From: Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
stable-rt@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@suse.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
carnil@debian.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:52:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD8J---yWGx46DmVUGzvpx5bQTEyYN6aie2HRPkzB71qNp5mLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208144828.y2e2d4h3yincjyqg@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:48 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On 2021-12-08 10:14:41 [-0300], Luis Goncalves wrote:
> > Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
> > the code and missed something that obvious.
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion I caused.
> >
> > Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
> > subjects fixed?
>
> No, I don't think that it is worth it. Please correct it for the next
> release.
> I'm not sure if there is a need for the base version in the patch tag.
Thank you! I will fix that for the next release.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 22:05 [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58 Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2021-12-07 20:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-07 20:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-07 20:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-07 21:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-08 13:14 ` Luis Goncalves
2021-12-08 14:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-08 15:52 ` Luis Goncalves [this message]
2021-12-08 14:42 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAD8J---yWGx46DmVUGzvpx5bQTEyYN6aie2HRPkzB71qNp5mLg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=carnil@debian.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).