linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.

A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.

This series cleans it up.

First patch is fixing detection of missing '__user' flag by sparse
when using get_user_instr().

Last part of the series does some source code cleanup in
optprobes, it is put at the ends of this series because of
clashes with the 'struct ppc_inst' cleanups.

Changes in v2:
- Temporarily don't use get_op() and don't include asm/disassemble.h in asm/inst.h because it exhibits a conflict for function get_ra() with drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/wifi.h
- Fix a create_branch() in ftrace and take copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault() into account

Christophe Leroy (12):
  powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr()
  powerpc/inst: Reduce casts in get_user_instr()
  powerpc/inst: Improve readability of get_user_instr() and friends
  powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal()
  powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe,
    code-patching, feature-fixups)
  powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static
  powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable
    code in tests.
  powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
  powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions
  powerpc/optprobes: Minimise casts
  powerpc/optprobes: Compact code source a bit.
  powerpc/optprobes: use PPC_RAW_ macros

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h  |  23 ++-
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h           |  92 +++++-------
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h     |  11 +-
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h        |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c          |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c      |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c          |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c                |   6 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c             |  17 ++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c           |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c           | 124 +++++-----------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c            |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c        |  33 +++--
 arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c             |   6 +-
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c          | 165 ++++++++++++----------
 arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c         |  98 ++++++-------
 arch/powerpc/mm/maccess.c                 |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c           |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c     |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c                  |  10 +-
 21 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 340 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 01/12] powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr()
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] powerpc/inst: Reduce casts in get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

get_user_instr() lacks sparse detection for the __user tag.

This is because __gui_ptr is assigned with a cast.

Fix that by adding a __chk_user_ptr()

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
index 268d3bd073c8..887ef150fdda 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
 	unsigned long __gui_ptr = (unsigned long)ptr;			\
 	struct ppc_inst __gui_inst;					\
 	unsigned int __prefix, __suffix;				\
+									\
+	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);						\
 	__gui_ret = gu_op(__prefix, (unsigned int __user *)__gui_ptr);	\
 	if (__gui_ret == 0) {						\
 		if ((__prefix >> 26) == OP_PREFIX) {			\
@@ -29,7 +31,10 @@
 })
 #else /* !CONFIG_PPC64 */
 #define ___get_user_instr(gu_op, dest, ptr)				\
-	gu_op((dest).val, (u32 __user *)(ptr))
+({									\
+	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);						\
+	gu_op((dest).val, (u32 __user *)(ptr));				\
+})
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
 #define get_user_instr(x, ptr) \
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 02/12] powerpc/inst: Reduce casts in get_user_instr()
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] powerpc/inst: Improve readability of get_user_instr() and friends Christophe Leroy
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Declare __gui_ptr as 'unsigned int *' instead of casting it
at each use.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
index 887ef150fdda..57c31e712e67 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -9,16 +9,15 @@
 #define ___get_user_instr(gu_op, dest, ptr)				\
 ({									\
 	long __gui_ret = 0;						\
-	unsigned long __gui_ptr = (unsigned long)ptr;			\
+	unsigned int __user *__gui_ptr = (unsigned int __user *)ptr;	\
 	struct ppc_inst __gui_inst;					\
 	unsigned int __prefix, __suffix;				\
 									\
 	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);						\
-	__gui_ret = gu_op(__prefix, (unsigned int __user *)__gui_ptr);	\
+	__gui_ret = gu_op(__prefix, __gui_ptr);				\
 	if (__gui_ret == 0) {						\
 		if ((__prefix >> 26) == OP_PREFIX) {			\
-			__gui_ret = gu_op(__suffix,			\
-				(unsigned int __user *)__gui_ptr + 1);	\
+			__gui_ret = gu_op(__suffix, __gui_ptr + 1);	\
 			__gui_inst = ppc_inst_prefix(__prefix,		\
 						     __suffix);		\
 		} else {						\
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 03/12] powerpc/inst: Improve readability of get_user_instr() and friends
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] powerpc/inst: Reduce casts in get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal() Christophe Leroy
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Remove unneeded line splits.

And remove unneeded local variable initialisation.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
v2: Don't use get_op() for now as including asm/disassemble.h conflicts with drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/wifi.h
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
index 57c31e712e67..fc6adef528a5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 #define ___get_user_instr(gu_op, dest, ptr)				\
 ({									\
-	long __gui_ret = 0;						\
+	long __gui_ret;							\
 	unsigned int __user *__gui_ptr = (unsigned int __user *)ptr;	\
 	struct ppc_inst __gui_inst;					\
 	unsigned int __prefix, __suffix;				\
@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@
 	if (__gui_ret == 0) {						\
 		if ((__prefix >> 26) == OP_PREFIX) {			\
 			__gui_ret = gu_op(__suffix, __gui_ptr + 1);	\
-			__gui_inst = ppc_inst_prefix(__prefix,		\
-						     __suffix);		\
+			__gui_inst = ppc_inst_prefix(__prefix, __suffix); \
 		} else {						\
 			__gui_inst = ppc_inst(__prefix);		\
 		}							\
@@ -36,11 +35,9 @@
 })
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
-#define get_user_instr(x, ptr) \
-	___get_user_instr(get_user, x, ptr)
+#define get_user_instr(x, ptr) ___get_user_instr(get_user, x, ptr)
 
-#define __get_user_instr(x, ptr) \
-	___get_user_instr(__get_user, x, ptr)
+#define __get_user_instr(x, ptr) ___get_user_instr(__get_user, x, ptr)
 
 /*
  * Instruction data type for POWER
@@ -75,13 +72,12 @@ static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
 
 static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
-	return (ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == 1) && ppc_inst_suffix(x) != 0xff;
+	return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX && ppc_inst_suffix(x) != 0xff;
 }
 
 static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
-	return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)),
-			       swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
+	return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)), swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
 }
 
 static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal()
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] powerpc/inst: Improve readability of get_user_instr() and friends Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  3:38   ` Jordan Niethe
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups) Christophe Leroy
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Avoid casting/dereferencing ppc_inst() as u64* , check each member
of the struct when relevant.

And remove the 0xff initialisation of the suffix for non
prefixed instruction. An instruction with 0xff as a suffix
might be invalid, but still is a prefixed instruction and
has to be considered as this.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
index fc6adef528a5..5a0740ebf132 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_primary_opcode(struct ppc_inst x)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
-#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = 0xff })
+#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x) })
 
 #define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = (y) })
 
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
 
 static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
-	return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX && ppc_inst_suffix(x) != 0xff;
+	return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX;
 }
 
 static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
@@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
-{
-	return *(u64 *)&x == *(u64 *)&y;
-}
-
 #else
 
 #define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = x })
@@ -124,13 +119,17 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
 	return *ptr;
 }
 
+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
+
 static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
 {
-	return ppc_inst_val(x) == ppc_inst_val(y);
+	if (ppc_inst_val(x) != ppc_inst_val(y))
+		return false;
+	if (!ppc_inst_prefixed(x))
+		return true;
+	return ppc_inst_suffix(x) == ppc_inst_suffix(y);
 }
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
-
 static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
 	return ppc_inst_prefixed(x) ? 8 : 4;
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups)
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal() Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  3:41   ` Jordan Niethe
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static Christophe Leroy
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

'struct ppc_inst' is an internal structure to represent an instruction,
it is not directly the representation of that instruction in text code.
It is not meant to map and dereference code.

Dereferencing code directly through 'struct ppc_inst' has two main issues:
- On powerpc, structs are expected to be 8 bytes aligned while code is
spread every 4 byte.
- Should a non prefixed instruction lie at the end of the page and the
following page not be mapped, it would generate a page fault.

In-memory code must be accessed with ppc_inst_read().

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c     | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c  | 8 ++++----
 arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
index 186f69b11e94..46971bb41d05 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
-	    ppc_inst_prefixed(auprobe->insn) &&
+	    ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read(&auprobe->insn)) &&
 	    (addr & 0x3f) == 60) {
 		pr_info_ratelimited("Cannot register a uprobe on 64 byte unaligned prefixed instruction\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 870b30d9be2f..0308429b0d1a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ static unsigned long branch_iform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
 {
 	signed long imm;
 
-	imm = ppc_inst_val(*instr) & 0x3FFFFFC;
+	imm = ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & 0x3FFFFFC;
 
 	/* If the top bit of the immediate value is set this is negative */
 	if (imm & 0x2000000)
 		imm -= 0x4000000;
 
-	if ((ppc_inst_val(*instr) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
+	if ((ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
 		imm += (unsigned long)instr;
 
 	return (unsigned long)imm;
@@ -345,13 +345,13 @@ static unsigned long branch_bform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
 {
 	signed long imm;
 
-	imm = ppc_inst_val(*instr) & 0xFFFC;
+	imm = ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & 0xFFFC;
 
 	/* If the top bit of the immediate value is set this is negative */
 	if (imm & 0x8000)
 		imm -= 0x10000;
 
-	if ((ppc_inst_val(*instr) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
+	if ((ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
 		imm += (unsigned long)instr;
 
 	return (unsigned long)imm;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
index fe26f2fa0f3f..8905b53109bc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int patch_alt_instruction(struct ppc_inst *src, struct ppc_inst *dest,
 
 	instr = ppc_inst_read(src);
 
-	if (instr_is_relative_branch(*src)) {
+	if (instr_is_relative_branch(ppc_inst_read(src))) {
 		struct ppc_inst *target = (struct ppc_inst *)branch_target(src);
 
 		/* Branch within the section doesn't need translating */
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups) Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  3:42   ` Jordan Niethe
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests Christophe Leroy
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

instr_is_branch_to_addr() is only used in code-patching.c

Make it static.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h |  1 -
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c         | 18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
index f1d029bf906e..f9bd1397b696 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static inline int modify_instruction_site(s32 *site, unsigned int clr, unsigned
 
 int instr_is_relative_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
 int instr_is_relative_link_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
-int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr);
 unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr);
 int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *dest,
 		     const struct ppc_inst *src);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 0308429b0d1a..82f2c1edb498 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -367,15 +367,6 @@ unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr)
-{
-	if (instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst_read(instr)) ||
-	    instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst_read(instr)))
-		return branch_target(instr) == addr;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *dest,
 		     const struct ppc_inst *src)
 {
@@ -410,6 +401,15 @@ void __patch_exception(int exc, unsigned long addr)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CODE_PATCHING_SELFTEST
 
+static int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	if (instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst_read(instr)) ||
+	    instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst_read(instr)))
+		return branch_target(instr) == addr;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void __init test_trampoline(void)
 {
 	asm ("nop;\n");
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests.
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  3:42   ` Jordan Niethe
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location Christophe Leroy
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

'struct ppc_inst' is meant to represent an instruction internally, it
is not meant to dereference code in memory.

