linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongji Xie <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:59:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACycT3tPR30RU8XmWbDA=Hp-A6BBifd-q_aqrmU-9VK=OaRJRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08366773-76b5-be73-7e32-d9ce6f6799bf@redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:05 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/8/9 下午6:16, Xie Yongji 写道:
> > An untrusted device might presents an invalid block size
> > in configuration space. This tries to add validation for it
> > in the validate callback and clear the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE
> > feature bit if the value is out of the supported range.
> >
> > And we also double check the value in virtblk_probe() in
> > case that it's changed after the validation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > index 4b49df2dfd23..afb37aac09e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > @@ -692,6 +692,28 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = {
> >   static unsigned int virtblk_queue_depth;
> >   module_param_named(queue_depth, virtblk_queue_depth, uint, 0444);
> >
> > +static int virtblk_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > +     u32 blk_size;
> > +
> > +     if (!vdev->config->get) {
> > +             dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n",
> > +                     __func__);
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE))
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     blk_size = virtio_cread32(vdev,
> > +                     offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, blk_size));
> > +
> > +     if (blk_size < SECTOR_SIZE || blk_size > PAGE_SIZE)
> > +             __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE);
>
>
> I wonder if it's better to just fail here as what we did for probe().
>

Looks like we don't need to do that since we already clear the
VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE to tell the device that we don't use the block
size in configuration space. Just like what we did in
virtnet_validate().

Thanks,
Yongji

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09 10:16 [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space Xie Yongji
2021-08-10  3:05 ` Jason Wang
2021-08-10  4:59   ` Yongji Xie [this message]
2021-08-10  6:59     ` Jason Wang
2021-08-22 23:17 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23  4:31   ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23  8:07     ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23  8:35       ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23  9:04         ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23  9:27           ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23  9:38             ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 10:33               ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 10:45                 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-23 11:41                   ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 12:13                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-23 12:40                     ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-23 16:02                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-08-23 22:31                     ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-24  2:47                       ` Jason Wang
2021-08-24 10:11                         ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-24 12:52                           ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-24 13:30                             ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-08-24 13:38                               ` Yongji Xie
2021-08-24 13:48                                 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-10-04 15:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-04 15:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 15:52     ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-05 10:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-05 15:45     ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-05 18:26     ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-10-11 11:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 12:21       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-13 12:34         ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-13 12:51           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-13 12:59             ` Yongji Xie
2021-10-05 15:24   ` Yongji Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACycT3tPR30RU8XmWbDA=Hp-A6BBifd-q_aqrmU-9VK=OaRJRg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).