linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, khali@linux-fr.org,
	ben-linux@fluff.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:18:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6sgNEqEhiXC_EoBuAg+QaaRis_4eRb7s5k0MKtfZF-3dA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509D0F1F.70001@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Mathias Nyman
<mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 09:38 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ...
>
>>>> +#include<linux/errno.h>
>>>> +#include<linux/gpio.h>
>>>> +#include<linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include<linux/acpi_gpio.h>
>>>> +#include<linux/acpi.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int acpi_gpiochip_find(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       acpi_handle handle = data;
>>>> +       acpi_handle gc_handle;
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (!gc->dev)
>>>> +               return false;
>>>> +
>>>> +       gc_handle = gc->dev->acpi_handle;
>>>> +       if (!gc_handle)
>>>> +               return false;
>>>
>>>
>>> This test is redundant with the next one... unless 'handle' is also NULL
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Is it at all possible for multiple gpiochips to be used for a single
>>> ACPI gpio controller node? Such as if the gpio controller has multiple
>>> banks that should be controlled separately? If so then this won't be
>>> sufficient. I've got the same issue with DT support where the find
>>> function needs to also check if the pin is provided by that specific
>>> gpiochip.
>>
>>
>> AFAIK no but I'll let Mathias to answer that as he knows this better.
>
>
> I'm interpreting it the same way as Mika, max one actual controller per ACPI
> device node
>
> The path (called ResourceSource in ACPI5 specs) in GpioIO/GpioInt resources
> is a "string which uniquely identifies the GPIO controller referred to by
> this descriptor."  The pin number is zero based controller relative.
>
> The  ACPI device controller node includes all other resources needed by the
> controller driver (ioport/mem base, range, interrupt, and Hardware ID used
> to pair with a driver)
>
> Checked a board with two identical gpio controllers on it and it had two
> separate ACPI device node entries. (with only different io address base and
> interrupt resources)

That's not really the situation that I'm thinking about. What I mean
is for a gpio controller that is more convenient for Linux to support
using multiple gpiochips (Linux internal detail), even though there it
is described with a single ACPI node.

g.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-09 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-03  7:46 [PATCH 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-03  7:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 11:53   ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-05 12:14     ` Mathias Nyman
2012-11-05 12:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 13:11         ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-05 13:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 13:28             ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-05 13:50               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 14:40                 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-06  9:39                   ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-06 10:15                     ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-07  8:54                       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-08 15:55   ` Grant Likely
2012-11-08 19:38     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-09 14:11       ` Mathias Nyman
2012-11-09 14:18         ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-11-09 15:05           ` Mathias Nyman
2012-11-09 15:46             ` Grant Likely
2012-11-11  9:50               ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-03  7:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-03 19:42   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-03 20:13     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-03 20:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 10:31         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 10:56           ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 10:56             ` Mark Brown
2012-11-05 12:02               ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 12:23                 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-05 12:59                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 13:15                     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 13:20                       ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-05 13:43                         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 14:03                         ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-05 14:19                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 14:53                             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 15:19                               ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-05 17:12                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 17:43                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-05 18:08                                     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 17:49                                   ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-05 20:42                           ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-06  8:11                 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-05 16:54           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-06 13:43             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-06 20:35               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-06 22:28                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-06 22:36                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-07  9:58                     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-07 11:14                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-07 13:05                         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-08  0:46                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-08 20:20                             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-08 20:54                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-08 18:05                       ` Grant Likely
2012-11-08 21:06                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-08 21:34                           ` Grant Likely
2012-11-05 10:54       ` Mark Brown
2012-11-03 20:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 16:54       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-06 13:16         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-06 20:53           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-06 22:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-07  9:56               ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-08 19:32                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-08 20:04                   ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-09 15:11                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-09 15:45                       ` Grant Likely
2012-11-09 16:35                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-09 16:43                           ` Grant Likely
2012-11-09 16:48                             ` Mark Brown
2012-11-09 16:53                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-10 11:10                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-10 11:16                                 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-10 17:14                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-10 19:40                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-05 10:54   ` Mark Brown
2012-11-05 11:03     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-05 11:13       ` Mark Brown
2012-11-08 18:48   ` Grant Likely
2012-11-09  3:50     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-03  7:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-03 21:52   ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-04  7:23     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-04  8:50       ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-04 10:50         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-08 18:58   ` Grant Likely
2012-11-09  3:51     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-04 18:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Linus Walleij
2012-11-05  9:23   ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] Centralized parsing of ACPI device resources (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-12 12:00   ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Move device resources interpretation code from PNP to ACPI core Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-12 13:27     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-12 20:25       ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-12 12:01   ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / platform: Use common ACPI device resource parsing routines Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-12 12:02   ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: Evaluate _CRS while creating device node objects Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-12 14:46     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-12 21:03       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13  7:12         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-13 12:06           ` [Replacement][PATCH 3/3] Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 14:16             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-13 15:15               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 15:18                 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-13 15:28                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 15:37                     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-13 16:34           ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: Evaluate _CRS while creating device node objects Moore, Robert
2012-11-13 20:44             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 22:06               ` Moore, Robert
2012-11-13 22:56                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-14  2:23                   ` Moore, Robert
2012-11-14  9:18                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-14  9:32                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-14 14:20                         ` Moore, Robert
2012-11-13 20:51   ` [PATCH 0/3 rev 2] Centralized parsing of ACPI device resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 20:55     ` [PATCH 1/3 rev 2] ACPI: Move device resources interpretation code from PNP to ACPI core Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 20:55     ` [PATCH 2/3 rev 2] ACPI / platform: Use common ACPI device resource parsing routines Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-13 20:56     ` [PATCH 3/3 rev 2] ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-14  9:52     ` [PATCH 0/3 rev 2] Centralized parsing " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-14 10:08       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACxGe6sgNEqEhiXC_EoBuAg+QaaRis_4eRb7s5k0MKtfZF-3dA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).