For testing code patching, use patch_instruction() to properly
write into memory the code to be tested.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 82f2c1edb498..508e9511ca96 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct ppc_inst instr;
-	unsigned long addr;
-
-	addr = (unsigned long)&instr;
+	unsigned int tmp[2];
+	struct ppc_inst *iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)tmp;
+	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)tmp;
 
 	/* The simplest case, branch to self, no flags */
 	check(instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst(0x48000000)));
@@ -445,52 +445,57 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void)
 	check(!instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst(0x7bfffffd)));
 
 	/* Absolute branch to 0x100 */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x48000103);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x100));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x48000103));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x100));
 	/* Absolute branch to 0x420fc */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x480420ff);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x420fc));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x480420ff));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x420fc));
 	/* Maximum positive relative branch, + 20MB - 4B */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x49fffffc);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x1FFFFFC));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x49fffffc));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x1FFFFFC));
 	/* Smallest negative relative branch, - 4B */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x4bfffffc);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 4));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x4bfffffc));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 4));
 	/* Largest negative relative branch, - 32 MB */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x4a000000);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x2000000));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x4a000000));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x2000000));
 
 	/* Branch to self, with link */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
 
 	/* Branch to self - 0x100, with link */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr - 0x100, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x100));
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x100, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x100));
 
 	/* Branch to self + 0x100, no link */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr + 0x100, 0);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x100));
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 0x100, 0);
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x100));
 
 	/* Maximum relative negative offset, - 32 MB */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr - 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x2000000));
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x2000000));
 
 	/* Out of range relative negative offset, - 32 MB + 4*/
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr - 0x2000004, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x2000004, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 	check(err);
 
 	/* Out of range relative positive offset, + 32 MB */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr + 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 	check(err);
 
 	/* Unaligned target */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr + 3, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 3, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 	check(err);
 
 	/* Check flags are masked correctly */
-	err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
+	err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC);
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
 	check(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0x48000000)));
 }
 
@@ -513,9 +518,10 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
 	int err;
 	unsigned long addr;
 	struct ppc_inst *iptr, instr;
+	unsigned int tmp[2];
 	unsigned int flags;
 
-	iptr = &instr;
+	iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)tmp;
 	addr = (unsigned long)iptr;
 
 	/* The simplest case, branch to self, no flags */
@@ -528,39 +534,43 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
 	check(!instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst(0x7bffffff)));
 
 	/* Absolute conditional branch to 0x100 */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff0103);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x100));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff0103));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x100));
 	/* Absolute conditional branch to 0x20fc */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff20ff);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x20fc));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff20ff));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x20fc));
 	/* Maximum positive relative conditional branch, + 32 KB - 4B */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff7ffc);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x7FFC));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff7ffc));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x7FFC));
 	/* Smallest negative relative conditional branch, - 4B */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x43fffffc);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 4));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43fffffc));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 4));
 	/* Largest negative relative conditional branch, - 32 KB */
-	instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff8000);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x8000));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff8000));
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x8000));
 
 	/* All condition code bits set & link */
 	flags = 0x3ff000 | BRANCH_SET_LINK;
 
 	/* Branch to self */
 	err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, flags);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
 
 	/* Branch to self - 0x100 */
 	err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x100, flags);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x100));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x100));
 
 	/* Branch to self + 0x100 */
 	err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 0x100, flags);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x100));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x100));
 
 	/* Maximum relative negative offset, - 32 KB */
 	err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x8000, flags);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x8000));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x8000));
 
 	/* Out of range relative negative offset, - 32 KB + 4*/
 	err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x8004, flags);
@@ -576,7 +586,8 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
 
 	/* Check flags are masked correctly */
 	err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC);
-	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
+	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
+	check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
 	check(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0x43FF0000)));
 }
 
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  2:01   ` Michael Ellerman
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions Christophe Leroy
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

'struct ppc_inst' is an internal representation of an instruction, but
in-memory instructions are and will remain a table of 'unsigned int'
forever.

Replace all 'struct ppc_inst *' used for locating an instruction in
memory by 'unsigned int *'. This removes a lot of undue casts
to 'struct ppc_inst *'.

It also helps locating ab-use of 'struct ppc_inst' dereference.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
v2: Fix a create_branch() in ftrace and take copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault() into account.
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h  | 22 +++---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h           | 14 ++--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h        |  4 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c          |  4 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c      |  4 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c          |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c                |  6 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c             | 17 ++--
 arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c           |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c           | 45 +++++------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c            |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c        | 33 ++++----
 arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c             |  6 +-
 arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c          | 50 ++++++------
 arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c         | 96 +++++++++++------------
 arch/powerpc/mm/maccess.c                 |  4 +-
 arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c           |  4 +-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c     |  4 +-
 arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c                  | 10 +--
 20 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
index f9bd1397b696..b20ee4e1e6fb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
@@ -23,13 +23,13 @@
 #define BRANCH_ABSOLUTE	0x2
 
 bool is_offset_in_branch_range(long offset);
-int create_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *addr,
+int create_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const unsigned int *addr,
 		  unsigned long target, int flags);
-int create_cond_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *addr,
+int create_cond_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const unsigned int *addr,
 		       unsigned long target, int flags);
-int patch_branch(struct ppc_inst *addr, unsigned long target, int flags);
-int patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr);
-int raw_patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr);
+int patch_branch(unsigned int *addr, unsigned long target, int flags);
+int patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, struct ppc_inst instr);
+int raw_patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, struct ppc_inst instr);
 
 static inline unsigned long patch_site_addr(s32 *site)
 {
@@ -38,18 +38,18 @@ static inline unsigned long patch_site_addr(s32 *site)
 
 static inline int patch_instruction_site(s32 *site, struct ppc_inst instr)
 {
-	return patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)patch_site_addr(site), instr);
+	return patch_instruction((unsigned int *)patch_site_addr(site), instr);
 }
 
 static inline int patch_branch_site(s32 *site, unsigned long target, int flags)
 {
-	return patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)patch_site_addr(site), target, flags);
+	return patch_branch((unsigned int *)patch_site_addr(site), target, flags);
 }
 
 static inline int modify_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned int clr,
 				     unsigned int set)
 {
-	return patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr, ppc_inst((*addr & ~clr) | set));
+	return patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst((*addr & ~clr) | set));
 }
 
 static inline int modify_instruction_site(s32 *site, unsigned int clr, unsigned int set)
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ static inline int modify_instruction_site(s32 *site, unsigned int clr, unsigned
 
 int instr_is_relative_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
 int instr_is_relative_link_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
-unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr);
-int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *dest,
-		     const struct ppc_inst *src);
+unsigned long branch_target(const unsigned int *instr);
+int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const unsigned int *dest,
+		     const unsigned int *src);
 extern bool is_conditional_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64
 void __patch_exception(int exc, unsigned long addr);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
index 5a0740ebf132..32d318c3b180 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
 	return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)), swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
 }
 
-static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
+static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const unsigned int *ptr)
 {
 	u32 val, suffix;
 
-	val = *(u32 *)ptr;
+	val = *ptr;
 	if ((val >> 26) == OP_PREFIX) {
-		suffix = *((u32 *)ptr + 1);
+		suffix = *(ptr + 1);
 		return ppc_inst_prefix(val, suffix);
 	} else {
 		return ppc_inst(val);
@@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
 	return ppc_inst(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)));
 }
 
-static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
+static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const unsigned int *ptr)
 {
-	return *ptr;
+	return ppc_inst(*ptr);
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
  * Return the address of the next instruction, if the instruction @value was
  * located at @location.
  */
-static inline struct ppc_inst *ppc_inst_next(void *location, struct ppc_inst *value)
+static inline unsigned int *ppc_inst_next(unsigned int *location, unsigned int *value)
 {
 	struct ppc_inst tmp;
 
@@ -177,6 +177,6 @@ static inline char *__ppc_inst_as_str(char str[PPC_INST_STR_LEN], struct ppc_ins
 	__str;				\
 })
 
-int copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(struct ppc_inst *inst, struct ppc_inst *src);
+int copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(struct ppc_inst *inst, unsigned int *src);
 
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_INST_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
index 5bf65f5d44a9..fe683371336f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uprobes.h
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ typedef ppc_opcode_t uprobe_opcode_t;
 
 struct arch_uprobe {
 	union {
-		struct ppc_inst	insn;
-		struct ppc_inst	ixol;
+		u32 insn[2];
+		u32 ixol[2];
 	};
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c
index 735e89337398..1476ae72a432 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash_dump.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void __init reserve_kdump_trampoline(void)
 
 static void __init create_trampoline(unsigned long addr)
 {
-	struct ppc_inst *p = (struct ppc_inst *)addr;
+	unsigned int *p = (unsigned int *)addr;
 
 	/* The maximum range of a single instruction branch, is the current
 	 * instruction's address + (32 MB - 4) bytes. For the trampoline we
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void __init create_trampoline(unsigned long addr)
 	 * two instructions it doesn't require any registers.
 	 */
 	patch_instruction(p, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP));
-	patch_branch((void *)p + 4, addr + PHYSICAL_START, 0);
+	patch_branch(p + 1, addr + PHYSICAL_START, 0);
 }
 
 void __init setup_kdump_trampoline(void)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
index 2ed14d4a47f5..93b0f3ec8fb0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_paravirt.c
@@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_epapr(unsigned long node,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < (len / 4); i++) {
 		struct ppc_inst inst = ppc_inst(be32_to_cpu(insts[i]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(epapr_hypercall_start + i), inst);
+		patch_instruction(epapr_hypercall_start + i, inst);
 #if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(epapr_ev_idle_start + i), inst);
+		patch_instruction(epapr_ev_idle_start + i, inst);
 #endif
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c
index ce87dc5ea23c..b58d5a0d8c28 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
 			       enum jump_label_type type)
 {
-	struct ppc_inst *addr = (struct ppc_inst *)jump_entry_code(entry);
+	unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)jump_entry_code(entry);
 
 	if (type == JUMP_LABEL_JMP)
 		patch_branch(addr, jump_entry_target(entry), 0);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
index 7dd2ad3603ad..22c82ccddaf9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -419,9 +419,9 @@ int kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint(struct kgdb_bkpt *bpt)
 {
 	int err;
 	unsigned int instr;
-	struct ppc_inst *addr = (struct ppc_inst *)bpt->bpt_addr;
+	unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)bpt->bpt_addr;
 
