From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DA7C433E0 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F5122D6F for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394610AbhARVV6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:21:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57922 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389683AbhARVUQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:20:16 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E45C061757; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id m13so19640028ljo.11; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7Gw9GWK1LY+wiC3xlS1+0EnqCUMmvekAt1MEE2u5Clg=; b=AT1ajz/a3PMJPAUuuNGw3hMwI7o0S4FiZc5V+xlgtrazeF1IJ/dRwjZT6aObPeajwu neZSMBur1kLY+oajIHHdBhAEud61L6V9Qowhyhkgv9PgThd6WO71fqWELaOYHefe1VW9 t9HMUKJQ7v9bYRLiopX/42UsX5GcsgvKK5JeBuoA+OH+ve1UhCNHUdgg9h35zcKFkwfh i0nN9OIBzPgjf3qZCWMbsCirlDwPjT3VLGZnm/a9ykYgZriS9wfxyoqEySeciKPC2Osw zvA18FAISZsIUlD9S9J5llSsJDKSfi4DwGHfL1/OjLZ7FxIGc+xwBROUuxYBKQjqVRXc lCYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7Gw9GWK1LY+wiC3xlS1+0EnqCUMmvekAt1MEE2u5Clg=; b=J64br8y+pUmuVC6ki8CP2xmoFjWdU/u76VY9QtRYlHqkoG3WppWryoqAeOM7wxExKZ Gz/AluWcgLPKzXrI+/lB1TXF7ECAwED731Igt9fGpQRwwMLp5KXwq8Rp5m4gQdrGcKZz 9f+A6+hqunptoRrppVgpEXmhhmrTneKAkDBCLE0DZZimmhmYLJGKIPeNsM+JMbaSjJ7o bwIFFeMGhUXGQDLRE4ldXniT9wyk+Kk6TOWCNmiLgu2XbvDI92my0lHp+aO28rZGK5vd 8Ql+XQWG1d6bJIlfKEMm7prJlCcOhL+fIZICzjqShB7JkDpUYzdibjgU5zkYVtEazaa6 qo+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322yQS+Zc+dbU81JiBh/R70Phivu+tGegQCsGWOHA7XGM5Whf4Y NyLJe8fm8R/+q/Cct8b2b2paatco7YGBcngj5mWSYUjUqGo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzACseCUIk3O93p43wtSe9U6ueEHRh/iRgAn3tf5XogTMtTUYvYgZvbcKMKYf3XErfZk3wMfaQSWQC7BToJatw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:120f:: with SMTP id i15mr583141lja.339.1611004774188; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:19:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210118205522.317087-1-bongsu.jeon@samsung.com> <20210118130154.256b3851@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20210118130154.256b3851@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Bongsu Jeon Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:19:23 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: nfc: nci: fix the wrong NCI_CORE_INIT parameters To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfc@lists.01.org, Bongsu Jeon Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:01 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 05:55:22 +0900 Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > From: Bongsu Jeon > > > > Fix the code because NCI_CORE_INIT_CMD includes two parameters in NCI2.0 > > but there is no parameters in NCI1.x. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon > > What's the Fixes tag for this change? Sorry to miss the Fixes tag. This is the Fixes tag ( Fixes: bcd684aace34 ("net/nfc/nci: Support NCI 2.x initial sequence") ) Could I resend this patch after adding that tag?