From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B613C4332F for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 19:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233102AbiK1TCM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 14:02:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32948 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233057AbiK1TCI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 14:02:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6BC26AFA for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:02:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id s5so16688380edc.12 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:02:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AvcsqOLDEgZfhGUaEz8COVF/l5RKQZT/ZHo2hpf2YEs=; b=TZApyyqu3+lIUYq/nIpvz3YAkuyy3nX4GjcLECf52hWQiWYR/jG/KleP0WVpBIfPZh +lSDZJUYBy87YJW+uMGSv0H+zUEEvIDaokUyNjZmg57VaBlufpfhJ4L0j+TteGx40z/S KbYj/LVLnejrHFBFw3V5Alo6g/Yym6mPHamqo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=AvcsqOLDEgZfhGUaEz8COVF/l5RKQZT/ZHo2hpf2YEs=; b=r4yGx8hVL/dH5suvsqSmba58QBorCSDDu8gl0oyJHAVxyjvqpxxxa/iORvPo0Sz1Yb twUioo99FX2k0P1cCUdcYYbxDa6ErPoCwgQKz5hJxkXJBFyJo1AI8vrIdTt+zIGagZcL ZNBSQ4E2dsaN+MWkzQwXSG37CvhLR9XvplRGeCZcb4czmJ9LMHMKOxLWj7ZWG0YSyKfX GoB/1B7fgkPLLnHi8HJrpjhLW1bkHwCEmXXnZwg377j/JO6CC0Gd+aRrvmW24QfqOuBp QXn2wV14d63QDd8Ttz0cE+v8scVGLyzEiyFHq2jYEWJjt/Cou93z+hec/670Tpqm1U+b 3azQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plxJvi6gj5ZE1l3+Zi8B5eDIMLx3IvbYp8CRui05UKranJ/Xkd2 YjicZsAuctXXwLnlEX0mLHY9g25IkCWRnuO+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4qZ8QIIrWrz8wLW0fz90NxTZIRIBQva9Ln4DnEJMY4mbVQakuQ9T227GRp3Mio/X8PWEYGYg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:399a:b0:468:fdf2:477f with SMTP id fk26-20020a056402399a00b00468fdf2477fmr20801736edb.329.1669662125881; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:02:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com. [209.85.221.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k20-20020a17090627d400b007bf5250b515sm2073831ejc.29.2022.11.28.11.02.04 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:02:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id x17so18473999wrn.6 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:02:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd82:0:b0:238:b29e:4919 with SMTP id q2-20020adfcd82000000b00238b29e4919mr32489126wrj.583.1669662124286; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:02:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221124115712.v4.1.Idfcba5344b7995b44b7fa2e20f1aa4351defeca6@changeid> <9fea68d5-cdae-dc94-bd3b-71ba12a23a9b@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <9fea68d5-cdae-dc94-bd3b-71ba12a23a9b@linaro.org> From: Doug Anderson Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:01:52 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add zombie To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: =?UTF-8?B?5qWK5a6X57+w?= , LKML , Bob Moragues , Stephen Boyd , Harvey , Matthias Kaehlcke , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Gavin.Lee@ecs.com.tw, Darren.Chen@ecs.com.tw, Abner.Yen@ecs.com.tw, Vicy.Lee@ecs.com.tw, Jason.Huang@ecs.com.tw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 9:30 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 28/11/2022 16:51, Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > >> > >>> 2. > >>> I notice Kryzysztof say he didn't in cc mail loop at beggin, and below is > >>> my updated mail list: > >>> --- > >>> Series-to: LKML > >>> Series-cc: Douglas Anderson > >>> Series-cc: Bob Moragues > >>> Series-cc: Harvey > >>> Series-cc: Stephen Boyd > >>> Series-cc: Matthias Kaehlcke > >>> Series-cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>> --- > >>> Is there anyone I missed? > >> > >> These are not correct addresses and not complete list of them. Don't > >> invent the entries, don't add there some weird addresses. > >> > >> Use get_maintainers.pl. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. > > > > Just to give context here, I think Owen is using `patman` [0] to send > > patches. Yes, it's part of the u-boot tree but it's designed for > > sending Linux patches too. > > > > By default, that means that get_maintainer is automatically called on > > all patches and those entries are CCed. The extra "Series-cc" just > > lets you add extra people. It's fine to add extra people to patches if > > you think that those people are interested in getting it. > > The tool is just the tool, if it uses get_maintainers.pl, then result > would be correct. The problem was that CC list on v1 and v2: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20221117094251.2.Ibfc4751e4ba044d1caa1f88a16015e7c45c7db65@changeid/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20221122203635.v2.1.Ie05fd439d0b271b927acb25c2a6e41af7a927e90@changeid/ > > As you can notice there easily: > 1. Bjorn's address is wrong > 2. My and Konrad's are missing > > So if you say that get_maintainers.pl were used and tree is not v5.15, > then what else? Certainly on v1 and v2 he was targeting v5.15, not upstream. When I replied to v1 I told him this. Apparently he messed up still on v2. Matthias again pointed it out on v2. After v2, it was corrected. ...so right, you didn't get v1 and v2 and those of us on the email thread pointed that out and it got corrected. I'm not sure what happened to v3, but that seems like yet another mistake and I believe Matthias also commented on this. Here we're on v4 which is correctly tagged as v4 and sent (as far as I can tell) mostly correctly. It makes sense that you're surprised that v4 came without you seeing earlier versions, but given that the error had already been identified and corrected (which is why you got v4 at all) then I don't think we need to keep debugging it, right? -Doug