-	err = get_kernel_nofault(instr, (unsigned *) addr);
+	err = get_kernel_nofault(instr, addr);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ int kgdb_arch_remove_breakpoint(struct kgdb_bkpt *bpt)
 {
 	int err;
 	unsigned int instr = *(unsigned int *)bpt->saved_instr;
-	struct ppc_inst *addr = (struct ppc_inst *)bpt->bpt_addr;
+	unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)bpt->bpt_addr;
 
 	err = patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(instr));
 	if (err)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 01ab2163659e..e6dc2c5bb2cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct kprobe *prev;
-	struct ppc_inst insn = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->addr);
-	struct ppc_inst prefix = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)(p->addr - 1));
+	struct ppc_inst insn = ppc_inst_read(p->addr);
+	struct ppc_inst prefix = ppc_inst_read(p->addr - 1);
 
 	if ((unsigned long)p->addr & 0x03) {
 		printk("Attempt to register kprobe at an unaligned address\n");
@@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	preempt_disable();
 	prev = get_kprobe(p->addr - 1);
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
-	if (prev &&
-	    ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)prev->ainsn.insn))) {
+	if (prev && ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read(prev->ainsn.insn))) {
 		printk("Cannot register a kprobe on the second word of prefixed instruction\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -138,7 +137,7 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	}
 
 	if (!ret) {
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)p->ainsn.insn, insn);
+		patch_instruction(p->ainsn.insn, insn);
 		p->opcode = ppc_inst_val(insn);
 	}
 
@@ -149,13 +148,13 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_prepare_kprobe);
 
 void arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)p->addr, ppc_inst(BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION));
+	patch_instruction(p->addr, ppc_inst(BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION));
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_arm_kprobe);
 
 void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)p->addr, ppc_inst(p->opcode));
+	patch_instruction(p->addr, ppc_inst(p->opcode));
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_disarm_kprobe);
 
@@ -228,7 +227,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_prepare_kretprobe);
 static int try_to_emulate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	int ret;
-	struct ppc_inst insn = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->ainsn.insn);
+	struct ppc_inst insn = ppc_inst_read(p->ainsn.insn);
 
 	/* regs->nip is also adjusted if emulate_step returns 1 */
 	ret = emulate_step(regs, insn);
@@ -439,7 +438,7 @@ int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!cur || user_mode(regs))
 		return 0;
 
-	len = ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)cur->ainsn.insn));
+	len = ppc_inst_len(ppc_inst_read(cur->ainsn.insn));
 	/* make sure we got here for instruction we have a kprobe on */
 	if (((unsigned long)cur->ainsn.insn + len) != regs->nip)
 		return 0;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c
index 667104d4c455..f3b5097768b6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/mce_power.c
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int mce_find_instr_ea_and_phys(struct pt_regs *regs, uint64_t *addr,
 	pfn = addr_to_pfn(regs, regs->nip);
 	if (pfn != ULONG_MAX) {
 		instr_addr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + (regs->nip & ~PAGE_MASK);
-		instr = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)instr_addr);
+		instr = ppc_inst_read((unsigned int *)instr_addr);
 		if (!analyse_instr(&op, &tmp, instr)) {
 			pfn = addr_to_pfn(regs, op.ea);
 			*addr = op.ea;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
index cdf87086fa33..adaf31157f6d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
@@ -100,9 +100,8 @@ static unsigned long can_optimize(struct kprobe *p)
 	 * Ensure that the instruction is not a conditional branch,
 	 * and that can be emulated.
 	 */
-	if (!is_conditional_branch(ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->ainsn.insn)) &&
-	    analyse_instr(&op, &regs,
-			  ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->ainsn.insn)) == 1) {
+	if (!is_conditional_branch(ppc_inst_read(p->ainsn.insn)) &&
+	    analyse_instr(&op, &regs, ppc_inst_read(p->ainsn.insn)) == 1) {
 		emulate_update_regs(&regs, &op);
 		nip = regs.nip;
 	}
@@ -143,12 +142,10 @@ void arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
 
 static void patch_imm32_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
 {
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_LIS(reg, IMM_H(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_LIS(reg, IMM_H(val))));
 	addr++;
 
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORI(reg, reg, IMM_L(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORI(reg, reg, IMM_L(val))));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -158,31 +155,31 @@ static void patch_imm32_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *
 static void patch_imm64_load_insns(unsigned long long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
 {
 	/* lis reg,(op)@highest */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
+	patch_instruction(addr,
 			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ADDIS | ___PPC_RT(reg) |
 				   ((val >> 48) & 0xffff)));
 	addr++;
 
 	/* ori reg,reg,(op)@higher */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
+	patch_instruction(addr,
 			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
 				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | ((val >> 32) & 0xffff)));
 	addr++;
 
 	/* rldicr reg,reg,32,31 */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
+	patch_instruction(addr,
 			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_RLDICR | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
 				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | __PPC_SH64(32) | __PPC_ME64(31)));
 	addr++;
 
 	/* oris reg,reg,(op)@h */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
+	patch_instruction(addr,
 			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORIS | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
 				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | ((val >> 16) & 0xffff)));
 	addr++;
 
 	/* ori reg,reg,(op)@l */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)addr,
+	patch_instruction(addr,
 			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
 				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | (val & 0xffff)));
 }
@@ -238,8 +235,7 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
 	size = (TMPL_END_IDX * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)) / sizeof(int);
 	pr_devel("Copying template to %p, size %lu\n", buff, size);
 	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
-		rc = patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(buff + i),
-				       ppc_inst(*(optprobe_template_entry + i)));
+		rc = patch_instruction(buff + i, ppc_inst(*(optprobe_template_entry + i)));
 		if (rc < 0)
 			goto error;
 	}
@@ -260,34 +256,30 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
 		goto error;
 	}
 
-	rc = create_branch(&branch_op_callback,
-			   (struct ppc_inst *)(buff + TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX),
+	rc = create_branch(&branch_op_callback, buff + TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX,
 			   (unsigned long)op_callback_addr,
 			   BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 
-	rc |= create_branch(&branch_emulate_step,
-			    (struct ppc_inst *)(buff + TMPL_EMULATE_IDX),
+	rc |= create_branch(&branch_emulate_step, buff + TMPL_EMULATE_IDX,
 			    (unsigned long)emulate_step_addr,
 			    BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 
 	if (rc)
 		goto error;
 
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(buff + TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX),
-			  branch_op_callback);
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(buff + TMPL_EMULATE_IDX),
-			  branch_emulate_step);
+	patch_instruction(buff + TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX, branch_op_callback);
+	patch_instruction(buff + TMPL_EMULATE_IDX, branch_emulate_step);
 
 	/*
 	 * 3. load instruction to be emulated into relevant register, and
 	 */
-	temp = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->ainsn.insn);
+	temp = ppc_inst_read(p->ainsn.insn);
 	patch_imm_load_insns(ppc_inst_as_ulong(temp), 4, buff + TMPL_INSN_IDX);
 
 	/*
 	 * 4. branch back from trampoline
 	 */
-	patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)(buff + TMPL_RET_IDX), (unsigned long)nip, 0);
+	patch_branch(buff + TMPL_RET_IDX, nip, 0);
 
 	flush_icache_range((unsigned long)buff,
 			   (unsigned long)(&buff[TMPL_END_IDX]));
@@ -330,10 +322,9 @@ void arch_optimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist)
 		 */
 		memcpy(op->optinsn.copied_insn, op->kp.addr,
 					       RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE);
-		create_branch(&instr,
-			      (struct ppc_inst *)op->kp.addr,
+		create_branch(&instr, op->kp.addr,
 			      (unsigned long)op->optinsn.insn, 0);
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)op->kp.addr, instr);
+		patch_instruction(op->kp.addr, instr);
 		list_del_init(&op->list);
 	}
 }
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
index d7c1f92152af..77590ecf83b1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(DMA_MODE_WRITE);
  */
 notrace void __init machine_init(u64 dt_ptr)
 {
-	struct ppc_inst *addr = (struct ppc_inst *)patch_site_addr(&patch__memset_nocache);
+	unsigned int *addr = (unsigned int *)patch_site_addr(&patch__memset_nocache);
 	struct ppc_inst insn;
 
 	/* Configure static keys first, now that we're relocated. */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index ffe9537195aa..fc7453a27175 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ ftrace_call_replace(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr, int link)
 	addr = ppc_function_entry((void *)addr);
 
 	/* if (link) set op to 'bl' else 'b' */
-	create_branch(&op, (struct ppc_inst *)ip, addr, link ? 1 : 0);
+	create_branch(&op, (unsigned int *)ip, addr, link ? 1 : 0);
 
 	return op;
 }
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, struct ppc_inst old, struct ppc_inst new)
 	}
 
 	/* replace the text with the new text */
-	if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)ip, new))
+	if (patch_instruction((unsigned int *)ip, new))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int test_24bit_addr(unsigned long ip, unsigned long addr)
 	addr = ppc_function_entry((void *)addr);
 
 	/* use the create_branch to verify that this offset can be branched */
-	return create_branch(&op, (struct ppc_inst *)ip, addr, 0) == 0;
+	return create_branch(&op, (unsigned int *)ip, addr, 0) == 0;
 }
 
 static int is_bl_op(struct ppc_inst op)
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL */
 
-	if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)ip, pop)) {
+	if (patch_instruction((unsigned int *)ip, pop)) {
 		pr_err("Patching NOP failed.\n");
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod,
 
 	op = ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP);
 
-	if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)ip, op))
+	if (patch_instruction((unsigned int *)ip, op))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int setup_mcount_compiler_tramp(unsigned long tramp)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)tramp, ptr, 0)) {
+	if (patch_branch((unsigned int *)tramp, ptr, 0)) {
 		pr_debug("REL24 out of range!\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int __ftrace_make_nop_kernel(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)ip, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP))) {
+	if (patch_instruction((unsigned int *)ip, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP))) {
 		pr_err("Patching NOP failed.\n");
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
@@ -589,10 +589,10 @@ __ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct ppc_inst op;
-	unsigned long ip = rec->ip;
+	unsigned int *ip = (unsigned int *)rec->ip;
 
 	/* read where this goes */
-	if (copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(&op, (void *)ip))
+	if (copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(&op, ip))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	/* It should be pointing to a nop */
@@ -608,8 +608,7 @@ __ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
 	}
 
 	/* create the branch to the trampoline */
-	err = create_branch(&op, (struct ppc_inst *)ip,
-			    rec->arch.mod->arch.tramp, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	err = create_branch(&op, ip, rec->arch.mod->arch.tramp, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 	if (err) {
 		pr_err("REL24 out of range!\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -617,7 +616,7 @@ __ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr)
 
 	pr_devel("write to %lx\n", rec->ip);
 
