From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BBDC2D0E4 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0582222B for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ljuzswvw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728411AbgKQMw5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:52:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55036 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728391AbgKQMw5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 07:52:57 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb42.google.com (mail-yb1-xb42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD496C0613CF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb42.google.com with SMTP id o71so18514648ybc.2; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:52:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=396qJVY6ErHdgJBEcIkB7PgsMbRLrKyXYL9zfaRd/qI=; b=ljuzswvwjOBJz6QVKdgFaDEJ//ZSe2x78P2n3bpFsDydu66PaCJZj9mm9rolc7GESg U+buqkde9mhtuDxCFvE0Z67DmE1W5N9rq2MY6RXx1Eds6Gl7Uw0MLBTFANRsv3e4UIKZ ijps7KojO+B+tR1aNLiSNZqGuB9Inswy0UqT2wpkXflfHi9bJG8Y6lKZFlsZ7SQhZ1fE EXbEgnG47XBehfKp06WLHyy0zj8hIAIGVpnGMWvPbqqPl9sFrknerdiovMTrNdOxdLMy RuARZhOcBwEL4che7mJupjD4aiGosuU6TslLUbliUHKSNKOOnSUyeVWuZDZIAV+khh4s 11vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=396qJVY6ErHdgJBEcIkB7PgsMbRLrKyXYL9zfaRd/qI=; b=VfRYeaJbhyvC7WJdFYUiagTAiwtc7nJi5Gv1D7T2pExV38UKEzpe83R6vUqyH9PDma kp18Kl/TiTJ5vtltZWNMzGx1QZu0XGcEWYXOSxzgELOZ9dYi/zYLMPNf+fYJYK1ayKJa qjZCKdsuY8wHvwhXvOKMr/euG5/wwBRNBIRkKjUIMm8tOncX3obSSNHySOj/0zaq5oRW NBpnG7uiixGX0OEOGrrA3BsMDT0w5ZgqBcczQrr8SesYJI+MzNcXnQOedeq26xMAj2IY tM//a++0nFJ51DIYClVxlrs0vQ9ZLimUcKgerUBiVeEJocq4xuXOfk53ZmYKdGEJdeYe k1Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319zPbVib355uEIDHCjpm5HT5CuyrUKUzFO+WYC72oJnqLrxMTx l1RqQzIidPng69UFiLWrRgnwRyA+eLb1NBuqja0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+tdbnrh5Atxyg1T06ymJ1SZqSL1AyP5t5SJlfh8h5YbXSVsku5ZXdl158y5y1HDHNNXjPCviqAeJeZk41j5A= X-Received: by 2002:a25:2d55:: with SMTP id s21mr23025144ybe.389.1605617576209; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:52:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201117011611epcms2p22fb0315814144e94856a96014c376a04@epcms2p2> <20201117074207.GC3436@kozik-lap> In-Reply-To: From: Bongsu Jeon Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:52:45 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Bongsu Jeon , Krzysztof Opasiak , "linux-nfc@lists.01.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:39 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:14, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > > > 2020-11-17 16:42 GMT+09:00, krzk@kernel.org : > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > >> max_payload is unused. > > > > > > Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you > > > with a tag, so you should include it. > > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > Sorry about that. I included the tag. > > You need to reduce the rate of sending new patches. You sent v1. Then > you sent again v1, which I reviewed. Then you send v2 without my > review. So I provided a review. Then you sent again a v2 with my > reviewed tags. So there are two v1 patches and two v2. Since I > provided you the review tags for v2, no need to send v2 again. It > confuses. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Sorry to confuse you. I made a mistake because I thought that you asked me to resend the patches with the new version(v2). I think you intended that I need to version the patches and describe changes when I update the patches next time. Thanks a lot for reviewing my patches.