWXqQoHQk/8bAifnKgjarqn +e1g95TSHpzS0XxVSzPRwCd6lVb2Y8I= Received: from mail-io1-f71.google.com (mail-io1-f71.google.com [209.85.166.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-599-n_6373_XMze3i20qtu_BsA-1; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 10:48:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: n_6373_XMze3i20qtu_BsA-1 Received: by mail-io1-f71.google.com with SMTP id s22-20020a5e98160000b02905afde383110so2090638ioj.8 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:48:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u9JDbGLr6dkNUoEd0zlqfw7GomTfOIulFrb+2DtUYJA=; b=N69eJdo1GAInUH7mkcS/Q0LtK0JlWUCpmtuIiAs2OP1N2s3ZV/MJgfwH2hbxGC3Zhr H/4oiyHJ57YC/nnMrhSRLX47X5JPFJps64ogrOPvSgZ2Hz2BUTBY0pUjaEzXfG8ePMC8 4Y0Vum42IQ1gA+lR3Jz1WDNJuWBtrkiFOLRCWZce2aZCP6g8DbFcfGzxbcrHEmiuzxA3 FOSrQ1L6JGZ7UL2f9d/A9XNZjgxgODPGz/iaaccWrXvtB7SUflyqgkA6WqTAWhOX5I4u jns+4yUOhzUyGH95p4RBfBQ3vCZgglTnQWK6wkLoaB8BKX77M6qmo4DUYhrAa2FBW2uI av0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AZTps/HwikJs75W9gzIpJ0b5ov8x15sVo2o7EjNyUx+SD/qXz Xfr4Y2xl71m70UdCZfmO2hjkw1dZ+GHCTxTw+RAgwG2eGVarIqiACcRslVr5vzgfqfabh/qo5Ma zZPLTes5nIYOxIbPP4ZcasrW8EUfJsA1BFk5uKqqS X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3f02:: with SMTP id m2mr2975590ioa.136.1631198929421; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:48:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzG1bHzR6MK4Ss51+mBC39dYSC8m50NMcEX5BeZwpBtCi4rKCrXEQfCjjQYKDJ4jPW6l0G3Uz+rBGHTewBW09Y= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3f02:: with SMTP id m2mr2975576ioa.136.1631198929227; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:48:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210909092846.18217-1-ihuguet@redhat.com> <5233eedf-42a7-f938-67cd-e7acc5f3bbce@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5233eedf-42a7-f938-67cd-e7acc5f3bbce@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?w43DsWlnbyBIdWd1ZXQ=?= Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:48:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues To: Edward Cree Cc: habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com, "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:39 PM Edward Cree wrote: > Patches LGTM, thanks for working on this. > > However, I would like to grumble a bit about process: firstly I would > have thought this was more net-next than net material. I intended to send it for net-next, but by mistake I tagged it as net. Sorry, my fault. > Secondly and more importantly, I would really have liked to have had > more than 72 minutes to review this before it was applied. Dave, I > realise you never sleep, but the rest of us occasionally have to :P I go to sleep now too, or at least rest a bit :-P --=20 =C3=8D=C3=B1igo Huguet