-	if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)ip, op))
+	if (patch_instruction(ip, op))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -762,7 +761,7 @@ __ftrace_modify_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long old_addr,
 	/* The new target may be within range */
 	if (test_24bit_addr(ip, addr)) {
 		/* within range */
-		if (patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)ip, addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK)) {
+		if (patch_branch((unsigned int *)ip, addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK)) {
 			pr_err("REL24 out of range!\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -790,12 +789,12 @@ __ftrace_modify_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long old_addr,
 	}
 
 	/* Ensure branch is within 24 bits */
-	if (create_branch(&op, (struct ppc_inst *)ip, tramp, BRANCH_SET_LINK)) {
+	if (create_branch(&op, (unsigned int *)ip, tramp, BRANCH_SET_LINK)) {
 		pr_err("Branch out of range\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)ip, tramp, BRANCH_SET_LINK)) {
+	if (patch_branch((unsigned int *)ip, tramp, BRANCH_SET_LINK)) {
 		pr_err("REL24 out of range!\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -851,7 +850,7 @@ int ftrace_update_ftrace_func(ftrace_func_t func)
 	struct ppc_inst old, new;
 	int ret;
 
-	old = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)&ftrace_call);
+	old = ppc_inst_read((unsigned int *)&ftrace_call);
 	new = ftrace_call_replace(ip, (unsigned long)func, 1);
 	ret = ftrace_modify_code(ip, old, new);
 
@@ -859,7 +858,7 @@ int ftrace_update_ftrace_func(ftrace_func_t func)
 	/* Also update the regs callback function */
 	if (!ret) {
 		ip = (unsigned long)(&ftrace_regs_call);
-		old = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)&ftrace_regs_call);
+		old = ppc_inst_read((unsigned int *)&ftrace_regs_call);
 		new = ftrace_call_replace(ip, (unsigned long)func, 1);
 		ret = ftrace_modify_code(ip, old, new);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
index 46971bb41d05..1aefd2ecbb8a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
-	    ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read(&auprobe->insn)) &&
+	    ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read(auprobe->insn)) &&
 	    (addr & 0x3f) == 60) {
 		pr_info_ratelimited("Cannot register a uprobe on 64 byte unaligned prefixed instruction\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * support doesn't exist and have to fix-up the next instruction
 	 * to be executed.
 	 */
-	regs->nip = (unsigned long)ppc_inst_next((void *)utask->vaddr, &auprobe->insn);
+	regs->nip = (unsigned long)ppc_inst_next((void *)utask->vaddr, auprobe->insn);
 
 	user_disable_single_step(current);
 	return 0;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ bool arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * emulate_step() returns 1 if the insn was successfully emulated.
 	 * For all other cases, we need to single-step in hardware.
 	 */
-	ret = emulate_step(regs, ppc_inst_read(&auprobe->insn));
+	ret = emulate_step(regs, ppc_inst_read(auprobe->insn));
 	if (ret > 0)
 		return true;
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
index 508e9511ca96..bab8bd2d2714 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/inst.h>
 
-static int __patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *exec_addr, struct ppc_inst instr,
-			       struct ppc_inst *patch_addr)
+static int __patch_instruction(unsigned int *exec_addr, struct ppc_inst instr,
+			       unsigned int *patch_addr)
 {
 	if (!ppc_inst_prefixed(instr)) {
 		u32 val = ppc_inst_val(instr);
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int __patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *exec_addr, struct ppc_inst instr
 	return -EFAULT;
 }
 
-int raw_patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
+int raw_patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 {
 	return __patch_instruction(addr, instr, addr);
 }
@@ -148,10 +148,10 @@ static inline int unmap_patch_area(unsigned long addr)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int do_patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
+static int do_patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 {
 	int err;
-	struct ppc_inst *patch_addr = NULL;
+	unsigned int *patch_addr = NULL;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long text_poke_addr;
 	unsigned long kaddr = (unsigned long)addr;
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	patch_addr = (struct ppc_inst *)(text_poke_addr + (kaddr & ~PAGE_MASK));
+	patch_addr = (unsigned int *)(text_poke_addr + (kaddr & ~PAGE_MASK));
 
 	__patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr);
 
@@ -187,14 +187,14 @@ static int do_patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 }
 #else /* !CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX */
 
-static int do_patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
+static int do_patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 {
 	return raw_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX */
 
-int patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
+int patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 {
 	/* Make sure we aren't patching a freed init section */
 	if (init_mem_is_free && init_section_contains(addr, 4)) {
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ int patch_instruction(struct ppc_inst *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instruction);
 
-int patch_branch(struct ppc_inst *addr, unsigned long target, int flags)
+int patch_branch(unsigned int *addr, unsigned long target, int flags)
 {
 	struct ppc_inst instr;
 
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ bool is_conditional_branch(struct ppc_inst instr)
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(is_conditional_branch);
 
 int create_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr,
-		  const struct ppc_inst *addr,
+		  const unsigned int *addr,
 		  unsigned long target, int flags)
 {
 	long offset;
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int create_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int create_cond_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *addr,
+int create_cond_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const unsigned int *addr,
 		       unsigned long target, int flags)
 {
 	long offset;
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ int instr_is_relative_link_branch(struct ppc_inst instr)
 	return instr_is_relative_branch(instr) && (ppc_inst_val(instr) & BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 }
 
-static unsigned long branch_iform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
+static unsigned long branch_iform_target(const unsigned int *instr)
 {
 	signed long imm;
 
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static unsigned long branch_iform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
 	return (unsigned long)imm;
 }
 
-static unsigned long branch_bform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
+static unsigned long branch_bform_target(const unsigned int *instr)
 {
 	signed long imm;
 
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static unsigned long branch_bform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
 	return (unsigned long)imm;
 }
 
-unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
+unsigned long branch_target(const unsigned int *instr)
 {
 	if (instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst_read(instr)))
 		return branch_iform_target(instr);
@@ -367,8 +367,8 @@ unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *dest,
-		     const struct ppc_inst *src)
+int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const unsigned int *dest,
+		     const unsigned int *src)
 {
 	unsigned long target;
 	target = branch_target(src);
@@ -395,13 +395,13 @@ void __patch_exception(int exc, unsigned long addr)
 	 * instruction of the exception, not the first one
 	 */
 
-	patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)(ibase + (exc / 4) + 1), addr, 0);
+	patch_branch(ibase + (exc / 4) + 1, addr, 0);
 }
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CODE_PATCHING_SELFTEST
 
-static int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr)
+static int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const unsigned int *instr, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	if (instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst_read(instr)) ||
 	    instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst_read(instr)))
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void)
 	int err;
 	struct ppc_inst instr;
 	unsigned int tmp[2];
-	struct ppc_inst *iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)tmp;
+	unsigned int *iptr = tmp;
 	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)tmp;
 
 	/* The simplest case, branch to self, no flags */
@@ -501,12 +501,12 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void)
 
 static void __init test_create_function_call(void)
 {
-	struct ppc_inst *iptr;
+	unsigned int *iptr;
 	unsigned long dest;
 	struct ppc_inst instr;
 
 	/* Check we can create a function call */
-	iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)ppc_function_entry(test_trampoline);
+	iptr = (unsigned int *)ppc_function_entry(test_trampoline);
 	dest = ppc_function_entry(test_create_function_call);
 	create_branch(&instr, iptr, dest, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 	patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
@@ -517,11 +517,11 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
 {
 	int err;
 	unsigned long addr;
-	struct ppc_inst *iptr, instr;
+	struct ppc_inst instr;
 	unsigned int tmp[2];
+	unsigned int *iptr = tmp;
 	unsigned int flags;
 
-	iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)tmp;
 	addr = (unsigned long)iptr;
 
 	/* The simplest case, branch to self, no flags */
@@ -726,9 +726,9 @@ static void __init test_prefixed_patching(void)
 	extern unsigned int code_patching_test1_expected[];
 	extern unsigned int end_code_patching_test1[];
 
-	__patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)code_patching_test1,
+	__patch_instruction(code_patching_test1,
 			    ppc_inst_prefix(OP_PREFIX << 26, 0x00000000),
-			    (struct ppc_inst *)code_patching_test1);
+			    code_patching_test1);
 
 	check(!memcmp(code_patching_test1,
 		      code_patching_test1_expected,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
index 8905b53109bc..801f34530133 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
@@ -33,18 +33,18 @@ struct fixup_entry {
 	long		alt_end_off;
 };
 
-static struct ppc_inst *calc_addr(struct fixup_entry *fcur, long offset)
+static unsigned int *calc_addr(struct fixup_entry *fcur, long offset)
 {
 	/*
 	 * We store the offset to the code as a negative offset from
 	 * the start of the alt_entry, to support the VDSO. This
 	 * routine converts that back into an actual address.
 	 */
-	return (struct ppc_inst *)((unsigned long)fcur + offset);
+	return (unsigned int *)((unsigned long)fcur + offset);
 }
 
-static int patch_alt_instruction(struct ppc_inst *src, struct ppc_inst *dest,
-				 struct ppc_inst *alt_start, struct ppc_inst *alt_end)
+static int patch_alt_instruction(unsigned int *src, unsigned int *dest,
+				 unsigned int *alt_start, unsigned int *alt_end)
 {
 	int err;
 	struct ppc_inst instr;
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int patch_alt_instruction(struct ppc_inst *src, struct ppc_inst *dest,
 	instr = ppc_inst_read(src);
 
 	if (instr_is_relative_branch(ppc_inst_read(src))) {
-		struct ppc_inst *target = (struct ppc_inst *)branch_target(src);
+		unsigned int *target = (unsigned int *)branch_target(src);
 
 		/* Branch within the section doesn't need translating */
 		if (target < alt_start || target > alt_end) {
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int patch_alt_instruction(struct ppc_inst *src, struct ppc_inst *dest,
 
 static int patch_feature_section(unsigned long value, struct fixup_entry *fcur)
 {
-	struct ppc_inst *start, *end, *alt_start, *alt_end, *src, *dest, nop;
+	unsigned int *start, *end, *alt_start, *alt_end, *src, *dest;
 
 	start = calc_addr(fcur, fcur->start_off);
 	end = calc_addr(fcur, fcur->end_off);
@@ -91,9 +91,8 @@ static int patch_feature_section(unsigned long value, struct fixup_entry *fcur)
 			return 1;
 	}
 
-	nop = ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP);
-	for (; dest < end; dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, &nop))
-		raw_patch_instruction(dest, nop);
+	for (; dest < end; dest++)
+		raw_patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP));
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -152,14 +151,14 @@ static void do_stf_entry_barrier_fixups(enum stf_barrier_type types)
 
