From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752559AbaIJX6b (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:58:31 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:48253 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752463AbaIJX63 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:58:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y4trhwqr.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1409670180-17352-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <20140902162146.GA28741@infradead.org> <5405EF38.60007@kernel.dk> <20140903121902.7a9f5a5a@tom-ThinkPad-T410> <87bnquk4fe.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <878ulyjn23.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <87y4trhwqr.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:58:27 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments From: Ming Lei To: Rusty Russell Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kick In , Chris J Arges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: > Rusty Russell writes: >> Rusty Russell writes: >> Here's what I have. It seems to work as expected, but I haven't >> benchmarked it. > > Hi Ming, > > Any chance you can run your benchmarks against this patch? I can run the previous benchmark against this patch, but I am wondering if it is enough since the change need lots of test cases to verify. BTW, looks your patch doesn't against upstream kernel, since I can't find alloc_indirect() in drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c Thanks,