From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ABEC43217 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 01:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B51B60551 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 01:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234393AbhKLBoz (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 20:44:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38964 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231918AbhKLBow (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 20:44:52 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x542.google.com (mail-ed1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F9AC061766; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:42:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x542.google.com with SMTP id m14so31632141edd.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:42:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C1DKB9QPoswajpoT5zwf2dnAIQyIiBvEOX2LE4AoRaM=; b=FnY0Zq7uRksikoidOWVyVjuGm/jR9uhk4UCwmn0o1Akz2lm95Gf/LcTNcQ2qxvzItP tzOr3zpPMZhgSybA4LXXWUu0e0AZNv++csiJnLgKpv6wJ+BmaxbPhh+T05x+qt7cT+Mo zHQl6az9oVOlLbXH8i4CIcqgsZm7NphhUwtHxzUxyA4lbVfZTOZNe5127pMdmwBOlJph HpIBKNGb6+MUF0Zi1Xx7jE4rvoPj3FodqMzqPFpUz78Wb/zxqioQcXuvZhwiWLBUSvl6 ocUPUnmzloUzkrpUaUr1+x70bZjz2EQkae0ydSa4ZSyRHkDtz3MwHWyoRl/VcZrOJOBb z29g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C1DKB9QPoswajpoT5zwf2dnAIQyIiBvEOX2LE4AoRaM=; b=ZDEHAfiJElNGoBRzHNpeOLxHLh7hmhlrFYdK2IvmJRay8GFHqS7J3sE6qmuTGNsmJW Je2VnNqgjAyrcjVI04XtwTEoosAdIxlwkNdyJ+fZQmty2cn81494LNTPL9Bv07UfTOLk O8tun5R1IKMMj6/ixOoyMtC7CbSMJxLPc6zqfdH44jT53+s4A+niOmNyKx/lzef+8oQm DpC1cVDZzAxELDERNuutL0QHHO7Kd2m3e/p9fwF6Y5I5piQThZly0TXTz9HUXKK2vo9j +gNPkJ8K+3tKtGgrOMIWKnB2rHK6mVls1pUqP0FnBgNZ4miuIRpDgTfDEQxbIskBqkG4 IoyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vVvnihTagFdkkB96g2fqEZ/SvKcrqrh+nye6+Qn6fTs+9q9fS LcSmz4Nd0wMjYLqmOlDzAfgo69NWFMme+zvB2w2CSXZG17s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp+brCCHZoPLdQuR+DxpRxnrLERSJSAhhfU+xiBwZFo4TJH6AZLKCNbvNQ4g2Yv49NsVzKbX/5HHTyvjO5yBY= X-Received: by 2002:a50:da48:: with SMTP id a8mr15904831edk.146.1636681321216; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:42:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211111133530.2156478-1-imagedong@tencent.com> <20211111060827.5906a2f9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20211111060827.5906a2f9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Menglong Dong Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:40:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: snmp: tracepoint support for snmp To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: David Miller , Steven Rostedt , mingo@redhat.com, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , dsahern@kernel.org, Menglong Dong , LKML , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:08 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > [...] > > I feel like I have seen this idea before. Is this your first posting? > > Would you mind including links to previous discussion if you're aware > of any? This is the first time that I post this patch. Do you mean that someone else has done this before? Sorry, I didn't find it~ > > Regardless: > > > # Form letter - net-next is closed > > We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.16 > and therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features, > code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting > bug fixes only. > > Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.16-rc1 is cut. > Ok, I'll repost it later. By the way, is this idea acceptable? In fact, I also introduced the snmp-tracepoint for ICMP, TCP and IP. Thanks! Menglong Dong > Look out for the announcement on the mailing list or check: > http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html > > RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.