From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_GREY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54282C33CB1 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B124673 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akorzy-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@akorzy-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="HoP5G4vy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729463AbgANLOr (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 06:14:47 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com ([209.85.167.171]:36162 "EHLO mail-oi1-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725956AbgANLOq (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 06:14:46 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id c16so11446412oic.3 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:14:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akorzy-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ax3PVwosdQPDm4oypRYY3rAUNrnqWJKDsiet5NcHnN4=; b=HoP5G4vyWFCSjPGSGa4TW/xzyS95/o5m1v9WFONFvXaVD+ajm4lRHzq6b8peHIki7t cZsu7G3fW0FKLvEUVCEiQQxGjT5zr5Q8k3rfrOH0rUyO5UuqVn4g2bGMEyqR4GD8SeoE gmB/I4UURAII6hXunqUWLKsXhKhcgKrfuIqBKsbljgKSsTfvGHXObXEmQEfeGQHv4HOi SWapg/Rz610VkvKgxve3vRAw5U2qwiuZMrEp9Txaw1VRiwEleSZhiqZ+Hbspw6opBza+ paD2YkugJkjqJOFvvPqwkM02REeqWkbcILjEkVQmFkBXxAsFmAm0oTduL1boRREGDs1c 3Zuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ax3PVwosdQPDm4oypRYY3rAUNrnqWJKDsiet5NcHnN4=; b=UJVxEM30eEbb3+2mk3uLCJl3QJ3iKyCMayAug9+Lp6NU1gRC3+G/MqFkO4h6aW4Ref oVhskmpmcs9jXsH+WxVDH0R5JqReB7D+HXx6GWDZpx6ZYb8iVU2WSoPg/GwOeuxX7zDu 2Dp8kg3joLogDLdpUfaSgWUPhdeElXEWzfSH+Ngik/vWFjm0l0h6Y2ouip1kSyUKeBPM OdQ6OVmyPfk8XJ7Yn47RKixqNJ2ZXwdNPXZiw49/NVgBIIx/BOvPBEtiOYnSMaRCqcu1 2OII3zCNW54gag1EsrZVwPH7Dqk2UIjM226Quxc7XbInWo1js5FBz0l6MHBDs2iQnBk9 UXEA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVFkB0LRL7eMjw5tawgvb9ykTRjtncbnAg88oI+GPKh56HNzmv aX50EJsnfqbwh7QGI6Ujz/DLN98vMTU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgMmFrDnDoPc8fVNQb7Wl47fB38xEk28p5hjL0b/FDSbth1xWj4TSpN3I+7Dp3M645Rwz1QQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:f1c6:: with SMTP id p189mr16775136oih.159.1579000485801; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com (mail-oi1-f181.google.com. [209.85.167.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm5298201otn.6.2020.01.14.03.14.45 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id p125so11400229oif.10 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:14:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:2118:: with SMTP id 24mr16280185oiz.28.1579000484653; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:14:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Aleksander_Korzy=C5=84ski?= Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:14:37 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Survey results: "open source" vs "free software" vs alternatives To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I conducted a survey of about a 100 US consumers, asking them which term they prefer to describe FOSS. The results are quite interesting. The respondents are not necessarily computer engineers, but rather a representative sample of the general US consumer public. They were given a predefined set of answer choices, which included the well-established terms, as well as some new ones, that I haven't seen used anywhere. They could choose multiple answers. The clear winner is "open-source software" with 49% of respondents selecting the term. It's followed by three new terms: "community-owned software", "community-developed software" and "communal software", obtaining 32%, 29% and 26% of votes respectively. They're then followed by the neutral term "free and open-source software", receiving 24% of the vote. This is followed by the new term "commonhold software", receiving over 15% of the vote. The classic term "free software" was selected by 9.6% of the respondents. It's followed by the alternatives "software libre" and "freedom-respecting software", each one receiving 7.7% of the vote. The least popular choice was "free/libre software", selected only by 2.9% of the respondents. Unsuprisingly, the term "open-source software" is preferred by the public, although it's not clear if it's due to the attractiveness of the term itself or due to the widespread usage of the term. The greatest surprise is the high score of the new terms "community-owned software", "community-developed software", "communal software" and, to a lesser extent, "commonhold software". I wonder if they would score higher if they were in widespread usage. The neutral term "free and open-source software" is also acceptable to the public. The relatively low score of the term "free software" may be a disappointment to some. Its alternatives "software libre" and "freedom-respecting software" scored only a little lower, which suggests they are reasonable alternatives, but another survey on a larger sample may shed more light on the acceptability of these terms to the public. The term "free/libre software" is clearly disliked by the public. Thoughts and comments? The question asked to the respondents was: > What term would you use for computer software that any user can freely modify and share with their friends? In other words, software controlled by the general public. You can select more than one answer - please pick all the answers you like. The results are as follows: Answer Choices Responses Percentage open-source software 51 49.04% community-owned software 33 31.73% community-developed software 30 28.85% communal software 27 25.96% free and open-source software 25 24.04% commonhold software 16 15.38% free software 10 9.62% software libre 8 7.69% freedom-respecting software 8 7.69% free/libre software 3 2.88% Total Respondents: 104 Dated: November 2019 The survey panel of US consumers was provided by an independent contractor. Full results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-C822DGTW7/ Best regards, Aleksander Korzynski