From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98D9C63798 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D0221741 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GWyVx/7k" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727764AbgKYEnN (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:43:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34050 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725817AbgKYEnN (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:43:13 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x142.google.com (mail-lf1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8DD9C0613D6; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:43:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x142.google.com with SMTP id s27so1280675lfp.5; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:43:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E4hb4wHZhBzjQ7cqxrZiiBsKOdlyx3ZfOpNyB4xO63E=; b=GWyVx/7k+S20N/EwAX+rlkw33fXii3XfJ96sHI4W56nlFiZjZmoRQO9Gg6AiGEj2ZD vd/aoWM2vbqyP/6Yk6Twq+AJ3yz/9iOxQiypKNq+BuhFpdAXHieDgQ8e9crGHYOg7fVh 80daVbyYsUJBvM7TKul33EZ/9KPRRkjruYakgCrYVnXBqpGnH1Yfh1qJykFMI5Rkxglt xdyGWc8d9GoDZtyHxaoc4kkJ2Yh67a7uc0/NkOpxuaTrsixRTw8PNMO4YunxeP35ev2x qgWpOJK+3rhGFWbrF67NmgxDvbhfNDz2k6bFhMDsrHFTYa/qrpoaRgnDBaTZr0m0i2HG IzMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E4hb4wHZhBzjQ7cqxrZiiBsKOdlyx3ZfOpNyB4xO63E=; b=BCoNUaMgc0wMrUtXSKWDOcF7pwEHIG1ccRcSiEmAwshuZSRlzPsQkJQuubTMujyhJA g8ObJ5hR2TNnEjlUaVffbtpgu0YOWl7NI3J0ieVUcQ1j9Xp+avTISVMvMSS0+3gQuvSA /qp+9JvGH3MwMOsnZ1Ik9oavTOvp23zEsVi/9yTl6v0iGR0s7YAReLGUhNIWVNxB2TBS bR4l1hqnXFrWeRH/yFqDj2igaaujxDv7Jek053zTp56AlZp58uQt8TPXo/MbjkOnJ9wa LHmUfSE9CIVxFzryz6jmcinLaZjlyq0ZMcjQSrdY21qENy8BkeMHC2f9mjD4SjnDNPQQ XAIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oRnDMBJ4gRrvs9TyTC6p2fTwRgU4f5hr99HvJiKeEjOV/ks9r Cl1m4DPV8FPfCR630cShDcBlflY3Dn4woC9a0BmoED8c X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrqz7HfSUGc3zpXFkRDOAgxKowk1doVIhm5BrTJAQ4QIBgAgoPoV1fjn5hOF3fXFGvWsKukHZEHUcDADwUThs= X-Received: by 2002:a19:f60e:: with SMTP id x14mr527380lfe.199.1606279391170; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:43:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9a:999:0:b029:97:eac4:b89e with HTTP; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:43:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20201123075658epcms2p5a6237314f7a72a2556545d3f96261c93@epcms2p5> <20201123081940.GA9323@kozik-lap> <20201124141547.GA3316@kozik-lap> From: Bongsu Jeon Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:43:10 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface To: "krzk@kernel.org" Cc: Bongsu Jeon , "kuba@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nfc@lists.01.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/25/20, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > On 11/24/20, krzk@kernel.org wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:05:52PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:55 PM krzk@kernel.org wrote: >>> > > +static enum s3fwrn5_mode s3fwrn82_uart_get_mode(void *phy_id) >>> > > +{ >>> > > + struct s3fwrn82_uart_phy *phy = phy_id; >>> > > + enum s3fwrn5_mode mode; >>> > > + >>> > > + mutex_lock(&phy->mutex); >>> > > + mode = phy->mode; >>> > > + mutex_unlock(&phy->mutex); >>> > > + return mode; >>> > > +} >>> > >>> > All this duplicates I2C version. You need to start either reusing >>> > common >>> > blocks. >>> > >>> >>> Okay. I will do refactoring on i2c.c and uart.c to make common blocks. >>> is it okay to