From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755857AbcFTQZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:25:49 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com ([209.85.213.53]:36012 "EHLO mail-vk0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754469AbcFTQZ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:25:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160620161908.GA30459@google.com> References: <1463092986-61777-1-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org> <5767EB7E.3040606@ti.com> <20160620161908.GA30459@google.com> From: Doug Anderson Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:25:18 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aYP-LO8KGbFte5-BxHCzESIK6yk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] phy: rockchip-emmc: give DLL some extra time to be ready To: Brian Norris Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Ulf Hansson , Heiko Stuebner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Shawn Lin , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Brian Norris , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > + linux-mmc, Ulf > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:41:26PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> On Friday 13 May 2016 04:13 AM, Brian Norris wrote: >> > From: Shawn Lin >> > >> > According to the databook, 10.2us is the max time for dll to be ready to >> > work. However in testing, some chips need 20us for dll to be ready. This >> > patch adds some extra margin for dllrdy to be ready, fixing our >> > -ETIMEDOUT issues. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin >> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris >> >> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I > > Thanks! I take it that to mean you're agreeing with Doug's suggestion > here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/13/1067 > > "Since [the $subject series patches] aren't in 4.7-rc1 presumably they > would also make sense to take through the MMC tree if others agree." > > Ulf, > > I see I didn't CC you or linux-mmc on this patch series. Please let me > know if I should resend, or if you can pick these up off of LKML -- Doug > gave nice patchwork links in his linked series. NB: patch 2 has a > version 2, while the others were left unmodified. I actually need to spin my series to address a small bit of feedback from Heiko. Since Brian's original patches weren't on linux-mmc, I'll include them in my series (along with collected tags) to make it easy. Hope this is OK. -Doug