From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752311AbbC1UTc (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:19:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181]:34836 "EHLO mail-ig0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752024AbbC1UT3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:19:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150328.111621.1041514784349808716.davem@davemloft.net> References: <551495EE.20201@oracle.com> <20150328.111621.1041514784349808716.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:19:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yyP_JV_1wmX_uMf5e8nVFgM7wag Message-ID: Subject: Re: d63e2e1f3df breaks sparc/T5-8 From: Yinghai Lu To: David Miller Cc: David Ahern , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David Miller wrote: > PCI addresses being 64-bit or not is an attribute of the PCI > controller and the geography of the bridges behind it, not the > cpu architecture. Good point. We should add one choice in pci subsystem Kconfig. Thanks Yinghai