From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752357AbaEUOJD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 21 May 2014 10:09:03 -0400
Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:55361 "EHLO
	mail-vc0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752259AbaEUOJA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 May 2014 10:09:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAE7qMrrH5Yeya9gKx+gbi1w39mJoEj9xw4mh3D86dLaKsWWLSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1398524543-15012-1-git-send-email-madcatxster@devoid-pointer.net>
	<1c6140633925b0838b7627e071e80761.squirrel@mungewell.org>
	<537BFEBF.8010601@logitech.com>
	<2643156.2tkLFqgYFg@sigyn>
	<CAE7qMrrH5Yeya9gKx+gbi1w39mJoEj9xw4mh3D86dLaKsWWLSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:08:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CADbOyBTm73_EJJcn_Abu-ZofqiHSgzB1TQMUtcMR_042SyOkyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/24] input: Add ff-memless-next module
From: Elias Vanderstuyft <elias.vds@gmail.com>
To: Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@logitech.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFsIE1hbMO9?= <madcatxster@devoid-pointer.net>,
        Roland Bosa <rbosa@logitech.com>, Simon Wood <simon@mungewell.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Nestor Lopez Casado
<nlopezcasad@logitech.com> wrote:
> Elias, Simon, Michal,
>
> It is unfortunate that we didn't get back to  you in 2013 when you
> asked for help in reverse engineering, oftentimes we have conflicting
> priorities and a particular request may be left laying around for some
> time before being addressed. But please, don't hesitate to re-kick us
> if you feel we are not being reactive.
>
> Let me clearly say that our intentions are to disclose as much
> information as possible and to help the community in having great
> support to all our hardware across all platforms. We have zero problem
> with being asked for information.

OK, thanks for your reply.
Don't worry, I understand ;)

Elias