From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752304Ab3FZX4G (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:56:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]:60144 "EHLO mail-ie0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750843Ab3FZX4E (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:56:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1372177330-28013-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1372177330-28013-7-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:56:03 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C-WDNtAJYqVrqXi-8tpCyOOsb94 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/PCI: quirk Thunderbolt PCI-to-PCI bridges From: Yinghai Lu To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Mika Westerberg , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jesse Barnes , "Ronciak, John" , "Penner, Miles J" , Bruce Allan , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Heikki Krogerus , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Mika Westerberg >>>> wrote: >>>>> Thunderbolt PCI-to-PCI bridges typically use BIOS "assisted" enumeration. >>>>> This means that the BIOS will allocate bridge resources based on some >>>>> assumptions of a maximum Thunderbolt chain. It also disables native PCIe >>>>> hotplug of the root port where the Thunderbolt host router is connected. >> ... >> During acpi hotplug, firmare could do extra help for us like assign >> some resources to pci device bars, so it is NOT "boot-time". > > Really? How can firmware assign BARs at hotplug-time? I mean, > obviously firmware *can* write things to the BARs before giving the > device to the OS, but how would it know what to write? should be acpi code, or SMI code or even BMC firmware via sideband. > I assume the > OS owns the address space, and it can change the upstream bridge > windows or the BARs of another device on the bus at any time, subject > to the OS's own issues as far as quiescing or unbinding drivers, etc., > but without coordinating with the BIOS. for thunderbolt or dock with acpiphp, then all children devices/bridges should not have drivers loaded yet. Yinghai