From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org,
sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/15] libbpf: don't use cxx to test_libpf target
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:11:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZWPwzC8ZBWcBOfQQmxBkDRjogxw2xHZ+dMWOrrMmU0sg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121214225.GA3145429@mini-arch.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:42 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me> wrote:
>
> On 10/11, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> > No need to use C++ for test_libbpf target when libbpf is on C and it
> > can be tested with C, after this change the CXXFLAGS in makefiles can
> > be avoided, at least in bpf samples, when sysroot is used, passing
> > same C/LDFLAGS as for lib.
> >
> > Add "return 0" in test_libbpf to avoid warn, but also remove spaces at
> > start of the lines to keep same style and avoid warns while apply.
> Hey, just spotted this patch, not sure how it slipped through.
> The c++ test was there to make sure libbpf can be included and
> linked against c++ code (i.e. libbpf headers don't have some c++
> keywords/etc).
>
> Any particular reason you were not happy with it? Can we revert it
> back to c++ and fix your use-case instead? Alternatively, we can just
> remove this test if we don't really care about c++.
>
No one seemed to know why we have C++ pieces in pure C library and its
Makefile, so we decide to "fix" this. :)
But I do understand your concern. Would it be possible to instead do
this as a proper selftests test? Do you mind taking a look at that?
Thanks!
(please trim irrelevant parts)
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 0:27 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/15] samples: bpf: improve/fix cross-compilation Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 01/15] samples/bpf: fix HDR_PROBE "echo" Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 02/15] samples/bpf: fix cookie_uid_helper_example obj build Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/15] samples/bpf: use --target from cross-compile Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 04/15] samples/bpf: use own EXTRA_CFLAGS for clang commands Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 05/15] samples/bpf: use __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ selector for arm Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 8:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-11 9:56 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 06/15] samples/bpf: drop unnecessarily inclusion for bpf_load Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 07/15] samples/bpf: add makefile.target for separate CC target build Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 08/15] samples/bpf: base target programs rules on Makefile.target Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/15] samples/bpf: use own flags but not HOSTCFLAGS Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 8:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-11 9:57 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 11:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-12 21:26 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-13 17:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/15] samples/bpf: use target CC environment for HDR_PROBE Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 11/15] libbpf: don't use cxx to test_libpf target Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-11-21 21:42 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-11-22 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2019-11-22 16:32 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-11-22 23:47 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-11-23 0:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 12/15] libbpf: add C/LDFLAGS to libbpf.so and test_libpf targets Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-12 16:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 13/15] samples/bpf: provide C/LDFLAGS to libbpf Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 14/15] samples/bpf: add sysroot support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:28 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 15/15] samples/bpf: add preparation steps and sysroot info to readme Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/15] samples: bpf: improve/fix cross-compilation Ilias Apalodimas
2019-10-12 23:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEf4BzZWPwzC8ZBWcBOfQQmxBkDRjogxw2xHZ+dMWOrrMmU0sg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).