From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8ADC32750 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166A72064A for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=endlessm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@endlessm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="weur1ciJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727487AbfHMHPq (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 03:15:46 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:36995 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726282AbfHMHPn (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 03:15:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id y26so105425008qto.4 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=endlessm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g8Vm8qKHn+LLHXv645mJ9CCM93oJwj4ds1tExL4TPwg=; b=weur1ciJNB0c2Ydn/tXH5TbApVTHeLKgj3aUj2q6HtXboQPd5ONcqH8BGCKBDRDvYL l4PpS131R7Z05t/6SzwRzdl98TXxhfxGBGOSKPvIW5g7hznSKr57yC1skkeWOdr6qCxQ ZS26R6N+RJL0/H/WLBByq3BiBJ836eWUFAxrYCRbsO+h4iVBKAvvn95nCM0dpVViiaa/ Jcm5lzaKNFYgah/8x3RG3nq7pUcsOoBkNUQ+YVZTgUS/mENXA+CyGJl5ENdf9QZh5o6q xAqMfHPrcSpfpdZfi8RX3+xC+I4EoFM+NLg9BOuAJGPn99iJt3V5gfzGbzUCr7c7IsvE r9XA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g8Vm8qKHn+LLHXv645mJ9CCM93oJwj4ds1tExL4TPwg=; b=iscQEorKylXDEPYIjoxoNs1qykm3rXAlSoCV15iaIzVKcUYbdSSx9CwYmkghm48ekb 51zRqd7nuXqzNU5ynTe4IUxgVxgnHpPxgXd808TBK8pe9wezUPzaibKWSJFRhcEp3BA0 w7NnwTjzAn30UAVQk3bQQbZHq/vKQxVS/P5EQ6kiW2VIJtoNUrTyMvXxxZvbOYCr8aYS CHy8GPu7a6pKA9dlHEcVPa24D5i+qdf1ejxthQElfarttFCCLjsLvzADYVs72PypTM5+ nHGfPGtjPvQgSYVGTzFpAPjGgyrAnopk4+RE20FNVyQO3KdY+0t/rqOvVapfTwdjXdz2 h+VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlq9GpdTHqkNKvXxNH34QxFnfHh3gePbS3Tq54c9fM0xrvBENK NKGy/zjHfsz691az8tSFzecxBo81a504feVYIII19Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyu0kNB2r7jqKEB5vIzNuhGX7Fl1NvnQaovuv67dupIefbkK72n4H8JPszWbVJkp5kEWzuFvZtmL2YlF/ckPrI= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c688:: with SMTP id d8mr32921143qvj.86.1565680542157; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:15:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190805131452.13257-1-chiu@endlessm.com> <87wofibgk7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Drake Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:15:31 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7] rtl8xxxu: Improve TX performance of RTL8723BU on rtl8xxxu driver To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Kalle Valo , Chris Chiu , David Miller , linux-wireless , netdev , Linux Kernel , Linux Upstreaming Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 PM Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 8/12/19 10:32 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > > This is marked as RFC so I'm not sure what's the plan. Should I apply > > this? > > I think it's at a point where it's worth applying - I kinda wish I had > had time to test it, but I won't be near my stash of USB dongles for a > little while. The last remaining reason it was RFC was pending feedback from Jes, to check that his earlier comments had been adequately addressed. So yes I think it's good to apply now. Thanks, Daniel