linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, mips: Fix build errors about __NR_bpf undeclared
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:22:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYiEeSW=9dCnPdNhA4ORSFUL6y7ZVFOiHR5k9AcccFv+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ca847a8-78a5-6ad9-ab4b-62dcda33df7c@iogearbox.net>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:05 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>
> [ +Johan ]
>
> On 11/25/21 2:36 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > Add the __NR_bpf definitions to fix the following build errors for mips.
> >
> >   $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool
> >   $ make
> >   [...]
> >   bpf.c:54:4: error: #error __NR_bpf not defined. libbpf does not support your arch.
> >    #  error __NR_bpf not defined. libbpf does not support your arch.
> >       ^~~~~
> >   bpf.c: In function ‘sys_bpf’:
> >   bpf.c:66:17: error: ‘__NR_bpf’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘__NR_brk’?
> >     return syscall(__NR_bpf, cmd, attr, size);
> >                    ^~~~~~~~
> >                    __NR_brk
> >   [...]
> >   In file included from gen_loader.c:15:0:
> >   skel_internal.h: In function ‘skel_sys_bpf’:
> >   skel_internal.h:53:17: error: ‘__NR_bpf’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘__NR_brk’?
> >     return syscall(__NR_bpf, cmd, attr, size);
> >                    ^~~~~~~~
> >                    __NR_brk
> >
> > We can see the following generated definitions:
> >
> >   $ grep -r "#define __NR_bpf" arch/mips
> >   arch/mips/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_o32.h:#define __NR_bpf (__NR_Linux + 355)
> >   arch/mips/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_n64.h:#define __NR_bpf (__NR_Linux + 315)
> >   arch/mips/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_n32.h:#define __NR_bpf (__NR_Linux + 319)
> >
> > The __NR_Linux is defined in arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h:
> >
> >   $ grep -r "#define __NR_Linux" arch/mips
> >   arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h:#define __NR_Linux      4000
> >   arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h:#define __NR_Linux      5000
> >   arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h:#define __NR_Linux      6000
> >
> > That is to say, __NR_bpf is
> > 4000 + 355 = 4355 for mips o32,
> > 6000 + 319 = 6319 for mips n32,
> > 5000 + 315 = 5315 for mips n64.
> >
> > So use the GCC pre-defined macro _ABIO32, _ABIN32 and _ABI64 [1] to define
> > the corresponding __NR_bpf.
> >
> > This patch is similar with commit bad1926dd2f6 ("bpf, s390: fix build for
> > libbpf and selftest suite").
> >
> > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/config/mips/mips.h#l549
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> > ---
> >
> > v2: use a final number without __NR_Linux to define __NR_bpf
> >      suggested by Andrii Nakryiko, thank you.
> >
> >   tools/build/feature/test-bpf.c |  6 ++++++
> >   tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c            |  6 ++++++
> >   tools/lib/bpf/skel_internal.h  | 10 ++++++++++
> >   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/build/feature/test-bpf.c b/tools/build/feature/test-bpf.c
> > index 82070ea..727d22e 100644
> > --- a/tools/build/feature/test-bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/build/feature/test-bpf.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@
> >   #  define __NR_bpf 349
> >   # elif defined(__s390__)
> >   #  define __NR_bpf 351
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABIO32)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 4355
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABIN32)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 6319
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABI64)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 5315
> >   # else
> >   #  error __NR_bpf not defined. libbpf does not support your arch.
> >   # endif
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > index 94560ba..17f9fe2 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > @@ -50,6 +50,12 @@
> >   #  define __NR_bpf 351
> >   # elif defined(__arc__)
> >   #  define __NR_bpf 280
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABIO32)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 4355
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABIN32)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 6319
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABI64)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 5315
> >   # else
> >   #  error __NR_bpf not defined. libbpf does not support your arch.
> >   # endif
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/skel_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/skel_internal.h
> > index 9cf6670..064da66 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/skel_internal.h
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/skel_internal.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,16 @@
> >   #include <sys/syscall.h>
> >   #include <sys/mman.h>
> >
> > +#ifndef __NR_bpf
> > +# if defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABIO32)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 4355
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABIN32)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 6319
> > +# elif defined(__mips__) && defined(_ABI64)
> > +#  define __NR_bpf 5315
> > +# endif
> > +#endif
>
> Bit unfortunate that mips is the only arch where we run into this apparently? :/
> Given we also redefine a skel_sys_bpf(), maybe libbpf should just provide something
> like a `LIBBPF_API int libbpf_sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, [...])` so we rely implicitly
> only on the libbpf-internal __NR_bpf instead of duplicating again?

Unfortunately the point of skel_internal.h is to not depend on libbpf
APIs. I think for now it should be fine to have this duplication (not
that those numbers are going to change ever) and we can improve this
later.

>
> >   /* This file is a base header for auto-generated *.lskel.h files.
> >    * Its contents will change and may become part of auto-generation in the future.
> >    *
> >
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-26  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-25  1:36 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, mips: Fix build errors about __NR_bpf undeclared Tiezhu Yang
2021-11-25 23:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-11-26  1:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2021-11-26 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEf4BzYiEeSW=9dCnPdNhA4ORSFUL6y7ZVFOiHR5k9AcccFv+g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lixuefeng@loongson.cn \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).