 		// See comment in do_entry_flush_fixups() RE order of patching
 		if (types & STF_BARRIER_FALLBACK) {
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-			patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1),
+			patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+			patch_branch(dest + 1,
 				     (unsigned long)&stf_barrier_fallback, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 		} else {
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+			patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -213,12 +212,12 @@ static void do_stf_exit_barrier_fixups(enum stf_barrier_type types)
 
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
 
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 3), ppc_inst(instrs[3]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 4), ppc_inst(instrs[4]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 5), ppc_inst(instrs[5]));
+		patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 3, ppc_inst(instrs[3]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 4, ppc_inst(instrs[4]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 5, ppc_inst(instrs[5]));
 	}
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "stf-barrier: patched %d exit locations (%s barrier)\n", i,
 		(types == STF_BARRIER_NONE)                  ? "no" :
@@ -282,11 +281,11 @@ void do_uaccess_flush_fixups(enum l1d_flush_type types)
 
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
 
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+		patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
 
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 3), ppc_inst(instrs[3]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 3, ppc_inst(instrs[3]));
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "uaccess-flush: patched %d locations (%s flush)\n", i,
@@ -358,14 +357,14 @@ static int __do_entry_flush_fixups(void *data)
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
 
 		if (types == L1D_FLUSH_FALLBACK) {
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-			patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1),
+			patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+			patch_branch(dest + 1,
 				     (unsigned long)&entry_flush_fallback, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 		} else {
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+			patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -377,14 +376,14 @@ static int __do_entry_flush_fixups(void *data)
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
 
 		if (types == L1D_FLUSH_FALLBACK) {
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-			patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1),
+			patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+			patch_branch(dest + 1,
 				     (unsigned long)&scv_entry_flush_fallback, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 		} else {
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
-			patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
+			patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+			patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -443,9 +442,9 @@ void do_rfi_flush_fixups(enum l1d_flush_type types)
 
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
 
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 2), ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
+		patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instrs[0]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instrs[1]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 2, ppc_inst(instrs[2]));
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "rfi-flush: patched %d locations (%s flush)\n", i,
@@ -478,7 +477,7 @@ void do_barrier_nospec_fixups_range(bool enable, void *fixup_start, void *fixup_
 		dest = (void *)start + *start;
 
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instr));
+		patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instr));
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "barrier-nospec: patched %d locations\n", i);
@@ -521,8 +520,8 @@ void do_barrier_nospec_fixups_range(bool enable, void *fixup_start, void *fixup_
 		dest = (void *)start + *start;
 
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)dest);
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)dest, ppc_inst(instr[0]));
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)(dest + 1), ppc_inst(instr[1]));
+		patch_instruction(dest, ppc_inst(instr[0]));
+		patch_instruction(dest + 1, ppc_inst(instr[1]));
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "barrier-nospec: patched %d locations\n", i);
@@ -536,7 +535,7 @@ static void patch_btb_flush_section(long *curr)
 	end = (void *)curr + *(curr + 1);
 	for (; start < end; start++) {
 		pr_devel("patching dest %lx\n", (unsigned long)start);
-		patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)start, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP));
+		patch_instruction(start, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -555,7 +554,7 @@ void do_btb_flush_fixups(void)
 void do_lwsync_fixups(unsigned long value, void *fixup_start, void *fixup_end)
 {
 	long *start, *end;
-	struct ppc_inst *dest;
+	unsigned int *dest;
 
 	if (!(value & CPU_FTR_LWSYNC))
 		return ;
@@ -572,13 +571,14 @@ void do_lwsync_fixups(unsigned long value, void *fixup_start, void *fixup_end)
 static void do_final_fixups(void)
 {
 #if defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && defined(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE)
-	struct ppc_inst inst, *src, *dest, *end;
+	struct ppc_inst inst;
+	unsigned int *src, *dest, *end;
 
 	if (PHYSICAL_START == 0)
 		return;
 
-	src = (struct ppc_inst *)(KERNELBASE + PHYSICAL_START);
-	dest = (struct ppc_inst *)KERNELBASE;
+	src = (unsigned int *)(KERNELBASE + PHYSICAL_START);
+	dest = (unsigned int *)KERNELBASE;
 	end = (void *)src + (__end_interrupts - _stext);
 
 	while (src < end) {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/maccess.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/maccess.c
index a3c30a884076..de4279f770ed 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/maccess.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/maccess.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ bool copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed(const void *unsafe_src, size_t size)
 	return is_kernel_addr((unsigned long)unsafe_src);
 }
 
-int copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(struct ppc_inst *inst, struct ppc_inst *src)
+int copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(struct ppc_inst *inst, unsigned int *src)
 {
 	unsigned int val, suffix;
 	int err;
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ int copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault(struct ppc_inst *inst, struct ppc_inst *src)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && get_op(val) == OP_PREFIX) {
-		err = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&suffix, (void *)src + 4, 4);
+		err = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&suffix, src + 1, sizeof(suffix));
 		*inst = ppc_inst_prefix(val, suffix);
 	} else {
 		*inst = ppc_inst(val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 16d4d1b6a1ff..3e864feaacf7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static __u64 power_pmu_bhrb_to(u64 addr)
 				sizeof(instr)))
 			return 0;
 
-		return branch_target((struct ppc_inst *)&instr);
+		return branch_target(&instr);
 	}
 
 	/* Userspace: need copy instruction here then translate it */
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static __u64 power_pmu_bhrb_to(u64 addr)
 			sizeof(instr)))
 		return 0;
 
-	target = branch_target((struct ppc_inst *)&instr);
+	target = branch_target(&instr);
 	if ((!target) || (instr & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE))
 		return target;
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
index 87f524e4b09c..302f2a1e0361 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ smp_86xx_kick_cpu(int nr)
 		mdelay(1);
 
 	/* Restore the exception vector */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
+	patch_instruction(vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
index adae2a6712e1..bdfea6d6ab69 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/smp.c
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static int smp_core99_kick_cpu(int nr)
 	 *   b __secondary_start_pmac_0 + nr*8
 	 */
 	target = (unsigned long) __secondary_start_pmac_0 + nr * 8;
-	patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)vector, target, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	patch_branch(vector, target, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 
 	/* Put some life in our friend */
 	pmac_call_feature(PMAC_FTR_RESET_CPU, NULL, nr, 0);
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int smp_core99_kick_cpu(int nr)
 	mdelay(1);
 
 	/* Restore our exception vector */
-	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
+	patch_instruction(vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	if (ppc_md.progress) ppc_md.progress("smp_core99_kick_cpu done", 0x347);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index c8173e92f19d..3b8770455551 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static long *xmon_fault_jmp[NR_CPUS];
 /* Breakpoint stuff */
 struct bpt {
 	unsigned long	address;
-	struct ppc_inst	*instr;
+	unsigned int	*instr;
 	atomic_t	ref_count;
 	int		enabled;
 	unsigned long	pad;
@@ -946,11 +946,11 @@ static void insert_bpts(void)
 		}
 
 		patch_instruction(bp->instr, instr);
-		patch_instruction(ppc_inst_next(bp->instr, &instr),
+		patch_instruction(ppc_inst_next(bp->instr, bp->instr),
 				  ppc_inst(bpinstr));
 		if (bp->enabled & BP_CIABR)
 			continue;
-		if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)bp->address,
+		if (patch_instruction((unsigned int *)bp->address,
 				      ppc_inst(bpinstr)) != 0) {
 			printf("Couldn't write instruction at %lx, "
 			       "disabling breakpoint there\n", bp->address);
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static void remove_bpts(void)
 		if (mread_instr(bp->address, &instr)
 		    && ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(bpinstr))
 		    && patch_instruction(
-			(struct ppc_inst *)bp->address, ppc_inst_read(bp->instr)) != 0)
+			(unsigned int *)bp->address, ppc_inst_read(bp->instr)) != 0)
 			printf("Couldn't remove breakpoint at %lx\n",
 			       bp->address);
 	}
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ mread_instr(unsigned long adrs, struct ppc_inst *instr)
 	if (setjmp(bus_error_jmp) == 0) {
 		catch_memory_errors = 1;
 		sync();
-		*instr = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)adrs);
+		*instr = ppc_inst_read((unsigned int *)adrs);
 		sync();
 		/* wait a little while to see if we get a machine check */
 		__delay(200);
-- 
2.25.0




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  3:48   ` Jordan Niethe
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] powerpc/optprobes: Minimise casts Christophe Leroy
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

ppc_inst() ppc_inst_prefixed() ppc_inst_swab() can easily
be made common to both PPC32 and PPC64.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 49 +++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
index 32d318c3b180..e009e94e90b2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_primary_opcode(struct ppc_inst x)
 	return ppc_inst_val(x) >> 26;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 #define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x) })
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 #define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = (y) })
 
 static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
@@ -70,57 +70,34 @@ static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
 	return x.suffix;
 }
 
-static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
-{
-	return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX;
-}
+#else
+#define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ppc_inst(x)
 
-static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
+static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
-	return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)), swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
+	return 0;
 }
 
+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
+
 static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const unsigned int *ptr)
 {
-	u32 val, suffix;
-
-	val = *ptr;
-	if ((val >> 26) == OP_PREFIX) {
-		suffix = *(ptr + 1);
-		return ppc_inst_prefix(val, suffix);
-	} else {
-		return ppc_inst(val);
-	}
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && (*ptr >> 26) == OP_PREFIX)
+		return ppc_inst_prefix(*ptr, *(ptr + 1));
+	else
+		return ppc_inst(*ptr);
 }
 
-#else
-
-#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = x })
-
-#define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ppc_inst(x)
-
 static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
-	return false;
-}
-
-static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
-{
-	return 0;
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX;
 }
 
 static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
 {
-	return ppc_inst(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)));
-}
-
-static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const unsigned int *ptr)
-{
-	return ppc_inst(*ptr);
+	return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)), swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
 }
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
-
 static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
 {
 	if (ppc_inst_val(x) != ppc_inst_val(y))
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 10/12] powerpc/optprobes: Minimise casts
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/optprobes: Compact code source a bit Christophe Leroy
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

nip is already an unsigned long, no cast needed.

op_callback_addr and emulate_step_addr are kprobe_opcode_t *.
There value is obtained with ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name() which
returns 'unsigned long', and there values are used create_branch()
which expects 'unsigned long'. So change them to 'unsigned long'
to avoid casting them back and forth.

