From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D872C43216 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 03:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765B160BD3 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 03:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237087AbhIBDiu (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 23:38:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41506 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232770AbhIBDis (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 23:38:48 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com (mail-oo1-xc35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87E5C061760 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id g4-20020a4ab044000000b002900bf3b03fso129677oon.1 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:37:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:user-agent:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=jTP/sG1HuvFKXr+3xQRfYJQh8HDh4ZXkCSrzx8/zILA=; b=jK7DTpWCdzZ36LyxOqDmYAbosBcu7xVDGahQiC+dPcCbJm11HRmSPMvWnxO4jb9FoC zpiJgMN95jn/Oc5IzsDVNWDhubX5S1Sc7DzgSaAsbs5TSEAZlT3dUI1sS9jKsdKd/A8N orgpEHbC32aA5KkyoJautVtKk4qX6Dw5/yrZA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jTP/sG1HuvFKXr+3xQRfYJQh8HDh4ZXkCSrzx8/zILA=; b=E7w6t3POdG5RiQYVHQXqKr4eQGVrf5yHhpHCfHSxfy8Yppi99Fo8FP5sghjLbC43rp uJkPY0t07r9SGmNF5WWA24q9uP0VzU2jO5QjRx8jGnB53tz/j7rIfpoZlaobih5R9vnN yc4JmuMk7oCY/SOS4n/MqzEuk37trsE0gqMO9gQn2BSKyfk0Jqo9siLoi9ZJjUdq8rsB dpIa0+IP4iyX5CAESs5A+IY9I3QosF8Ij9znW8vcQA3yApqImDfI9mtEDbpWChyLFuxZ 9cjo/5OWMea3VBq+R8BIlM7Z2cQwqH8L07sJpl8Dr95yx0u8SKWs2/K1kb56rMF1RtM0 tXZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oSDaBMF+ZH3buZA/fReDbhLOtT9ynEvled3MfY/t7MrRszB2O XPgEhZ9Zl4UO3W/ghvhjfFJdtcYpcRGasaPfriOijA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWjgk6/3pIlbxH85C1ptiNv0bNKyYD19/tfQg0xIqiQUFjM2i0BdYDC3Ps5LwCFqpjGowDB1MlUFcs5zuH4TM= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:a98c:: with SMTP id w12mr910632oom.29.1630553870182; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:37:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5be25c9710b7706cff91f1db71f9e25e@codeaurora.org> References: <1628830531-14648-1-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org> <1628830531-14648-2-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org> <4af8171aefd6f0387438225666ec1ccc@codeaurora.org> <6801879ddd0edf9a8d0e3605f3868e79@codeaurora.org> <5be25c9710b7706cff91f1db71f9e25e@codeaurora.org> From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:37:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: correct parent irqspec translation To: skakit@codeaurora.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Rob Herring , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , David Collins , Kiran Gunda , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting skakit@codeaurora.org (2021-08-17 22:26:18) > On 2021-08-18 00:45, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting skakit@codeaurora.org (2021-08-17 02:06:42) > >> On 2021-08-17 02:38, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > > >> > Are there any boards supported upstream that have a gpio block that > >> > isn't at 0xc000? > >> > >> yes, all the pmics used in sm8350-mtp.dts board have gpio block at > >> addresses different than 0xc000. > >> > > > > So maybe > > > > Fixes: f67cc6a91d88 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350-mtp: Add PMICs") > > > > is appropriate then? > > This patch is actually fixing the pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c driver. > So, I think we should add > > Fixes: ca69e2d165eb ("qcom: spmi-gpio: add support for hierarchical IRQ > chip") OK. Were you going to resend this patch? I don't see it in linux-next so I worry that Linus dropped it while the Fixes tag was figured out.