From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753227Ab2A2AkF (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:40:05 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:40488 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751954Ab2A2AkD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:40:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120129003550.GA21385@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1327700179-17454-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1327700179-17454-23-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <20120128164405.GA20763@linutronix.de> <20120129003550.GA21385@ponder.secretlab.ca> From: Grant Likely Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:39:43 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SdGm26ZbWt5vygW76swVvcgkbvc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/25] irq_domain/x86: Convert x86 (embedded) to use common irq_domain To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Gleixner , Milton Miller , Rob Herring , Stephen Rothwell , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 05:44:05PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> * Grant Likely | 2012-01-27 14:36:16 [-0700]: >> >> >This patch removes the x86-specific definition of irq_domain and replaces >> >it with the common implementation. >> >> I pulled your devicetree/next tree. After this patch I get: >> >> |Hierarchical RCU implementation. >> |NR_IRQS:2304 nr_irqs:256 16 >> |------------[ cut here ]------------ >> |WARNING: at /home/bigeasy/work/shiva/git/linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:114 irq_domain_add_legacy+0x75/0x150() >> |Modules linked in: >> |Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.3.0-rc1+ #65 >> |Call Trace: >> | [] ? printk+0x18/0x1a >> | [] warn_slowpath_common+0x6d/0xa0 >> | [] ? irq_domain_add_legacy+0x75/0x150 >> | [] ? irq_domain_add_legacy+0x75/0x150 >> | [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 >> | [] irq_domain_add_legacy+0x75/0x150 >> | [] x86_add_irq_domains+0x96/0xd6 >> | [] init_IRQ+0x8/0x33 >> | [] start_kernel+0x191/0x2e1 >> | [] ? loglevel+0x2b/0x2b >> | [] i386_start_kernel+0x81/0x86 >> |---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]--- >> |------------[ cut here ]------------ >> |kernel BUG at /home/bigeasy/work/shiva/git/linux-2.6-tip/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c:367! >> >> The warning is comming from this piece in irq_domain_add_legacy() >> |for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { >> |                 int irq = first_irq + i; >> |                 struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(irq); >> | >> |                 if (WARN_ON(!irq_data || irq_data->domain)) { >> >> irq_data is NULL here. >> >> |                         mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex); >> |                         of_node_put(domain->of_node); >> |                         kfree(domain); >> |                         return NULL; >> |                 } >> |         } >> | >> >> This is not always the case. arch_early_irq_init() in [0] sets up the >> first 16 entries. The reminaing few (there is a toal of 24 irqs for >> first ioapic and a second ioapic) are not initialized. This happens >> later via ->xlate, ioapic_xlate() => io_apic_setup_irq_pin() => >> alloc_irq_and_cfg_at() calls irq_set_chip_data() on demand. >> >> [0] arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > That's not going to work then.  The irqs must not be set up in ->xlate. > They need to be set up either before creating the irq_domain, or in the > .map hook.  Inside the map hook is preferred, but having some > configured and some not at initialization time does make it difficult Actually, that's still not right. irq_set_chip_data() (sets desc->irq_data.chip_data) has nothing to do with irq_get_irq_data() (which returns desc->irq_data). It's the allocation of the irq_desc that is at issue here. Where does the allocation occur? (I haven't dug in to find it yet) g.