can_optimize() used p->addr several times as 'unsigned long'.
Use a local 'unsigned long' variable and avoid casting multiple times.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
index adaf31157f6d..8c08ca15faf3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned long can_optimize(struct kprobe *p)
 	struct pt_regs regs;
 	struct instruction_op op;
 	unsigned long nip = 0;
+	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p->addr;
 
 	/*
 	 * kprobe placed for kretprobe during boot time
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long can_optimize(struct kprobe *p)
 	 * So further checks can be skipped.
 	 */
 	if (p->addr == (kprobe_opcode_t *)&kretprobe_trampoline)
-		return (unsigned long)p->addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
+		return addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
 
 	/*
 	 * We only support optimizing kernel addresses, but not
@@ -81,11 +82,11 @@ static unsigned long can_optimize(struct kprobe *p)
 	 *
 	 * FIXME: Optimize kprobes placed in module addresses.
 	 */
-	if (!is_kernel_addr((unsigned long)p->addr))
+	if (!is_kernel_addr(addr))
 		return 0;
 
 	memset(&regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
-	regs.nip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
+	regs.nip = addr;
 	regs.trap = 0x0;
 	regs.msr = MSR_KERNEL;
 
@@ -195,7 +196,8 @@ static void patch_imm_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *ad
 int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	struct ppc_inst branch_op_callback, branch_emulate_step, temp;
-	kprobe_opcode_t *op_callback_addr, *emulate_step_addr, *buff;
+	unsigned long op_callback_addr, emulate_step_addr;
+	kprobe_opcode_t *buff;
 	long b_offset;
 	unsigned long nip, size;
 	int rc, i;
@@ -225,8 +227,7 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
 		goto error;
 
 	/* Check if the return address is also within 32MB range */
-	b_offset = (unsigned long)(buff + TMPL_RET_IDX) -
-			(unsigned long)nip;
+	b_offset = (unsigned long)(buff + TMPL_RET_IDX) - nip;
 	if (!is_offset_in_branch_range(b_offset))
 		goto error;
 
@@ -249,20 +250,18 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
 	/*
 	 * 2. branch to optimized_callback() and emulate_step()
 	 */
-	op_callback_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name("optimized_callback");
-	emulate_step_addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name("emulate_step");
+	op_callback_addr = ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name("optimized_callback");
+	emulate_step_addr = ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name("emulate_step");
 	if (!op_callback_addr || !emulate_step_addr) {
 		WARN(1, "Unable to lookup optimized_callback()/emulate_step()\n");
 		goto error;
 	}
 
 	rc = create_branch(&branch_op_callback, buff + TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX,
-			   (unsigned long)op_callback_addr,
-			   BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+			   op_callback_addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 
 	rc |= create_branch(&branch_emulate_step, buff + TMPL_EMULATE_IDX,
-			    (unsigned long)emulate_step_addr,
-			    BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+			    emulate_step_addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 
 	if (rc)
 		goto error;
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/optprobes: Compact code source a bit.
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] powerpc/optprobes: Minimise casts Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] powerpc/optprobes: use PPC_RAW_ macros Christophe Leroy
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Now that lines can be up to 100 chars long, minimise the
amount of split lines to increase readability.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
index 8c08ca15faf3..9c1c8de8c06d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
@@ -18,18 +18,12 @@
 #include <asm/ppc-opcode.h>
 #include <asm/inst.h>
 
-#define TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX	\
-	(optprobe_template_call_handler - optprobe_template_entry)
-#define TMPL_EMULATE_IDX	\
-	(optprobe_template_call_emulate - optprobe_template_entry)
-#define TMPL_RET_IDX		\
-	(optprobe_template_ret - optprobe_template_entry)
-#define TMPL_OP_IDX		\
-	(optprobe_template_op_address - optprobe_template_entry)
-#define TMPL_INSN_IDX		\
-	(optprobe_template_insn - optprobe_template_entry)
-#define TMPL_END_IDX		\
-	(optprobe_template_end - optprobe_template_entry)
+#define TMPL_CALL_HDLR_IDX	(optprobe_template_call_handler - optprobe_template_entry)
+#define TMPL_EMULATE_IDX	(optprobe_template_call_emulate - optprobe_template_entry)
+#define TMPL_RET_IDX		(optprobe_template_ret - optprobe_template_entry)
+#define TMPL_OP_IDX		(optprobe_template_op_address - optprobe_template_entry)
+#define TMPL_INSN_IDX		(optprobe_template_insn - optprobe_template_entry)
+#define TMPL_END_IDX		(optprobe_template_end - optprobe_template_entry)
 
 DEFINE_INSN_CACHE_OPS(ppc_optinsn);
 
@@ -280,8 +274,7 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
 	 */
 	patch_branch(buff + TMPL_RET_IDX, nip, 0);
 
-	flush_icache_range((unsigned long)buff,
-			   (unsigned long)(&buff[TMPL_END_IDX]));
+	flush_icache_range((unsigned long)buff, (unsigned long)(&buff[TMPL_END_IDX]));
 
 	op->optinsn.insn = buff;
 
@@ -319,10 +312,8 @@ void arch_optimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist)
 		 * Backup instructions which will be replaced
 		 * by jump address
 		 */
-		memcpy(op->optinsn.copied_insn, op->kp.addr,
-					       RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE);
-		create_branch(&instr, op->kp.addr,
-			      (unsigned long)op->optinsn.insn, 0);
+		memcpy(op->optinsn.copied_insn, op->kp.addr, RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE);
+		create_branch(&instr, op->kp.addr, (unsigned long)op->optinsn.insn, 0);
 		patch_instruction(op->kp.addr, instr);
 		list_del_init(&op->list);
 	}
@@ -333,8 +324,7 @@ void arch_unoptimize_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
 	arch_arm_kprobe(&op->kp);
 }
 
-void arch_unoptimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist,
-			     struct list_head *done_list)
+void arch_unoptimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist, struct list_head *done_list)
 {
 	struct optimized_kprobe *op;
 	struct optimized_kprobe *tmp;
@@ -345,8 +335,7 @@ void arch_unoptimize_kprobes(struct list_head *oplist,
 	}
 }
 
-int arch_within_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op,
-				 unsigned long addr)
+int arch_within_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	return ((unsigned long)op->kp.addr <= addr &&
 		(unsigned long)op->kp.addr + RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE > addr);
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 12/12] powerpc/optprobes: use PPC_RAW_ macros
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/optprobes: Compact code source a bit Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-05-20 13:50 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-05-20 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Use PPC_RAW_ macros to simplify the code.

And use PPC_LO/PPC_HI instead of IMM_L/IMM_H which are for
internal use inside ppc-opcode.h

Those macros are self explanatory, comments can go as well.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 11 ++++----
 arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c       | 39 +++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index ac41776661e9..87802e8073e6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -261,9 +261,6 @@
 #define PPC_INST_BCTR			0x4e800420
 #define PPC_INST_BCTRL			0x4e800421
 #define PPC_INST_DIVD			0x7c0003d2
-#define PPC_INST_RLDICR			0x78000004
-#define PPC_INST_ORI			0x60000000
-#define PPC_INST_ORIS			0x64000000
 #define PPC_INST_BRANCH			0x48000000
 #define PPC_INST_BL			0x48000001
 #define PPC_INST_BRANCH_COND		0x40800000
@@ -323,6 +320,8 @@
 #define PPC_LO(v)	((v) & 0xffff)
 #define PPC_HI(v)	(((v) >> 16) & 0xffff)
 #define PPC_HA(v)	PPC_HI((v) + 0x8000)
+#define PPC_HIGHER(v)	(((v) >> 32) & 0xffff)
+#define PPC_HIGHEST(v)	(((v) >> 48) & 0xffff)
 
 /*
  * Only use the larx hint bit on 64bit CPUs. e500v1/v2 based CPUs will treat a
@@ -499,8 +498,8 @@
 #define PPC_RAW_AND_DOT(d, a, b)	(0x7c000039 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
 #define PPC_RAW_OR(d, a, b)		(0x7c000378 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
 #define PPC_RAW_MR(d, a)		PPC_RAW_OR(d, a, a)
-#define PPC_RAW_ORI(d, a, i)		(PPC_INST_ORI | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | IMM_L(i))
-#define PPC_RAW_ORIS(d, a, i)		(PPC_INST_ORIS | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | IMM_L(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_ORI(d, a, i)		(0x60000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | IMM_L(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_ORIS(d, a, i)		(0x64000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | IMM_L(i))
 #define PPC_RAW_NOR(d, a, b)		(0x7c0000f8 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
 #define PPC_RAW_XOR(d, a, b)		(0x7c000278 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
 #define PPC_RAW_XORI(d, a, i)		(0x68000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | IMM_L(i))
@@ -519,7 +518,7 @@
 					(0x54000001 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH(i) | __PPC_MB(mb) | __PPC_ME(me))
 #define PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(d, a, i, mb, me) (0x50000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH(i) | __PPC_MB(mb) | __PPC_ME(me))
 #define PPC_RAW_RLDICL(d, a, i, mb)     (0x78000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH64(i) | __PPC_MB64(mb))
-#define PPC_RAW_RLDICR(d, a, i, me)     (PPC_INST_RLDICR | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH64(i) | __PPC_ME64(me))
+#define PPC_RAW_RLDICR(d, a, i, me)     (0x78000004 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH64(i) | __PPC_ME64(me))
 
 /* slwi = rlwinm Rx, Ry, n, 0, 31-n */
 #define PPC_RAW_SLWI(d, a, i)		PPC_RAW_RLWINM(d, a, i, 0, 31-(i))
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
index 9c1c8de8c06d..1488d4e9b34d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c
@@ -137,10 +137,8 @@ void arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
 
 static void patch_imm32_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
 {
-	patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_LIS(reg, IMM_H(val))));
-	addr++;
-
-	patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORI(reg, reg, IMM_L(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr++, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_LIS(reg, PPC_HI(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORI(reg, reg, PPC_LO(val))));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -149,34 +147,11 @@ static void patch_imm32_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *
  */
 static void patch_imm64_load_insns(unsigned long long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
 {
-	/* lis reg,(op)@highest */
-	patch_instruction(addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ADDIS | ___PPC_RT(reg) |
-				   ((val >> 48) & 0xffff)));
-	addr++;
-
-	/* ori reg,reg,(op)@higher */
-	patch_instruction(addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
-				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | ((val >> 32) & 0xffff)));
-	addr++;
-
-	/* rldicr reg,reg,32,31 */
-	patch_instruction(addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_RLDICR | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
-				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | __PPC_SH64(32) | __PPC_ME64(31)));
-	addr++;
-
-	/* oris reg,reg,(op)@h */
-	patch_instruction(addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORIS | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
-				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | ((val >> 16) & 0xffff)));
-	addr++;
-
-	/* ori reg,reg,(op)@l */
-	patch_instruction(addr,
-			  ppc_inst(PPC_INST_ORI | ___PPC_RA(reg) |
-				   ___PPC_RS(reg) | (val & 0xffff)));
+	patch_instruction(addr++, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_LIS(reg, PPC_HIGHEST(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr++, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORI(reg, reg, PPC_HIGHER(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr++, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_SLDI(reg, reg, 32)));
+	patch_instruction(addr++, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORIS(reg, reg, PPC_HI(val))));
+	patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_ORI(reg, reg, PPC_LO(val))));
 }
 
 static void patch_imm_load_insns(unsigned long val, int reg, kprobe_opcode_t *addr)
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] powerpc/optprobes: use PPC_RAW_ macros Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-08 12:46 ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-15  7:18 ` Michael Ellerman
  2021-06-18  3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-06-08 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, naveen.n.rao, jniethe5,
	Paul Mackerras, Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Hi Michael,

Le 20/05/2021 à 15:50, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
> 
> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
> and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.
> 
> This series cleans it up.
> 
> First patch is fixing detection of missing '__user' flag by sparse
> when using get_user_instr().
> 
> Last part of the series does some source code cleanup in
> optprobes, it is put at the ends of this series because of
> clashes with the 'struct ppc_inst' cleanups.

