From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] alarmtimer: Make alarmtimer platform device child of RTC device
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:32:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XfZC_c_tKQ5pCWwCAdipqpxzfHO-cUDbXFBMt8gaB_1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e1f4235.1c69fb81.7041e.36a0@mx.google.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:47 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2020-01-15 02:07:09)
> > Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes:
> > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:59 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
> > >> index 4b11f0309eee..ccb6aea4f1d4 100644
> > >> --- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
> > >> +++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
> > >> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_rtc_add_device(struct device *dev,
> > >> unsigned long flags;
> > >> struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(dev);
> > >> struct wakeup_source *__ws;
> > >> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> > >> int ret = 0;
> > >>
> > >> if (rtcdev)
> > >> @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_rtc_add_device(struct device *dev,
> > >> return -1;
> > >>
> > >> __ws = wakeup_source_register(dev, "alarmtimer");
> > >> + pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "alarmtimer", -1, NULL, 0);
> > >
> > > Don't you need to check for an error here? If pdev is an error you'll
> > > continue on your merry way. Before your patch if you got an error
> > > registering the device it would have caused probe to fail.
> >
> > Yes, that return value should be checked
> >
>
> Ok. Should __ws also be checked for error? I'm currently thinking of this patch
> and then simplifying it in patch 3 of this series by removing __ws. Or
> the series can swap patch 2 and 3.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
> index ccb6aea4f1d4..3e1f4056e384 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_rtc_add_device(struct device *dev,
> pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "alarmtimer", -1, NULL, 0);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&rtcdev_lock, flags);
> - if (!rtcdev) {
> + if (__ws && pdev && !rtcdev) {
I believe instead of pdev you want !IS_ERR(pdev)
...otherwise this seems sane. I ran out of time last night to get to
patch #3 and #4 but I'll look at them shortly. I don't have tons of
opinions for the ordering questions, so whatever seems cleanest?
-Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 15:59 [PATCH 0/4] Fix alarmtimer suspend failure Stephen Boyd
2020-01-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] alarmtimer: Unregister wakeup source when module get fails Stephen Boyd
2020-01-15 3:40 ` Doug Anderson
2020-01-15 10:24 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Stephen Boyd
2020-01-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] alarmtimer: Make alarmtimer platform device child of RTC device Stephen Boyd
2020-01-15 3:40 ` Doug Anderson
2020-01-15 10:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-15 16:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-15 19:32 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2020-01-15 19:22 ` Doug Anderson
2020-01-17 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] alarmtimer: Use wakeup source from alarmtimer platform device Stephen Boyd
2020-01-15 19:47 ` Doug Anderson
2020-01-09 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] alarmtimer: Always export alarmtimer_get_rtcdev() and update docs Stephen Boyd
2020-01-15 20:31 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAD=FV=XfZC_c_tKQ5pCWwCAdipqpxzfHO-cUDbXFBMt8gaB_1g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ravisadineni@chromium.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).