From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD26C433E6 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A68964FC3 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229467AbhCKBCG (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:02:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229623AbhCKBBx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:01:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80F8C061760 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id b130so18999079qkc.10 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gz//qG4UKWaU4eBFBftxHoN1DTt9WFPAtbEDzRcy4ZI=; b=m20bJdO+CkdIH+TFxZdxXfjbq+tuRI61Mw/BzmynatBY61+Ak29sP5beKDkKUZNZwC kqV9Ko6EmZR9VIu2a2KuYW3TxCBTTp/lS1kewoCeMfxG2qqC0dvono4Boa6Mg9qJwxze 6noxSfHWyh5vm+O3q+7qxcyxBT0nJMXwvqC8M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gz//qG4UKWaU4eBFBftxHoN1DTt9WFPAtbEDzRcy4ZI=; b=L18S/oYkxmCvtL0onFhN9mZbUN1GMyVEbMKgz+iF2HReRdjMfDbh+SoOPFrCcWvGXd 6aMdeJGlN6S2XI0ZtU0hEJMNU0Yef9n+lC+FGV8eAw/aFveqsxX2pNuGP2kmmZGkIky8 rhjRsgxyHX9xyAy2IEvPPgA5XPCRfGQgdfLph+cVtrgq0Q6BrYjzPE/gpvfI4zJpwYqc bPxmrs49Wb0o8IoBSgu5PxPV8+IWU4XivGSe3loN3nIIbG/qXiF/jRRD8cFNN8KE83Vm BxMDI4kafJo8E/REgYf30I8JiD3vZOFCuXyRXQiRf9XvVGhbeaS/BhAY7fXXMZzC1NuO x83g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gOqh+umJIua1+iEOY8sPTwW+kn2LiG3wkz6uQuG0cEqes+N3f OM2wkZoPbItBseOOIUHoANgJKxcJojnA5g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYxXA/wEMT+WFAGU1ALNUtuXfmYHn4n9sCIwYBqFX2upyB89I0LNonzJ5LKZPACMNFiG8qiA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a353:: with SMTP id m80mr5527286qke.14.1615424511912; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com (mail-yb1-f179.google.com. [209.85.219.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z196sm834845qka.70.2021.03.10.17.01.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id m9so19946001ybk.8 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:aa43:: with SMTP id s61mr8713736ybi.32.1615424510011; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210115224420.1635017-1-dianders@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: From: Doug Anderson Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:01:37 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/panel-simple: Patches for N116BCA-EA1 To: Linus Walleij Cc: Thierry Reding , Sam Ravnborg , Rob Clark , Stephen Boyd , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Rob Herring , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:57 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:47 AM Doug Anderson wrote: > > > I guess what I'd say in summary is: > > > > * If you object to the retries in simple panel, I still hope the rest > > of the series can land. > > > > * If somehow this panel gets out into real users hands and we find > > that the retries are necessary and people still don't want the retries > > in simple panel, I can fork a special panel driver just for it then. > > I'm fine with the retries, if it is needed outside of the "simple" (hm) > panel driver then we can certainly factor it out as a helper or > library. > > I looked at the patches at lore. > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > I see also Stephen has reviewed some patches. > > Tell me if you need me to also apply them to drm-misc. > (I guess yes?) Yes please. I was giving Sam time to do it but I haven't heard from him for a while. Right before you responded I poked Thierry to see if he was available but if you're willing/able to do it then I'm sure it would save him the trouble. If you'd like me to re-post the patches (CCing you) I can. Please let me know. If you happen to feel in an applying mood one other patch to simple-panel I think is OK to land is at: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210222081716.1.I1a45aece5d2ac6a2e73bbec50da2086e43e0862b@changeid -Doug