From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: raise RCU qs after each threaded NAPI poll
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:14:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YRfjhBjsMpBEdCoLd2S+=5YdFSs2AS07xwN72bgtW4sDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e592faa3-db99-4074-9492-3f9021b4350c@paulmck-laptop>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:18 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Yan Zhai wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:37 AM Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> > > Also optionally, I wonder if calling rcu_tasks_qs() directly is better
> > > (for documentation if anything) since the issue is Tasks RCU specific. Also
> > > code comment above the rcu_softirq_qs() call about cond_resched() not taking
> > > care of Tasks RCU would be great!
> > >
> > Yes it's quite surprising to me that cond_resched does not help here,
>
> In theory, it would be possible to make cond_resched() take care of
> Tasks RCU. In practice, the lazy-preemption work is looking to get rid
> of cond_resched(). But if for some reason cond_resched() needs to stay
> around, doing that work might make sense.
In my opinion, cond_resched() doing Tasks-RCU QS does not make sense
(to me), because cond_resched() is to inform the scheduler to run
something else possibly of higher priority while the current task is
still runnable. On the other hand, what's not permitted in a Tasks RCU
reader is a voluntary sleep. So IMO even though cond_resched() is a
voluntary call, it is still not a sleep but rather a preemption point.
So a Tasks RCU reader should perfectly be able to be scheduled out in
the middle of a read-side critical section (in current code) by
calling cond_resched(). It is just like involuntary preemption in the
middle of a RCU reader, in disguise, Right?
thanks,
- Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 15:44 [PATCH] net: raise RCU qs after each threaded NAPI poll Yan Zhai
2024-02-27 16:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-27 18:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-27 21:22 ` Yan Zhai
2024-02-27 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 3:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-28 4:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 14:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-28 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 15:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-28 15:57 ` Yan Zhai
2024-02-28 11:50 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-02-28 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 15:48 ` Yan Zhai
2024-02-28 17:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 15:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-28 16:37 ` Yan Zhai
2024-02-28 17:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 20:14 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2024-02-28 21:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 21:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-28 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 22:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-28 22:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-28 22:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-02-28 22:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-28 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-29 14:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-29 16:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-29 17:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-29 18:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-02 2:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-03-03 0:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-03 1:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-03-04 9:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-03-05 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-05 19:57 ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-05 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-06 16:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-07 16:57 ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-07 18:34 ` Mark Rutland
2024-03-07 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-07 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-03-04 9:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-02-28 22:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-27 21:17 ` Yan Zhai
2024-02-28 23:53 ` Yan Zhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEXW_YRfjhBjsMpBEdCoLd2S+=5YdFSs2AS07xwN72bgtW4sDQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).