What are your plans about this series ? I fear that the more we wait the more we get additional bad 
uses of 'struct ppc_inst'.
There are several people working around places that play with instructions, so I think the sooner it 
gets cleaned the better it is. Do you agree ?

Thanks
Christophe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  2:01   ` Michael Ellerman
  2021-06-15  3:47     ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2021-06-15  2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> index 5a0740ebf132..32d318c3b180 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
>   * Return the address of the next instruction, if the instruction @value was
>   * located at @location.
>   */
> -static inline struct ppc_inst *ppc_inst_next(void *location, struct ppc_inst *value)
> +static inline unsigned int *ppc_inst_next(unsigned int *location, unsigned int *value)
>  {
>  	struct ppc_inst tmp;
>  

It's not visible in the diff, but the rest of the function is:

	tmp = ppc_inst_read(value);

	return location + ppc_inst_len(tmp);
}

And so changing the type of location from void * to int * changes the
result of that addition, ie. previously it was in units of bytes, now
it's units of 4 bytes.

To fix it I've kept location as unsigned int *, and added a cast where
we do the addition. That way users of the function just see unsigned int *,
the cast to void * is an implementation detail.

We only have a handful of uses of ppc_inst_len(), so maybe that should
change name and return a result in units of int *. But that can be a
separate change.

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
> index 87f524e4b09c..302f2a1e0361 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ smp_86xx_kick_cpu(int nr)
>  		mdelay(1);
>  
>  	/* Restore the exception vector */
> -	patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
> +	patch_instruction(vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
>  
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  

There was another usage in here:

 	/* Setup fake reset vector to call __secondary_start_mpc86xx. */
 	target = (unsigned long) __secondary_start_mpc86xx;
-	patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)vector, target, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
+	patch_branch(vector, target, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
 
 	/* Kick that CPU */
 	smp_86xx_release_core(nr);

I fixed it up.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal()
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal() Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  3:38   ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2021-06-15  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Naveen N. Rao, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:50 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
> Avoid casting/dereferencing ppc_inst() as u64* , check each member
> of the struct when relevant.
>
> And remove the 0xff initialisation of the suffix for non
> prefixed instruction. An instruction with 0xff as a suffix
> might be invalid, but still is a prefixed instruction and
> has to be considered as this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 19 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> index fc6adef528a5..5a0740ebf132 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_primary_opcode(struct ppc_inst x)
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> -#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = 0xff })
> +#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x) })
>
>  #define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = (y) })
>
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
>
>  static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
>  {
> -       return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX && ppc_inst_suffix(x) != 0xff;
> +       return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX;
>  }
>
>  static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
> @@ -93,11 +93,6 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
>         }
>  }
>
> -static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
> -{
> -       return *(u64 *)&x == *(u64 *)&y;
> -}
> -
>  #else
>
>  #define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = x })
> @@ -124,13 +119,17 @@ static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const struct ppc_inst *ptr)
>         return *ptr;
>  }
>
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
> +
>  static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
>  {
> -       return ppc_inst_val(x) == ppc_inst_val(y);
> +       if (ppc_inst_val(x) != ppc_inst_val(y))
> +               return false;
> +       if (!ppc_inst_prefixed(x))
> +               return true;
> +       return ppc_inst_suffix(x) == ppc_inst_suffix(y);
>  }
>
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
> -
>  static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
>  {
>         return ppc_inst_prefixed(x) ? 8 : 4;
> --
> 2.25.0
>
Reviewed by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups)
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups) Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  3:41   ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2021-06-15  3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Naveen N. Rao, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:50 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
> 'struct ppc_inst' is an internal structure to represent an instruction,
> it is not directly the representation of that instruction in text code.
> It is not meant to map and dereference code.
>
> Dereferencing code directly through 'struct ppc_inst' has two main issues:
> - On powerpc, structs are expected to be 8 bytes aligned while code is
> spread every 4 byte.
> - Should a non prefixed instruction lie at the end of the page and the
> following page not be mapped, it would generate a page fault.
>
> In-memory code must be accessed with ppc_inst_read().
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c     | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c  | 8 ++++----
>  arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 186f69b11e94..46971bb41d05 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe,
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> -           ppc_inst_prefixed(auprobe->insn) &&
> +           ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read(&auprobe->insn)) &&
>             (addr & 0x3f) == 60) {
>                 pr_info_ratelimited("Cannot register a uprobe on 64 byte unaligned prefixed instruction\n");
>                 return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> index 870b30d9be2f..0308429b0d1a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -329,13 +329,13 @@ static unsigned long branch_iform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
>  {
>         signed long imm;
>
> -       imm = ppc_inst_val(*instr) & 0x3FFFFFC;
> +       imm = ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & 0x3FFFFFC;
>
>         /* If the top bit of the immediate value is set this is negative */
>         if (imm & 0x2000000)
>                 imm -= 0x4000000;
>
> -       if ((ppc_inst_val(*instr) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
> +       if ((ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
>                 imm += (unsigned long)instr;
>
>         return (unsigned long)imm;
> @@ -345,13 +345,13 @@ static unsigned long branch_bform_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
>  {
>         signed long imm;
>
> -       imm = ppc_inst_val(*instr) & 0xFFFC;
> +       imm = ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & 0xFFFC;
>
>         /* If the top bit of the immediate value is set this is negative */
>         if (imm & 0x8000)
>                 imm -= 0x10000;
>
> -       if ((ppc_inst_val(*instr) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
> +       if ((ppc_inst_val(ppc_inst_read(instr)) & BRANCH_ABSOLUTE) == 0)
>                 imm += (unsigned long)instr;
>
>         return (unsigned long)imm;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
> index fe26f2fa0f3f..8905b53109bc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/feature-fixups.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int patch_alt_instruction(struct ppc_inst *src, struct ppc_inst *dest,
>
>         instr = ppc_inst_read(src);
>
> -       if (instr_is_relative_branch(*src)) {
> +       if (instr_is_relative_branch(ppc_inst_read(src))) {
The above variable instr could be used here, but that is not an issue
with this patch.
>                 struct ppc_inst *target = (struct ppc_inst *)branch_target(src);
>
>                 /* Branch within the section doesn't need translating */
> --
> 2.25.0
>
Reviewed by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  3:42   ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2021-06-15  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Naveen N. Rao, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:50 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
> instr_is_branch_to_addr() is only used in code-patching.c
>
> Make it static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h |  1 -
>  arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c         | 18 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> index f1d029bf906e..f9bd1397b696 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static inline int modify_instruction_site(s32 *site, unsigned int clr, unsigned
>
>  int instr_is_relative_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
>  int instr_is_relative_link_branch(struct ppc_inst instr);
> -int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr);
>  unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr);
>  int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *dest,
>                      const struct ppc_inst *src);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> index 0308429b0d1a..82f2c1edb498 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -367,15 +367,6 @@ unsigned long branch_target(const struct ppc_inst *instr)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr)
> -{
> -       if (instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst_read(instr)) ||
> -           instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst_read(instr)))
> -               return branch_target(instr) == addr;
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  int translate_branch(struct ppc_inst *instr, const struct ppc_inst *dest,
>                      const struct ppc_inst *src)
>  {
> @@ -410,6 +401,15 @@ void __patch_exception(int exc, unsigned long addr)
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CODE_PATCHING_SELFTEST
>
> +static int instr_is_branch_to_addr(const struct ppc_inst *instr, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +       if (instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst_read(instr)) ||
> +           instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst_read(instr)))
> +               return branch_target(instr) == addr;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void __init test_trampoline(void)
>  {
>         asm ("nop;\n");
> --
> 2.25.0
>
Reviewed by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests.
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  3:42   ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2021-06-15  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Naveen N. Rao, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:50 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
> 'struct ppc_inst' is meant to represent an instruction internally, it
> is not meant to dereference code in memory.
>
> For testing code patching, use patch_instruction() to properly
> write into memory the code to be tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> index 82f2c1edb498..508e9511ca96 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void)
>  {
>         int err;
>         struct ppc_inst instr;
> -       unsigned long addr;
> -
> -       addr = (unsigned long)&instr;
> +       unsigned int tmp[2];
> +       struct ppc_inst *iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)tmp;
> +       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)tmp;
>
>         /* The simplest case, branch to self, no flags */
>         check(instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst(0x48000000)));
> @@ -445,52 +445,57 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void)
>         check(!instr_is_branch_iform(ppc_inst(0x7bfffffd)));
>
>         /* Absolute branch to 0x100 */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x48000103);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x100));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x48000103));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x100));
>         /* Absolute branch to 0x420fc */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x480420ff);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x420fc));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x480420ff));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x420fc));
>         /* Maximum positive relative branch, + 20MB - 4B */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x49fffffc);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x1FFFFFC));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x49fffffc));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x1FFFFFC));
>         /* Smallest negative relative branch, - 4B */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x4bfffffc);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 4));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x4bfffffc));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 4));
>         /* Largest negative relative branch, - 32 MB */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x4a000000);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x2000000));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x4a000000));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x2000000));
>
>         /* Branch to self, with link */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
>
>         /* Branch to self - 0x100, with link */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr - 0x100, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x100));
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x100, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x100));
>
>         /* Branch to self + 0x100, no link */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr + 0x100, 0);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x100));
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 0x100, 0);
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x100));
>
>         /* Maximum relative negative offset, - 32 MB */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr - 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x2000000));
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x2000000));
>
>         /* Out of range relative negative offset, - 32 MB + 4*/
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr - 0x2000004, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x2000004, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
>         check(err);
>
>         /* Out of range relative positive offset, + 32 MB */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr + 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 0x2000000, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
>         check(err);
>
>         /* Unaligned target */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr + 3, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 3, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
>         check(err);
>
>         /* Check flags are masked correctly */
> -       err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
> +       err = create_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC);
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
>         check(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0x48000000)));
>  }
>
> @@ -513,9 +518,10 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
>         int err;
>         unsigned long addr;
>         struct ppc_inst *iptr, instr;
> +       unsigned int tmp[2];
>         unsigned int flags;
>
> -       iptr = &instr;
> +       iptr = (struct ppc_inst *)tmp;
>         addr = (unsigned long)iptr;
>
>         /* The simplest case, branch to self, no flags */
> @@ -528,39 +534,43 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
>         check(!instr_is_branch_bform(ppc_inst(0x7bffffff)));
>
>         /* Absolute conditional branch to 0x100 */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff0103);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x100));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff0103));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x100));
>         /* Absolute conditional branch to 0x20fc */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff20ff);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, 0x20fc));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff20ff));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, 0x20fc));
>         /* Maximum positive relative conditional branch, + 32 KB - 4B */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff7ffc);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x7FFC));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff7ffc));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x7FFC));
>         /* Smallest negative relative conditional branch, - 4B */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x43fffffc);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 4));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43fffffc));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 4));
>         /* Largest negative relative conditional branch, - 32 KB */
> -       instr = ppc_inst(0x43ff8000);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x8000));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, ppc_inst(0x43ff8000));
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x8000));
>
>         /* All condition code bits set & link */
>         flags = 0x3ff000 | BRANCH_SET_LINK;
>
>         /* Branch to self */
>         err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, flags);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
>
>         /* Branch to self - 0x100 */
>         err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x100, flags);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x100));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x100));
>
>         /* Branch to self + 0x100 */
>         err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr + 0x100, flags);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr + 0x100));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr + 0x100));
>
>         /* Maximum relative negative offset, - 32 KB */
>         err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x8000, flags);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr - 0x8000));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr - 0x8000));
>
>         /* Out of range relative negative offset, - 32 KB + 4*/
>         err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr - 0x8004, flags);
> @@ -576,7 +586,8 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void)
>
>         /* Check flags are masked correctly */
>         err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC);
> -       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr));
> +       patch_instruction(iptr, instr);
> +       check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(iptr, addr));
>         check(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0x43FF0000)));
>  }
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>
Reviewed by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
  2021-06-15  2:01   ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2021-06-15  3:47     ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2021-06-15  3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christophe Leroy, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	Naveen N. Rao, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> > index 5a0740ebf132..32d318c3b180 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_len(struct ppc_inst x)
> >   * Return the address of the next instruction, if the instruction @value was
> >   * located at @location.
> >   */
> > -static inline struct ppc_inst *ppc_inst_next(void *location, struct ppc_inst *value)
> > +static inline unsigned int *ppc_inst_next(unsigned int *location, unsigned int *value)
> >  {
> >       struct ppc_inst tmp;
> >
>
> It's not visible in the diff, but the rest of the function is:
>
>         tmp = ppc_inst_read(value);
>
>         return location + ppc_inst_len(tmp);
> }
>
> And so changing the type of location from void * to int * changes the
> result of that addition, ie. previously it was in units of bytes, now
> it's units of 4 bytes.
>
> To fix it I've kept location as unsigned int *, and added a cast where
> we do the addition. That way users of the function just see unsigned int *,
> the cast to void * is an implementation detail.
>
> We only have a handful of uses of ppc_inst_len(), so maybe that should
> change name and return a result in units of int *. But that can be a
> separate change.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
> > index 87f524e4b09c..302f2a1e0361 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_smp.c
> > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ smp_86xx_kick_cpu(int nr)
> >               mdelay(1);
> >
> >       /* Restore the exception vector */
> > -     patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
> > +     patch_instruction(vector, ppc_inst(save_vector));
> >
> >       local_irq_restore(flags);
> >
>
> There was another usage in here:
>
>         /* Setup fake reset vector to call __secondary_start_mpc86xx. */
>         target = (unsigned long) __secondary_start_mpc86xx;
> -       patch_branch((struct ppc_inst *)vector, target, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
> +       patch_branch(vector, target, BRANCH_SET_LINK);
>
>         /* Kick that CPU */
>         smp_86xx_release_core(nr);
>
> I fixed it up.
>
> cheers
fwiw
Reviewed by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions
  2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  3:48   ` Jordan Niethe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2021-06-15  3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman,
	Naveen N. Rao, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:50 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> wrote:
>
> ppc_inst() ppc_inst_prefixed() ppc_inst_swab() can easily
> be made common to both PPC32 and PPC64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 49 +++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> index 32d318c3b180..e009e94e90b2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ static inline int ppc_inst_primary_opcode(struct ppc_inst x)
>         return ppc_inst_val(x) >> 26;
>  }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>  #define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x) })
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>  #define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = (x), .suffix = (y) })
>
>  static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
> @@ -70,57 +70,34 @@ static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
>         return x.suffix;
>  }
>
> -static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
> -{
> -       return ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX;
> -}
> +#else
> +#define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ppc_inst(x)
>
> -static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
> +static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
>  {
> -       return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)), swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
> +
>  static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const unsigned int *ptr)
>  {
> -       u32 val, suffix;
> -
> -       val = *ptr;
> -       if ((val >> 26) == OP_PREFIX) {
> -               suffix = *(ptr + 1);
> -               return ppc_inst_prefix(val, suffix);
> -       } else {
> -               return ppc_inst(val);
> -       }
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && (*ptr >> 26) == OP_PREFIX)
> +               return ppc_inst_prefix(*ptr, *(ptr + 1));
> +       else
> +               return ppc_inst(*ptr);
>  }
>
> -#else
> -
> -#define ppc_inst(x) ((struct ppc_inst){ .val = x })
> -
> -#define ppc_inst_prefix(x, y) ppc_inst(x)
> -
>  static inline bool ppc_inst_prefixed(struct ppc_inst x)
>  {
> -       return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline u32 ppc_inst_suffix(struct ppc_inst x)
> -{
> -       return 0;
> +       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && ppc_inst_primary_opcode(x) == OP_PREFIX;
>  }
>
>  static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_swab(struct ppc_inst x)
>  {
> -       return ppc_inst(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)));
> -}
> -
> -static inline struct ppc_inst ppc_inst_read(const unsigned int *ptr)
> -{
> -       return ppc_inst(*ptr);
> +       return ppc_inst_prefix(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x)), swab32(ppc_inst_suffix(x)));
>  }
>
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
> -
>  static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(struct ppc_inst x, struct ppc_inst y)
>  {
>         if (ppc_inst_val(x) != ppc_inst_val(y))
> --
> 2.25.0
>
Reviewed by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-15  7:18 ` Michael Ellerman
  2021-06-15  7:24   ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-18  3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2021-06-15  7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
>
> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
> and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.

