linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/11] locking/mutex: make mutex::wait_lock irq safe
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:30:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YRSj3T7MY1qu=hy7+Wf=p34bBKnCLfE7vMJUmFbg0wCKA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221003214501.2050087-5-connoro@google.com>

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 5:45 PM Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com> wrote:
>
> From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
>
> mutex::wait_lock might be nested under rq->lock.
>
> Make it irq safe then.

Hi Juri, can you give an example where not doing this is an issue?

When nested under rq->lock, interrupts should already be disabled,
otherwise try_to_wake_up() from an interrupt can cause a deadlock no?
Then, why do you need this patch?

Thanks.



> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181009092434.26221-7-juri.lelli@redhat.com
> [rebase & fix {un,}lock_wait_lock helpers in ww_mutex.h]
> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/mutex.c    | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> index 7800380219db..f39e9ee3c4d0 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
>  {
>         struct mutex_waiter waiter;
>         struct ww_mutex *ww;
> +       unsigned long flags;
>         int ret;
>
>         if (!use_ww_ctx)
> @@ -614,7 +615,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
>                 return 0;
>         }
>
> -       raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>         /*
>          * After waiting to acquire the wait_lock, try again.
>          */
> @@ -676,7 +677,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
>                                 goto err;
>                 }
>
> -               raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +               raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>                 if (ww_ctx)
>                         ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
>                 schedule_preempt_disabled();
> @@ -703,9 +704,9 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
>                         trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX);
>                 }
>
> -               raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +               raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>         }
> -       raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>  acquired:
>         __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>
> @@ -732,7 +733,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
>         if (ww_ctx)
>                 ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
>
> -       raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>         if (ww_ctx)
>                 ww_ctx_wake(ww_ctx);
>         preempt_enable();
> @@ -743,7 +744,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
>         __mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
>  err_early_kill:
>         trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
> -       raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>         debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
>         mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
>         if (ww_ctx)
> @@ -915,6 +916,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
>         struct task_struct *next = NULL;
>         DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
>         unsigned long owner;
> +       unsigned long flags;
>
>         mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
>
> @@ -941,7 +943,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>         debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
>         if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) {
>                 /* get the first entry from the wait-list: */
> @@ -959,7 +961,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
>                 __mutex_handoff(lock, next);
>
>         preempt_disable();
> -       raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>
>         wake_up_q(&wake_q);
>         preempt_enable();
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
> index dfc174cd96c6..7edd55d10f87 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
> +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
> @@ -70,14 +70,14 @@ __ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct mutex *lock)
>         return atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS;
>  }
>
> -static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
> +static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
>  {
> -       raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, *flags);
>  }
>
> -static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
> +static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock, unsigned long flags)
>  {
> -       raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>  }
>
>  static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct mutex *lock)
> @@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ __ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
>         return rt_mutex_has_waiters(&lock->rtmutex);
>  }
>
> -static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> +static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long *flags)
>  {
> -       raw_spin_lock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock, *flags);
>  }
>
> -static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> +static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, flags)
>  {
> -       raw_spin_unlock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
> +       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock, flags);
>  }
>
>  static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
>  static __always_inline void
>  ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
>  {
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
>         ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx);
>
>         /*
> @@ -409,9 +411,9 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
>          * Uh oh, we raced in fastpath, check if any of the waiters need to
>          * die or wound us.
>          */
> -       lock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
> +       lock_wait_lock(&lock->base, &flags);
>         __ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx);
> -       unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
> +       unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base, flags);
>  }
>
>  static __always_inline int
> --
> 2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-13  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-03 21:44 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Reviving the Proxy Execution Series Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] locking/ww_mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock Connor O'Brien
2022-10-04 16:01   ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 23:54     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-20 18:43     ` Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] kernel/locking: Add p->blocked_on wrapper Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] locking/mutex: make mutex::wait_lock irq safe Connor O'Brien
2022-10-13  4:30   ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] sched: Split scheduler execution context Connor O'Brien
2022-10-14 17:01   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-19 17:17   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-10-20 18:43     ` Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] kernel/locking: Expose mutex_owner() Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] sched: Add proxy execution Connor O'Brien
2022-10-12  1:54   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-12  9:46     ` Juri Lelli
2022-10-14 17:07     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-15 13:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-16 20:48       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-10-17  4:03         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-17  7:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-24 22:33           ` Qais Yousef
2022-10-25 11:19             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-25 22:10               ` Qais Yousef
2022-10-15 15:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-15 15:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-15 15:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-15 15:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-24 10:13   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-10-29  3:31     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-31 16:39       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-10-31 18:00         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-04 17:09           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-11-21  0:22             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-21  1:49               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-21  3:59                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-22 18:45                   ` Joel Fernandes
2023-01-09  8:51   ` Chen Yu
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] sched: Fixup task CPUs for potential proxies Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:44 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] sched/rt: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability Connor O'Brien
2022-10-10 11:40   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-10-14 22:32     ` Connor O'Brien
2022-10-19 17:05       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-10-20 13:30         ` Juri Lelli
2022-10-20 16:14           ` Valentin Schneider
2022-10-21  2:22         ` Connor O'Brien
2022-10-03 21:45 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] torture: support randomized shuffling for proxy exec testing Connor O'Brien
2022-11-12 16:54   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-14 20:44     ` Connor O'Brien
2022-11-15 16:02       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-03 21:45 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] locktorture: support nested mutexes Connor O'Brien
2022-10-06  9:59 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Reviving the Proxy Execution Series Juri Lelli
2022-10-06 10:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 12:14     ` Juri Lelli
2022-10-15 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-17  2:23 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-19 11:43   ` Qais Yousef
2022-10-19 12:23     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-19 13:41       ` Juri Lelli
2022-10-19 13:51         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-19 19:30         ` Qais Yousef
2022-10-20  8:51           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-17  3:25 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-10-17  3:56   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-17  4:26     ` Chengming Zhou
2022-10-17 12:27       ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEXW_YRSj3T7MY1qu=hy7+Wf=p34bBKnCLfE7vMJUmFbg0wCKA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=connoro@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).