From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935451Ab3DHShJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:37:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com ([209.85.210.170]:55855 "EHLO mail-ia0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934738Ab3DHShH (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:37:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51626D3D.4000907@redhat.com> References: <1365113821-22749-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1365113821-22749-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <51626D3D.4000907@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:37:06 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0bB0aOBOeRbJDonrQzvl8xczMHk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically From: Yinghai Lu To: Dave Young Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , WANG Chao , Vivek Goyal , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Dave Young wrote: >> We have now modified crashkernel=X to allocate memory beyong 4G (if >> available) and do not allocate low range for crashkernel if the user >> does not specify that with crashkernel_low=Y. This causes regression >> if iommu is not enabled. Without iommu, swiotlb needs to be setup in >> first 4G and there is no low memory available to second kernel. > > Is it possible to reuse the 1st kernel swiotlb region in 2nd capture > kernel if it's available? If the first kernel is using intel iommu, and swiotlb is freed after intel iommus is enabled in first kernel. > >> >> Set crashkernel_low automatically if the user does not specify that. >> >> For system that does support IOMMU with kdump properly, user could >> specify crashkernel_low=0 to save that 72M low ram. > > How about make swiotlb size tunable in 1st kernel as well such as adding > a swiotlb_size= to cmdline, if it's set in 1st kernel crashkernel > reserving code can take it automaticlly. > can not understand this. Thanks Yinghai