Why don't we use u32 *, to make it even more explicit what the expected
size is?

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'
  2021-06-15  7:18 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2021-06-15  7:24   ` Christophe Leroy
  2021-06-16 13:05     ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2021-06-15  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev



Le 15/06/2021 à 09:18, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
>>
>> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
>> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
>> and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.
> 
> Why don't we use u32 *, to make it even more explicit what the expected
> size is?
> 

I guess that's historical, we could use u32 *

We can convert it incrementaly maybe ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'
  2021-06-15  7:24   ` Christophe Leroy
@ 2021-06-16 13:05     ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2021-06-16 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras,
	naveen.n.rao, jniethe5
  Cc: linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 15/06/2021 à 09:18, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>>> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
>>>
>>> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
>>> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
>>> and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.
>> 
>> Why don't we use u32 *, to make it even more explicit what the expected
>> size is?
>> 
>
> I guess that's historical, we could use u32 *

Yeah I think it is historical, we just never thought about it much.

> We can convert it incrementaly maybe ?

I've still got this series in next-test, so I'll go through it and
change any uses of unsigned int * to u32 *, and then we can do another
pass later to change the remaining cases.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst'
  2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-15  7:18 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2021-06-18  3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2021-06-18  3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Mackerras, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Christophe Leroy,
	jniethe5, naveen.n.rao, Michael Ellerman
  Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

On Thu, 20 May 2021 13:50:37 +0000 (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'.
> 
> A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc
> instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is
> and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.
> 
> This series cleans it up.
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[01/12] powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr()
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b3a9e523237013477bea914b7fbfbe420428b988
[02/12] powerpc/inst: Reduce casts in get_user_instr()
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9134806e149ebb214f122f0f84254096d3768bb2
[03/12] powerpc/inst: Improve readability of get_user_instr() and friends
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/042e0860e1c1d60a0ab1ff3f16b7f420573133e0
[04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal()
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/036b5560bebc72c61d955ae0b115e8e69da8a563
[05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups)
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/18c85964b10b7b78a5cb59a4959a5f82fdc77e4c
[06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/6c0d181daabcba286db9711eef8800b566fb1cce
[07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests.
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/e90a21ea801d1776d9a786ad02354fd3fe23ce09
[08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/69d4d6e5fd9f4e805280ad831932c3df7b9d7cc7
[09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/077c4dedef09796ade917459a5330e3940fb5860
[10/12] powerpc/optprobes: Minimise casts
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/afd3287c8872142ec4298a2b77bd9077e2209c9c
[11/12] powerpc/optprobes: Compact code source a bit.
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/f38adf86ce4fdae84904f420e175ce5806509c4c
[12/12] powerpc/optprobes: use PPC_RAW_ macros
        https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/0e628ad2d60896de31148fba00cc73623b8c0aa1

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-18  4:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-20 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] powerpc/inst: Fix sparse detection on get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] powerpc/inst: Reduce casts in get_user_instr() Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] powerpc/inst: Improve readability of get_user_instr() and friends Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/inst: Avoid pointer dereferencing in ppc_inst_equal() Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  3:38   ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups) Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  3:41   ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Make instr_is_branch_to_addr() static Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  3:42   ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in tests Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  3:42   ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  2:01   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-15  3:47     ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] powerpc/inst: Refactor PPC32 and PPC64 versions Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  3:48   ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] powerpc/optprobes: Minimise casts Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/optprobes: Compact code source a bit Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] powerpc/optprobes: use PPC_RAW_ macros Christophe Leroy
2021-06-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] powerpc: Cleanup use of 'struct ppc_inst' Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15  7:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-15  7:24   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-16 13:05     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-18  3:51 ` Michael Ellerman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).