From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754568AbbCaS0S (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:26:18 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]:37919 "EHLO mail-ig0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752415AbbCaSZ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:25:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150331.141911.1147249607585406404.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150331.110636.1386273674508393491.davem@davemloft.net> <20150331.141911.1147249607585406404.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:25:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZWklmbSGuc_N1S2KR70i-oso_J0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: d63e2e1f3df breaks sparc/T5-8 From: Yinghai Lu To: David Miller Cc: David Ahern , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:19 AM, David Miller wrote: > I totally disagree, I think your test is too stringent and should be > significantly relaxed if not removed entirely. ok, will produce one version that only verify first criteria. Thanks Yinghai