From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat()
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:20:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEg-Je8UCV6kFdXJoyH3B78sraYCXscTmQQiPHjkPvzt5g1Wpw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210415182909.GK4332@42.do-not-panic.com>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:29 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:17:58PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > There's a lot of larger things that need to
> > be addressed in general to support the volume approach inside file systems
> > that is going to require a lot of work inside of VFS. If you feel like
> > tackling that work and then wiring up btrfs by all means have at it, but I'm
> > not seeing a urgent need to address this. Thanks,
>
> That's precisely what I what I want to hear me about. Things like this.
> Would btrfs be the ony user of volumes inside filesystem? Jeff had
> mentioned before this could also allow namespaces per volumes, and this
> might be a desirable feature.
>
> What else?
Wouldn't this be useful for union filesystems like OverlayFS? Or other
filesystems that support nested filesystems like bcachefs?
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-15 2:58 [RFC v3 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat() Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-15 2:58 ` [RFC v3 1/2] fs/super.c: add new super block sub devices super_block_dev Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-15 2:58 ` [RFC v3 2/2] btrfs: use the new VFS super_block_dev Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-08-15 9:29 ` [RFC v3 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat() Al Viro
2014-08-17 23:41 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-23 22:31 ` Jeff Mahoney
2021-04-15 17:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-04-15 18:17 ` Josef Bacik
2021-04-15 18:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-04-16 17:20 ` Neal Gompa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEg-Je8UCV6kFdXJoyH3B78sraYCXscTmQQiPHjkPvzt5g1Wpw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ngompa13@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).