From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757215AbdDROFq (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:05:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:36244 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752892AbdDROFo (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:05:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41C8C518@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1488810076-3754-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> <1488810076-3754-18-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> <20170306213829.GB5305@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20170307115808.16f5235e@xeon-e3> <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41C8C518@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:05:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/29] drivers, pci: convert hv_pci_dev.refs from atomic_t to refcount_t To: "Reshetova, Elena" Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Bjorn Helgaas , Stephen Hemminger , Kees Cook , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Haiyang Zhang , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , Hans Liljestrand , David Windsor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > >> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600 >> Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others] >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: >> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be >> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as >> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental >> > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free >> > > situations. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova >> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand >> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> > > Signed-off-by: David Windsor >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger > > Getting back on this: could you take the patch via your tree or should I resubmit to some dedicated place with a new review-by added? Sorry, for some reason I had assumed this would all go as part of the larger series. I applied it to my pci/host-hv branch with Stephen's reviewed-by for v4.12. Thanks for the ping! Bjorn