From: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@kinvolk.io>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] seccomp: Add wait_killable semantic to seccomp user notifier
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 14:48:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACaBj2bfJTgC1AW7XmG76iXa2-=5A2phi5bWfDmvd0PNRpe1OQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202204291120.428EB85@keescook>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 8:20 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 05:14:37PM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:42:15AM +0200, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 4:32 AM Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me> wrote:
> > > > the concept is searchable. If the notifying process is signaled prior
> > > > to the notification being received by the userspace agent, it will
> > > > be handled as normal.
> > >
> > > Why is that? Why not always handle in the same way (if wait killable
> > > is set, wait like that)
> > >
> >
> > The goal is to avoid two things:
> > 1. Unncessary work - Often times, we see workloads that implement techniques
> > like hedging (Also known as request racing[1]). In fact, RFC3484
> > (destination address selection) gets implemented where the DNS library
> > will connect to many backend addresses and whichever one comes back first
> > "wins".
> > 2. Side effects - We don't want a situation where a syscall is in progress
> > that is non-trivial to rollback (mount), and from user space's perspective
> > this syscall never completed.
> >
> > Blocking before the syscall even starts is excessive. When we looked at this
> > we found that with runtimes like Golang, they can get into a bad situation
> > if they have many (1000s) of threads that are in the middle of a syscall
> > because all of them need to elide prior to GC. In this case the runtime
> > prioritizes the liveness of GC vs. the syscalls.
> >
> > That being said, there may be some syscalls in a filter that need the suggested
> > behaviour. I can imagine introducing a new flag
> > (say SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE) that applies to all states.
> > Alternatively, in one implementation, I put the behaviour in the data
> > field of the return from the BPF filter.
Makes sense, if we need to, we can implement that in the future too.
> I'd add something like the above to the commit log, just to have it
> around.
Yes, please. It was not obvious to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-02 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 2:31 [PATCH v3 0/2] Handle seccomp notification preemption Sargun Dhillon
2022-04-29 2:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] seccomp: Add wait_killable semantic to seccomp user notifier Sargun Dhillon
2022-04-29 9:42 ` Rodrigo Campos
2022-04-29 17:14 ` Sargun Dhillon
2022-04-29 18:20 ` Kees Cook
2022-05-02 12:48 ` Rodrigo Campos [this message]
2022-04-29 18:22 ` Kees Cook
2022-05-02 14:15 ` Rodrigo Campos
2022-05-02 16:04 ` Sargun Dhillon
2022-05-03 14:27 ` Rodrigo Campos
2022-04-29 2:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/seccomp: Add test for wait killable notifier Sargun Dhillon
2022-04-29 18:19 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-29 22:35 ` Sargun Dhillon
2022-04-29 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-04-29 9:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Handle seccomp notification preemption Rodrigo Campos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACaBj2bfJTgC1AW7XmG76iXa2-=5A2phi5bWfDmvd0PNRpe1OQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rodrigo@kinvolk.io \
--cc=alban@kinvolk.io \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).