From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756175Ab2K1VGl (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:06:41 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:34932 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755690Ab2K1VGk (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:06:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121128205733.GA13915@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1353123563-3103-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <20121127211755.GC10391@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20121128193523.GA18843@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20121128205733.GA13915@phenom.dumpdata.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:06:37 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0yLVrGbo5MYNQiHTJi9iu6zw8F0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/46] x86, mm: map ram from top-down with BRK and memblock. From: Yinghai Lu To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jacob Shin , Andrew Morton , Stefano Stabellini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:47:51AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> wrote: >> > >> > Have done so. I really like how the top-down mechanism works. It is pretty neat! >> > >> > Yinghai, I had mostly just comments about the patch descriptions - I would >> > appreciate it you could modify the patches to address the little nitpicks I >> > spotted. And while doing that you can stick >> > 'Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ' on all patches. >> > >> > For the "x86, mm, Xen: Remove mapping_pagetable_reserve()" >> > you can also put 'Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ' >> >> Thanks a lot for reviewing. Will update those changelog, and add >> acked-by and reviewed by... >> >> BTW, can you please check my for-x86-boot branch that will allow >> bzImage to be loaded above 4G on 64bit platform by 64 bit bootloader. > > Is there a specific boot loader I should try it out with? I am using > pxeboot and multiboot right now. only updated kexec could load high. but i changed to use early_memmap to copy boot_params and command line for 64bit. Not sure if it will break xen. > >> Hope it does not break Xen dom0 and domU. > > Any specific guest configs? 4G 8G 12G 30G? 8G should be enough.