From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5C0C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230332AbiGMXKF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:10:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230309AbiGMXKC (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:10:02 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1129.google.com (mail-yw1-x1129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00ADA3F326 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1129.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31c8a1e9e33so1004817b3.5 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:10:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K8O302/7c4M+y4oSPuw97osYexdl2kGKky6mRepNyHk=; b=H09N2BCSGmpudE0ji2Q/gaZvJBtiZgN4m8BvrTevY/CHTWDL6gz4rjztzk441wczCU RX4gyudPZ0x6/dcPIjtS/PqA7m1mhDKscwmdHN5W5vsacoMRaca1xaX8Bi9c0vJ7912Y 35miB9lQMLd1D54hGVRZ74ghp5WHLHU3DqsSCrXST6bNWO3IViYh+VjOlJqDoPapciKK B7ndbKU+2YYtw13rtVJZGEvMBwcAMWJwOye8ekF9n9tnm7IFdOyOki4IqzxnTMm2I4P6 CmVlhgirpkFIW2USMZ6EmJ3cqChrEZJsbzK6ZtsZBz+KrDoC4VrgBy2HHOHBzZPFxO6H +T4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K8O302/7c4M+y4oSPuw97osYexdl2kGKky6mRepNyHk=; b=0ZAg8/XthfPJ2Hk1GsnnCxeVBFJLVA7xPaoLtEE/msrCvRpzFuzbxmp6YrhwM9B3NY zAieISQSV1wdbiUo/sLglBYq0yL5oxxXzjT3NzRja1dkvXjUzgpRSsaMFU51OUp/j16I f3xKn1Ti++9+R3jTRRMqINgSvrz171b9SI09zP6Je3sZiydm1MwZujlaNUdeD9MA/M/H Q4cGMWwMuCvpgGB56Q8zphv7R8M0DQDsE7w8aglvrxos+MsHqG57he4DLUrzNRvqAYg8 JcuTnHDlv862ETvmALEQo0kNV3+zwRd2atfxPxZ2F7Ihfh6+DIqVqS2NLrTVKc3YyqRH idog== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9WLZE0n1Rh5TGCaj6KOQMnBp0mAW7wzZqWhUpqQ7EOWJemeH5F zKCvUUmmf1ZukBmwGK1gD8eU10AqT5xIteFzAsDp6+10NSU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ta1KjbW6tgvLYjpf/6k/gpgB7wBMLpjjuGdsSpq+y6Of+DnuhfTohzZB61/WRXkJef9Gp/OdBu/c/GkCpjDpE= X-Received: by 2002:a81:158a:0:b0:31c:a84a:d772 with SMTP id 132-20020a81158a000000b0031ca84ad772mr6811397ywv.233.1657753800010; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:10:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220713050724.GA2471738@roeck-us.net> <20220713225627.GC32544@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20220713225627.GC32544@roeck-us.net> From: Sudip Mukherjee Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:09:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 5.19-rc6 To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Linus Torvalds , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Harry Wentland , Leo Li , Alex Deucher , Balbir Singh , Daniel Axtens , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Kefeng Wang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , amd-gfx list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:56 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:50:06PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:45 PM Linus Torvalds > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:36 PM Sudip Mukherjee > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524025139.40212-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/ > > > > > > > > > > That patch looks sane to me, but I guess Guenter would need to check > > > > > > > > I still see the failure in my builds with this patch. But surprisingly > > > > I dont see the build failure (with or without this patch) with gcc-12, > > > > only with gcc-11. > > > > > > Arrghs. "build failure"? > > > > Uhh.. no, sorry.. I meant the same problem which Guenter reported with > > powerpc64-linux-ld, hard float and soft float. > > But I dont see this problem with gcc-12, only with gcc-11. > > > > Weird. It works for me with gcc 11.3.0 / binutils 2.38 as well as with > gcc 11.2.0 / binutils 2.36.1. Its entirely possible that I have messed up, there are references to many patches in this thread. :) Can you please paste the link of the patch that you say is working for you. I will try a clean build with that. -- Regards Sudip