From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D63C7618B for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733CB21842 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IVzn3FU5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726714AbfG2HUi (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 03:20:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:38565 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725917AbfG2HUh (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 03:20:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g17so60570356wrr.5; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:20:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NGAnXdnyTlrtK65biDfN+R0xcD/6ajBIRQzlf8iLxcA=; b=IVzn3FU5qq9wRwY7u5JJs1BkiXHdMdTrBdvwk8Jt4WShqOZBA47c3hzZDNZ3RYW4KW +IdO3+kqx0CQmXVR/5w//0hTu5ZLepZQk4+nIvMr70w/cMQ8Sc46OHlSGD4RQ4jGnhnJ 4AeA1gTdhfVop/9UZJHN0bAoo7Iv5ACel8XHK/J85Sd5PQCQfOSbBB3nYWHVhfj5myz0 f7xcEQ8Vn5CYlOh2UzkE/KszbJSLki6CA5Wz5JIhhZ6ZAqkNP7VhhzHwYuZmVlYtgpFq lqPe6Iwn9TMTSoXgRBoW7BbsEzBhvbZNdU670/nGINNOj0yJo2CH4aeeqm9LrD7aG38m lV8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NGAnXdnyTlrtK65biDfN+R0xcD/6ajBIRQzlf8iLxcA=; b=cWo8cs+B3MR6Z+hlot7LjHNpdmXhB2AZabB1G6uc8WXl3uAuV57dPZOm+HqYrZqf9d 19dA8bu6lKhSB56oUIiepSL4IsZcx2L5FcrHGma+pJvMIDJ1wfRgHejAbD2reRPkbyA/ 9mQm4JMBKFANUONfHF77EGf4pIwJfhfp+Tz+UoAm7rN2WkVtTJUWGgq7yCfXFGazuwlQ gSWYAs/0icqq0booVy8PyW0EbrVCv2YW1gdn53E0SOMEJn0Y2rUfViV8K5+dfJemwDUW jYcmZgcI64s5tZB4CvnZqAzXPk8O5oWzkApoNLMfDr5GsSP6ERC1kR+groOFwBL8GYUE ZS5w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWsfMouc7/N73mP3oWW9irNDxiCFDXb7S14s6QhaRgtlhRSbr4l SjUSFd5oaNY3Nb+RyC6haJGXUVLWMLdqI8VKCbQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtBXh9XypbQCggtX40yh034dlUxuLKuPCiBaZSuYbNdbqeWex1ATByZQcE6PXfNMdArNjf9paTKtKnFSuc4uI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:c70e:: with SMTP id k14mr15959399wrg.201.1564384835131; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:20:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190705045612.27665-1-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> <20190705045612.27665-5-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> <20190727161736.4dkfqgwftre67v56@fsr-ub1664-175> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Baluta Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:20:23 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] clk: imx8mq: Remove CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for IMX8MQ_CLK_TMU_ROOT To: Anson Huang Cc: Abel Vesa , "rui.zhang@intel.com" , "edubezval@gmail.com" , "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Lucas Stach , Andrey Smirnov , "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" , Carlo Caione , =?UTF-8?Q?Guido_G=C3=BCnther?= , Leonard Crestez , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Devicetree List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , dl-linux-imx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Your explanation makes a lot of sense. We will take care today of Abel's > > patch. > > What do you think about Fabio's patch? I also think this is a valid patch: > > > > Hmm, when did Fabio sent out this patch? I can NOT find it... > I also have a patch in this series (#4/6) doing same thing on July 5th... > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11032783/ He didn't send the patch yet. It was just a request for test here: http://code.bulix.org/pd88jp-812381 But, now I see is exactly like your patch here: