linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: Refuse DDC/CI transfers on the internal I2C controller
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:12:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XP=3z9GWPU+K15jmzHeOWT9uzqgaC6zL3M+Wm7b4jOhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722181945.244395-1-mka@chromium.org>

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:19 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> The DDC/CI protocol involves sending a multi-byte request to the
> display via I2C, which is typically followed by a multi-byte
> response. The internal I2C controller only allows single byte
> reads/writes or reads of 8 sequential bytes, hence DDC/CI is not
> supported when the internal I2C controller is used. The I2C
> transfers complete without errors, however the data in the response
> is garbage. Abort transfers to/from slave address 0x37 (DDC) with
> -EOPNOTSUPP, to make it evident that the communication is failing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - changed DDC_I2C_ADDR to DDC_CI_ADDR
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> index 045b1b13fd0e..28933629f3c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>
>  #include <media/cec-notifier.h>
>
> +#define DDC_CI_ADDR            0x37
>  #define DDC_SEGMENT_ADDR       0x30
>
>  #define HDMI_EDID_LEN          512
> @@ -322,6 +323,13 @@ static int dw_hdmi_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>         u8 addr = msgs[0].addr;
>         int i, ret = 0;
>
> +       if (addr == DDC_CI_ADDR)
> +               /*
> +                * The internal I2C controller does not support the multi-byte
> +                * read and write operations needed for DDC/CI.
> +                */
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +

In theory we could also solve this by detecting (in other parts of the
function) the bad multi-byte read/write operations.  That would maybe
be more generic (AKA it would more properly handle random userspace
tools fiddling with i2c-dev) but add complexity to the code.

...possibly a better long-term solution is to just totally stop
emulating a regular i2c adapter when the hardware just doesn't support
that.  In theory we could remove the "drm_get_edid()" call in
dw_hdmi_connector_get_modes() and replace it with a direct call to
drm_do_get_edid() if we're using the built-in adapter.  Possibly
"tda998x_drv.c" would be a good reference.  If we did that, we could
remove all the weird / hacky i2c code in this driver.


Since the bigger cleanup seems like a bit much to ask, I'm OK with
this as a stopgap to at least prevent userspace tools from getting
confused.  Thus:

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22 18:19 [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: Refuse DDC/CI transfers on the internal I2C controller Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-07-22 20:12 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2019-07-22 20:54   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-07-22 20:24 ` Sean Paul
2019-07-22 20:57   ` Doug Anderson
2019-07-22 21:02   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-07-25 17:49     ` Sean Paul
2019-07-30 13:38       ` Neil Armstrong
2019-07-30 16:14         ` Sean Paul
2019-07-31  7:38           ` Neil Armstrong
2019-10-02 19:44 Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-10-07 11:54 ` Neil Armstrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=XP=3z9GWPU+K15jmzHeOWT9uzqgaC6zL3M+Wm7b4jOhQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=ajax@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).