From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: perf script doesn't dump a normal call trace
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 15:36:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dNN34=5V3qtk3_vBzKNts55ACR4c-erPafgNuAQ-eRuw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On upstream kernel(4.19) or RHEL-8 kernel(4.18.0):
# perf record -e 'skb:consume_skb' -ag
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.612 MB perf.data (634 samples) ]
# perf script
swapper 0 [009] 274370.117711: skb:consume_skb: skbaddr=0xffff962c591d5b00
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
kworker/9:1-eve 926 [009] 274370.117729: skb:consume_skb:
skbaddr=0xffff962c591d5b00
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
kworker/9:1-eve 926 [009] 274370.117732: skb:consume_skb:
skbaddr=0xffff962c591d4900
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
swapper 0 [009] 274370.145528: skb:consume_skb: skbaddr=0xffff962c591d4900
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
kworker/9:1-eve 926 [009] 274370.145545: skb:consume_skb:
skbaddr=0xffff962c591d4900
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
kworker/9:1-eve 926 [009] 274370.145547: skb:consume_skb:
skbaddr=0xffff962c591d5b00
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
swapper 0 [009] 274370.173443: skb:consume_skb: skbaddr=0xffff962c591d5b00
ffffffffa4abe534 consume_skb+0x64 ([kernel.kallsyms])
On RHEL-7 kernel(3.10.0):
# perf record -e 'skb:consume_skb' -ag
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.170 MB perf.data (214 samples) ]
# perf script
swapper 0 [001] 69006.726193: skb:consume_skb: skbaddr=0xffff917db9647900
7fffb3425a00 consume_skb ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb34ba3cb arp_process ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb34bad65 arp_rcv ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343b6d9 __netif_receive_skb_core ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343b9d8 __netif_receive_skb ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343ba60 netif_receive_skb_internal ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343c6e8 napi_gro_receive ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffc007d1f5 virtnet_poll ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343c07f net_rx_action ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2ea2f05 __do_softirq ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb357a32c call_softirq ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2e30675 do_softirq ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2ea3285 irq_exit ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb357b5e6 __irqentry_text_start ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb356d362 ret_from_intr ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb356c12e default_idle ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2e386f0 arch_cpu_idle ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2efe3ba cpu_startup_entry ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2e59db7 start_secondary ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2e020d5 start_cpu ([kernel.kallsyms])
swapper 0 [001] 69006.754090: skb:consume_skb: skbaddr=0xffff917db9647100
7fffb3425a00 consume_skb ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb34ba3cb arp_process ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb34bad65 arp_rcv ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343b6d9 __netif_receive_skb_core ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343b9d8 __netif_receive_skb ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343ba60 netif_receive_skb_internal ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343c6e8 napi_gro_receive ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffc007d1f5 virtnet_poll ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb343c07f net_rx_action ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2ea2f05 __do_softirq ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb357a32c call_softirq ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2e30675 do_softirq ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2ea3285 irq_exit ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb357b5e6 __irqentry_text_start ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb356d362 ret_from_intr ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb356c12e default_idle ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2e386f0 arch_cpu_idle ([kernel.kallsyms])
7fffb2efe3ba cpu_startup_entry ([kernel.kallsyms])
any idea why I could get a proper call trace on the new kernel?
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2018-11-02 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-02 6:36 Xin Long [this message]
2018-11-02 10:26 ` perf script doesn't dump a normal call trace Jiri Olsa
2018-11-03 9:36 ` Xin Long
2018-11-04 19:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-11-05 6:20 ` Xin Long
2018-11-05 8:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-11-06 8:22 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADvbK_dNN34=5V3qtk3_vBzKNts55ACR4c-erPafgNuAQ-eRuw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).