linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem on SCTP
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:06:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_cH1zGzYCFcuCM9SoXMk8bLwndyY7YW4+x=JsOjmYet9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFXGftK4S-6wUzv=mL4NyONExH+-s2dNyF-noFLEyVzbF0cPkg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, can I confirm that the problem is on the Linux router itself or on
> both server and client?
>
try with a new kernel in router, like build and install a upstream
kernel on your route machine.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git

https://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild :
part "Setting up your kernel configuration" and
part "Building the kernel"

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> does this fixed in RHEL7?
>> yes, I think so.
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Xin
>>>>>
>>>>> do you mean we need to patch the kernel?
>>>> Yups, pls comment on that bz if it's really needed for your env.
>>>> A z-stream kernel may be available for that issue soon.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the router is actually is a linux running on RHEL6.8
>>>>>>> (2.6.32-642.4.2.el6.x86_64). it uses iptables to do SNAT aand DNAT
>>>>>>> forward.
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412038
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sctp_manip_pkt->sctp_compute_cksum:
>>>>>>     struct sctphdr *sh = sctp_hdr(sub);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But in rhel6, skb->transport_header is not yet set at that time.
>>>>>> This patch should be backported into rhel6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 21d1196a35f5686c4323e42a62fdb4b23b0ab4a3
>>>>>> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>>>>>> Date:   Mon Jul 15 20:03:19 2013 -0700
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     ipv4: set transport header earlier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sorry to get back late, the platform is running on KVM. and this
>>>>>>>>> problem is resolved by moving to VMware environment, however,  a new
>>>>>>>>> problem is coming out, we noticed that the HB REQ is being ABORT from
>>>>>>>>> client.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 03:32:35.233572 IP 10.165.250.22.3868 > 192.168.2.13.40001: sctp (1)
>>>>>>>>> [HB REQ] (from server to sctp router)
>>>>>>>>> 03:32:35.233603 IP 192.168.2.14.3868 > 192.168.2.13.40001: sctp (1)
>>>>>>>>> [HB REQ] (from sctp router to client)
>>>>>>>>> 03:32:35.233852 IP 192.168.2.13.40001 > 192.168.2.14.3868: sctp (1)
>>>>>>>>> [ABORT] (from client to sctp router)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 03:32:37.928679 IP 10.165.250.22.3868 > 192.168.2.13.40001: sctp (1) [HB REQ]
>>>>>>>>> 03:32:37.928717 IP 192.168.2.14.3868 > 192.168.2.13.40001: sctp (1) [HB REQ]
>>>>>>>>> 03:32:37.929247 IP 192.168.2.13.40001 > 192.168.2.14.3868: sctp (1) [ABORT]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the above packet flow, 10.165.250.22 is the server and
>>>>>>>>> 192.168.2.13 is the client, the server 10.165.250.22 sends HB REQ to
>>>>>>>>> client 192.168.2.13 through 192.168.2.14 (the SCTP router), and the
>>>>>>>>> SCTP router change the src address before forward the HB REQ to the
>>>>>>>>> client.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But somehow the client is ABORT the HB REQ, any idea? is it related to
>>>>>>>>> the HEARTBEAT information? or the checksum again>?
>>>>>>>> The incorrect checksum won't cause ABORT, but the abnormal HB REQ
>>>>>>>> could be, if HB information was modified when calculating the checksum
>>>>>>>> on router, the ABORT may be caused in client process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is your SCTP router linux ? if yes, what's the kernel version ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Michael Tuexen
>>>>>>>>> <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Jan 2017, at 10:43, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your router does NOT change any field in the SCTP packet, but the
>>>>>>>>>>> SCTP checksum was modified from
>>>>>>>>>>>   Checksum: 0xbaea49e5 (not verified)
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>   Checksum: 0xa9a86d3f (not verified)
>>>>>>>>>>> At least one of these is wrong. Read the tracefiles in wireshark and
>>>>>>>>>>> enable checksum validation and wireshark will tell you which one is
>>>>>>>>>>> correct. (That is why I asked for .pcap file instead of a .txt).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My guess is that the initial checksum is correct and your box middlebox
>>>>>>>>>>> not only changes the destination address and ttl field and header
>>>>>>>>>>> checksum in the IP-header (which is expected) but also incorrectly the
>>>>>>>>>>> SCTP checksum. Since no field in the SCTP packet has changed, the checksum
>>>>>>>>>>> must be the same.