separate a patch for it? >> >> Yes, that would be the best - refactor the driver to split some common >> methods and then in next patch add new s3fwrn82 UART driver. >> >>> > > + >>> > > +static int s3fwrn82_uart_write(void *phy_id, struct sk_buff *out) >>> > > +{ >>> > > + struct s3fwrn82_uart_phy *phy = phy_id; >>> > > + int err; >>> > > + >>> > > + err = serdev_device_write(phy->ser_dev, >>> > > + out->data, out->len, >>> > > + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); >>> > > + if (err < 0) >>> > > + return err; >>> > > + >>> > > + return 0; >>> > > +} >>> > > + >>> > > +static const struct s3fwrn5_phy_ops uart_phy_ops = { >>> > > + .set_wake = s3fwrn82_uart_set_wake, >>> > > + .set_mode = s3fwrn82_uart_set_mode, >>> > > + .get_mode = s3fwrn82_uart_get_mode, >>> > > + .write = s3fwrn82_uart_write, >>> > > +}; >>> > > + >>> > > +static int s3fwrn82_uart_read(struct serdev_device *serdev, >>> > > + const unsigned char *data, >>> > > + size_t count) >>> > > +{ >>> > > + struct s3fwrn82_uart_phy *phy = >>> > > serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev); >>> > > + size_t i; >>> > > + >>> > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { >>> > > + skb_put_u8(phy->recv_skb, *data++); >>> > > + >>> > > + if (phy->recv_skb->len < S3FWRN82_NCI_HEADER) >>> > > + continue; >>> > > + >>> > > + if ((phy->recv_skb->len - S3FWRN82_NCI_HEADER) >>> > > + < >>> > > phy->recv_skb->data[S3FWRN82_NCI_IDX]) >>> > > + continue; >>> > > + >>> > > + s3fwrn5_recv_frame(phy->ndev, phy->recv_skb, >>> > > phy->mode); >>> > > + phy->recv_skb = alloc_skb(NCI_SKB_BUFF_LEN, >>> > > GFP_KERNEL); >>> > > + if (!phy->recv_skb) >>> > > + return 0; >>> > > + } >>> > > + >>> > > + return i; >>> > > +} >>> > > + >>> > > +static struct serdev_device_ops s3fwrn82_serdev_ops = { >>> > >>> > const >>> > >>> > > + .receive_buf = s3fwrn82_uart_read, >>> > > + .write_wakeup = serdev_device_write_wakeup, >>> > > +}; >>> > > + >>> > > +static const struct of_device_id s3fwrn82_uart_of_match[] = { >>> > > + { .compatible = "samsung,s3fwrn82-uart", }, >>> > > + {}, >>> > > +}; >>> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, s3fwrn82_uart_of_match); >>> > > + >>> > > +static int s3fwrn82_uart_parse_dt(struct serdev_device *serdev) >>> > > +{ >>> > > + struct s3fwrn82_uart_phy *phy = >>> > > serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev); >>> > > + struct device_node *np = serdev->dev.of_node; >>> > > + >>> > > + if (!np) >>> > > + return -ENODEV; >>> > > + >>> > > + phy->gpio_en = of_get_named_gpio(np, "en-gpios", 0); >>> > > + if (!gpio_is_valid(phy->gpio_en)) >>> > > + return -ENODEV; >>> > > + >>> > > + phy->gpio_fw_wake = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wake-gpios", 0); >>> > >>> > You should not cast it it unsigned int. I'll fix the s3fwrn5 from >>> > which >>> > you copied this apparently. >>> > >>> >>> Okay. I will fix it. >>> >>> > > + if (!gpio_is_valid(phy->gpio_fw_wake)) >>> > > + return -ENODEV; >>> > > + >>> > > + return 0; >>> > > +} >>> > > + >>> > > +static int s3fwrn82_uart_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev) >>> > > +{ >>> > > + struct s3fwrn82_uart_phy *phy; >>> > > + int ret = -ENOMEM; >>> > > + >>> > > + phy = devm_kzalloc(&serdev->dev, sizeof(*phy), GFP_KERNEL); >>> > > + if (!phy) >>> > > + goto err_exit; >>> > > + >>> > > + phy->recv_skb = alloc_skb(NCI_SKB_BUFF_LEN, GFP_KERNEL); >>> > > + if (!phy->recv_skb) >>> > > + goto err_free; >>> > > + >>> > > + mutex_init(&phy->mutex); >>> > > + phy->mode = S3FWRN5_MODE_COLD; >>> > > + >>> > > + phy->ser_dev = serdev; >>> > > + serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, phy); >>> > > + serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &s3fwrn82_serdev_ops); >>> > > + ret = serdev_device_open(serdev); >>> > > + if (ret) { >>> > > + dev_err(&serdev->dev, "Unable to open device\n"); >>> > > + goto err_skb; >>> > > + } >>> > > + >>> > > + ret = serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, 115200); >>> > >>> > Why baudrate is fixed? >>> > >>> >>> RN82 NFC chip only supports 115200 baudrate for UART. >> >> OK, I guess it could be extended in the future for other frequencies, if >> needed. >> >>> >>> > > + if (ret != 115200) { >>> > > + ret = -EINVAL; >>> > > + goto err_serdev; >>> > > + } >>> > > + >>> > > + serdev_device_set_flow_control(serdev, false); >>> > > + >>> > > + ret = s3fwrn82_uart_parse_dt(serdev); >>> > > + if (ret < 0) >>> > > + goto err_serdev; >>> > > + >>> > > + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&phy->ser_dev->dev, >>> > > + phy->gpio_en, >>> > > + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, >>> > > + "s3fwrn82_en"); >>> > >>> > This is weirdly wrapped. >>> > >>> >>> Did you ask about devem_gpio_request_one function's parenthesis and >>> parameters? >>> If it is right, I changed it after i ran the checkpatch.pl --strict and >>> i saw message like the alignment should match open parenthesis. >> >> Yeah, but it does not mean to wrap after each argument. It should be >> something like: >> >> ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&phy->ser_dev->dev, phy->gpio_en, >> GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "s3fwrn82_en"); >> >>> >>> > > + if (ret < 0) >>> > > + goto err_serdev; >>> > > + >>> > > + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&phy->ser_dev->dev, >>> > > + phy->gpio_fw_wake, >>> > > + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, >>> > > + "s3fwrn82_fw_wake"); >>> > > + if (ret < 0) >>> > > + goto err_serdev; >>> > > + >>> > > + ret = s3fwrn5_probe(&phy->ndev, phy, &phy->ser_dev->dev, >>> > > &uart_phy_ops); >>> > > + if (ret < 0) >>> > > + goto err_serdev; >>> > > + >>> > > + return ret; >>> > > + >>> > > +err_serdev: >>> > > + serdev_device_close(serdev); >>> > > +err_skb: >>> > > + kfree_skb(phy->recv_skb); >>> > > +err_free: >>> > > + kfree(phy); >>> > >>> > Eee.... why? Did you test this code? >>> > >>> >>> I didn't test this code. i just added this code as defense code. >>> If the error happens, then allocated memory and device will be free >>> according to the fail case. >> >> Really, this won't work. It's kind of obvious why... You cannot use >> kfree() on memory which is not allocated with kzalloc(). Or IOW, you >> cannot use it if it is being freed by devm. >> >> I doubt that you tested either this or the remove callback because if >> you did test it, you would see easily: >> > > Thanks to explain it in detail. > >> Please fix the double-free. >> > > I understand it and will remove the kfree(phy). > And i did the remove callback test using following echo command's > parameters on raspberry pi. > But i didn't see the error log like yours. > > Echo serial0-0 > /sys/bus/serial/devices/serial0/serial0-0/driver/unbind > Sorry to reply this email in a row. I could see the log like yours when i changed the code at uart probe functiom to make an error situation by force as below. ret = -EINVAL; // s3fwrn5_probe(~~~ and i couldn't see the log when i removed the kfree(phy). Thanks to mention it. >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> >