linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/10] memory-hotplug: Remove "weak" from memory_block_size_bytes() declaration
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:38:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4fS1fdNvur13LZVYomWdmjZnYO49Gc9BJv_BRxAXX3GA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141015170644.4063.6843.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

[+cc Rashika, Nathan, Anton, Blanchard, Heiko, Yinghai, Martin,
linux-s390; sorry, I botched my "stg mail" so you weren't included the
first time.  s390 and x86 define their own memory_block_size_bytes()
and are at risk for this problem.]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> drivers/base/memory.c provides a default memory_block_size_bytes()
> definition explicitly marked "weak".  Several architectures provide their
> own definitions intended to override the default, but the "weak" attribute
> on the declaration applied to the arch definitions as well, so the linker
> chose one based on link order (see 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak
> annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node decl")).
>
> Remove the "weak" attribute from the declaration so we always prefer a
> non-weak definition over the weak one, independent of link order.
>
> Fixes: 41f107266b19 ("drivers: base: Add prototype declaration to the header file")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> CC: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
> CC: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
> CC: Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>
> CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/memory.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h
> index bb7384e3c3d8..8b8d8d12348e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct memory_block {
>  };
>
>  int arch_get_memory_phys_device(unsigned long start_pfn);
> -unsigned long __weak memory_block_size_bytes(void);
> +unsigned long memory_block_size_bytes(void);
>
>  /* These states are exposed to userspace as text strings in sysfs */
>  #define        MEM_ONLINE              (1<<0) /* exposed to userspace */
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-15 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-15 17:05 [PATCH v1 00/10] Remove weak function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] audit: Remove "weak" from audit_classify_compat_syscall() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:25   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 17:02     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-15 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] x86, intel-mid: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-17  0:42     ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2014-10-17  1:41       ` David Cohen
2014-10-20 16:15         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-20 17:55           ` David Cohen
2014-10-16  5:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] MIPS: CPC: Make mips_cpc_phys_base() static Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] MIPS: Remove "weak" from platform_maar_init() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:04     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] MIPS: MT: Move "weak" from vpe_run() declaration to definition Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:49     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] clocksource: Remove "weak" from clocksource_default_clock() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:36   ` John Stultz
2014-10-15 23:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16  7:22     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 13:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:45         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16  5:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] vmcore: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16  7:23       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 20:11       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] kgdb: Remove "weak" from kgdb_arch_pc() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:35   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:38     ` Vineet Gupta
2014-10-17  7:59       ` Vineet Gupta
2014-10-20 16:20         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16  0:07   ` Harvey Harrison
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] memory-hotplug: Remove "weak" from memory_block_size_bytes() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-10-16  7:23     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] uprobes: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16  5:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-16  5:57   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-10-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] Remove weak " Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAErSpo4fS1fdNvur13LZVYomWdmjZnYO49Gc9BJv_BRxAXX3GA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rashika.kheria@gmail.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).