From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752003AbaJTRMT (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:12:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:65362 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750935AbaJTRMR (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:12:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140821071234.50348079@pifs> References: <1408566581-14109-1-git-send-email-jim.epost@gmail.com> <20140821071234.50348079@pifs> From: SeongJae Park Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:11:46 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove outdated references to the linux-next wiki To: Frank Seidel Cc: Jim Davis , Randy Dunlap , linux-doc , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Greg KH , Stephen Rothwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Frank Seidel wrote: > Am Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:09:53 -0700 Jim Davis > wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:05 PM, SeongJae Park >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Jim Davis >> > wrote: >> >> The linux-next wiki at http://linux.f-seidel.de/linux-next/pmwiki >> >> has been gone for several months now. >> > >> > Yes, I can't load the page, too. BTW, wouldn't it be better to add >> > Frank Seidel as recipient because he was the manager of the wiki? >> >> I did send an email query about the wiki status -- with a "thank you!" >> for the work involved -- a couple of days ago. Didn't bounce, but >> there's not been a response. >> >> That wiki was very helpful as I tried to get going with linux-next >> stuff. > > Sorry for my late response. Due to financial reasons i had to quit > the contract for the server hosting that site. > Just moved the domain now to another hoster, but didn't find time until > now to setup things there again. > But i definitly will be doing so (hopefully within the next one or two > weeks). Looks like the page is not recovered yet. If it needs far more times until recover, how about adding some note for the temporal site down or just removing the link until the page be recovered? Btw, I don't want to make pressure. If I am, so sorry. I Just want your opinion. Thanks, SeongJae Park > > Thanks, > Frank