>>>>>>>>>> At the server have a look at the SNMP counters:
>>>>>>>>>> cat /proc/net/sctp/snmp
>>>>>>>>>> You should find a line staring with
>>>>>>>>>> SctpChecksumErrors
>>>>>>>>>> If the number reported there is positive, the node received packets
>>>>>>>>>> with checksum errors.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Jan 2017, at 04:29, Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Frame 2: 98 bytes on wire (784 bits), 98 bytes captured (784 bits)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Encapsulation type: Ethernet (1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Arrival Time: Jan  6, 2017 16:52:49.662321000 Malay Peninsula Standard Time
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Time shift for this packet: 0.000000000 seconds]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Epoch Time: 1483692769.662321000 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Time delta from previous captured frame: 0.000179000 seconds]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Time delta from previous displayed frame: 0.000179000 seconds]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Time since reference or first frame: 0.000179000 seconds]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Frame Number: 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Frame Length: 98 bytes (784 bits)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Capture Length: 98 bytes (784 bits)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Frame is marked: False]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Frame is ignored: False]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Protocols in frame: eth:ethertype:ip:sctp]
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ethernet II, Src: Vmware_81:41:6b (00:50:56:81:41:6b), Dst:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vmware_81:a6:a3 (00:50:56:81:a6:a3)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Destination: Vmware_81:a6:a3 (00:50:56:81:a6:a3)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Address: Vmware_81:a6:a3 (00:50:56:81:a6:a3)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique
>>>>>>>>>>>> address (factory default)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Source: Vmware_81:41:6b (00:50:56:81:41:6b)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Address: Vmware_81:41:6b (00:50:56:81:41:6b)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique
>>>>>>>>>>>> address (factory default)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Type: IPv4 (0x0800)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.206.83, Dst: 192.168.206.66
>>>>>>>>>>>>   0100 .... = Version: 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>   .... 0101 = Header Length: 20 bytes (5)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Differentiated Services Field: 0x02 (DSCP: CS0, ECN: ECT(0))
>>>>>>>>>>>>       0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       .... ..10 = Explicit Congestion Notification: ECN-Capable
>>>>>>>>>>>> Transport codepoint '10' (2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Total Length: 84
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Identification: 0x0000 (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Flags: 0x02 (Don't Fragment)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       0... .... = Reserved bit: Not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>       .1.. .... = Don't fragment: Set
>>>>>>>>>>>>       ..0. .... = More fragments: Not set
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Fragment offset: 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Time to live: 63
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Protocol: SCTP (132)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Header checksum: 0x1d3d [validation disabled]
>>>>>>>>>>>>       [Good: False]
>>>>>>>>>>>>       [Bad: False]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Source: 192.168.206.83
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Destination: 192.168.206.66
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Source GeoIP: Unknown]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Destination GeoIP: Unknown]
>>>>>>>>>>>> Stream Control Transmission Protocol, Src Port: 50001 (50001), Dst
>>>>>>>>>>>> Port: 3868 (3868)
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Source port: 50001
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Destination port: 3868
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Verification tag: 0x00000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>   [Assocation index: 0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Checksum: 0xa9a86d3f (not verified)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   INIT chunk (Outbound streams: 3000, inbound streams: 3000)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Chunk type: INIT (1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>           0... .... = Bit: Stop processing of the packet
>>>>>>>>>>>>           .0.. .... = Bit: Do not report
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Chunk flags: 0x00
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Chunk length: 52
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Initiate tag: 0xe79f40cb
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Advertised receiver window credit (a_rwnd): 62464
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Number of outbound streams: 3000
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Number of inbound streams: 3000
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Initial TSN: 176990880
>>>>>>>>>>>>       IPv4 address parameter (Address: 192.168.206.83)
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter type: IPv4 address (0x0005)
>>>>>>>>>>>>               0... .... .... .... = Bit: Stop processing of chunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>               .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter length: 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>           IP Version 4 address: 192.168.206.83
>>>>>>>>>>>>       IPv4 address parameter (Address: 192.168.1.83)
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter type: IPv4 address (0x0005)
>>>>>>>>>>>>               0... .... .... .... = Bit: Stop processing of chunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>               .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter length: 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>           IP Version 4 address: 192.168.1.83
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Supported address types parameter (Supported types: IPv6, IPv4)
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter type: Supported address types (0x000c)
>>>>>>>>>>>>               0... .... .... .... = Bit: Stop processing of chunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>               .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter length: 8
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Supported address type: IPv6 address (6)
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Supported address type: IPv4 address (5)
>>>>>>>>>>>>       ECN parameter
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter type: ECN (0x8000)
>>>>>>>>>>>>               1... .... .... .... = Bit: Skip parameter and continue
>>>>>>>>>>>> processing of the chunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>               .0.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do not report
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter length: 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Forward TSN supported parameter
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter type: Forward TSN supported (0xc000)
>>>>>>>>>>>>               1... .... .... .... = Bit: Skip parameter and continue
>>>>>>>>>>>> processing of the chunk
>>>>>>>>>>>>               .1.. .... .... .... = Bit: Do report
>>>>>>>>>>>>           Parameter length: 4
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>>>>>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>>>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
>>>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-27 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-06  9:34 Problem on SCTP Sun Paul
2017-01-06 11:43 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-01-09  2:06   ` Sun Paul
2017-01-06 12:37 ` Neil Horman
2017-01-09  2:08   ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09  2:30     ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09  9:51     ` David Laight
2017-01-09 10:00       ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09 12:25         ` Neil Horman
2017-01-09 16:31           ` Sun Paul
2017-01-09 19:18             ` Neil Horman
2017-01-10  1:30               ` Sun Paul
2017-01-10  1:31                 ` Sun Paul
2017-01-10 14:33                 ` Neil Horman
2017-01-11  8:39                   ` Sun Paul
2017-01-11 12:57                     ` Neil Horman
2017-01-12  9:30                       ` Sun Paul
2017-01-12  9:51                         ` David Laight
2017-01-12 10:53                           ` Michael Tuexen
2017-01-13  3:27                             ` Sun Paul
2017-01-13  3:27                               ` Sun Paul
2017-01-13  3:29                               ` Sun Paul
2017-01-13  9:43                                 ` Michael Tuexen
2017-01-13 13:19                                   ` Michael Tuexen
2017-02-21  4:26                                     ` Sun Paul
2017-02-21 15:53                                       ` Xin Long
2017-02-22  1:12                                         ` Sun Paul
2017-02-22  2:00                                           ` Xin Long
2017-02-22  2:29                                             ` Sun Paul
2017-02-22  3:03                                               ` Xin Long
2017-02-23  5:30                                                 ` Sun Paul
2017-02-23  6:07                                                   ` Xin Long
2017-02-27  9:01                                                     ` Sun Paul
2017-02-27 15:06                                                       ` Xin Long [this message]
2017-03-01  4:15                                                         ` Sun Paul
2017-03-01  6:43                                                           ` Xin Long
2017-01-16 18:47                                   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADvbK_cH1zGzYCFcuCM9SoXMk8bLwndyY7YW4+x=JsOjmYet9g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=paulrbk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).