linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cixi Geng <gengcixi@gmail.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: "Orson Zhai" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	"Chunyan Zhang" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
	jic23@kernel.org, "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"朱玉明 (Yuming Zhu/11457)" <yuming.zhu1@unisoc.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	"Devicetree List" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: structure adjuststment and optimization
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:53:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF12kFu6O-gfiqp4j24zxC_GqCwJ2Q5KGYYaCtnagmUFB_bsVg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADBw62pBCdrbRspTV9Yck4DP8DE=ECGmEtD74NOtm1YRT3DM8w@mail.gmail.com>

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com> 于2022年1月7日周五 15:03写道:
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:00 PM Cixi Geng <gengcixi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@unisoc.com>
> >
> > Introduce one variant device data structure to be compatible
> > with SC2731 PMIC since it has different scale and ratio calculation
> > and so on.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuming Zhu <yuming.zhu1@unisoc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@unisoc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > index aee076c8e2b1..d2712e54ee79 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> >  /* PMIC global registers definition */
> > -#define SC27XX_MODULE_EN               0xc08
> > +#define SC2731_MODULE_EN               0xc08
> >  #define SC27XX_MODULE_ADC_EN           BIT(5)
> > -#define SC27XX_ARM_CLK_EN              0xc10
> > +#define SC2731_ARM_CLK_EN              0xc10
> >  #define SC27XX_CLK_ADC_EN              BIT(5)
> >  #define SC27XX_CLK_ADC_CLK_EN          BIT(6)
> >
> > @@ -78,6 +78,23 @@ struct sc27xx_adc_data {
> >         int channel_scale[SC27XX_ADC_CHANNEL_MAX];
> >         u32 base;
> >         int irq;
> > +       const struct sc27xx_adc_variant_data *var_data;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Since different PMICs of SC27xx series can have different
> > + * address and ratio, we should save ratio config and base
> > + * in the device data structure.
> > + */
> > +struct sc27xx_adc_variant_data {
> > +       u32 module_en;
> > +       u32 clk_en;
> > +       u32 scale_shift;
> > +       u32 scale_mask;
> > +       const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *bscale_cal;
> > +       const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *sscale_cal;
> > +       void (*init_scale)(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data);
> > +       int (*get_ratio)(int channel, int scale);
> >  };
> >
> >  struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph {
> > @@ -103,6 +120,16 @@ static struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph small_scale_graph = {
> >         100, 341,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph sc2731_big_scale_graph_calib = {
> > +       4200, 850,
> > +       3600, 728,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph sc2731_small_scale_graph_calib = {
> > +       1000, 838,
> > +       100, 84,
> > +};
>
> The original big_scale_graph_calib and small_scale_graph_calib are for
> SC2731 PMIC, why add new structure definition for SC2731?
>
> > +
> >  static const struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph big_scale_graph_calib = {
> >         4200, 856,
> >         3600, 733,
> > @@ -130,11 +157,11 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_scale_calibration(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> >         size_t len;
> >
> >         if (big_scale) {
> > -               calib_graph = &big_scale_graph_calib;
> > +               calib_graph = data->var_data->bscale_cal;
> >                 graph = &big_scale_graph;
> >                 cell_name = "big_scale_calib";
> >         } else {
> > -               calib_graph = &small_scale_graph_calib;
> > +               calib_graph = data->var_data->sscale_cal;
> >                 graph = &small_scale_graph;
> >                 cell_name = "small_scale_calib";
> >         }
> > @@ -160,7 +187,7 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_scale_calibration(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int sc27xx_adc_get_ratio(int channel, int scale)
> > +static int sc2731_adc_get_ratio(int channel, int scale)
> >  {
> >         switch (channel) {
> >         case 1:
> > @@ -185,6 +212,21 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_get_ratio(int channel, int scale)
> >         return SC27XX_VOLT_RATIO(1, 1);
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * According to the datasheet set specific value on some channel.
> > + */
> > +static void sc2731_adc_scale_init(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data)
> > +{
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < SC27XX_ADC_CHANNEL_MAX; i++) {
> > +               if (i == 5)
> > +                       data->channel_scale[i] = 1;
> > +               else
> > +                       data->channel_scale[i] = 0;
> > +       }
> > +}
>
> This is unnecessary I think, please see sc27xx_adc_write_raw() that
> can set the channel scale.
Did you mean that all the PMIC's scale_init function should put into
the sc27xx_adc_write_raw?
but the scale_init is all different by each PMIC, if implemented in
the write_raw, will add a lot of
if or switch_case branch
>
> > +
> >  static int sc27xx_adc_read(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, int channel,
> >                            int scale, int *val)
> >  {
> > @@ -208,10 +250,11 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_read(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, int channel,
> >                 goto disable_adc;
> >
> >         /* Configure the channel id and scale */
> > -       tmp = (scale << SC27XX_ADC_SCALE_SHIFT) & SC27XX_ADC_SCALE_MASK;
> > +       tmp = (scale << data->var_data->scale_shift) & data->var_data->scale_mask;
> >         tmp |= channel & SC27XX_ADC_CHN_ID_MASK;
> >         ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->base + SC27XX_ADC_CH_CFG,
> > -                                SC27XX_ADC_CHN_ID_MASK | SC27XX_ADC_SCALE_MASK,
> > +                                SC27XX_ADC_CHN_ID_MASK |
> > +                                data->var_data->scale_mask,
> >                                  tmp);
> >         if (ret)
> >                 goto disable_adc;
> > @@ -262,8 +305,9 @@ static void sc27xx_adc_volt_ratio(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> >                                   int channel, int scale,
> >                                   u32 *div_numerator, u32 *div_denominator)
> >  {
> > -       u32 ratio = sc27xx_adc_get_ratio(channel, scale);
> > +       u32 ratio;
> >
> > +       ratio = data->var_data->get_ratio(channel, scale);
> >         *div_numerator = ratio >> SC27XX_RATIO_NUMERATOR_OFFSET;
> >         *div_denominator = ratio & SC27XX_RATIO_DENOMINATOR_MASK;
> >  }
> > @@ -432,13 +476,13 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_enable(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data)
> >  {
> >         int ret;
> >
> > -       ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SC27XX_MODULE_EN,
> > +       ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->var_data->module_en,
> >                                  SC27XX_MODULE_ADC_EN, SC27XX_MODULE_ADC_EN);
> >         if (ret)
> >                 return ret;
> >
> >         /* Enable ADC work clock and controller clock */
> > -       ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SC27XX_ARM_CLK_EN,
> > +       ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->var_data->clk_en,
> >                                  SC27XX_CLK_ADC_EN | SC27XX_CLK_ADC_CLK_EN,
> >                                  SC27XX_CLK_ADC_EN | SC27XX_CLK_ADC_CLK_EN);
> >         if (ret)
> > @@ -456,10 +500,10 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_enable(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data)
> >         return 0;
> >
> >  disable_clk:
> > -       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SC27XX_ARM_CLK_EN,
> > +       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->var_data->clk_en,
> >                            SC27XX_CLK_ADC_EN | SC27XX_CLK_ADC_CLK_EN, 0);
> >  disable_adc:
> > -       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SC27XX_MODULE_EN,
> > +       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->var_data->module_en,
> >                            SC27XX_MODULE_ADC_EN, 0);
> >
> >         return ret;
> > @@ -470,21 +514,39 @@ static void sc27xx_adc_disable(void *_data)
> >         struct sc27xx_adc_data *data = _data;
> >
> >         /* Disable ADC work clock and controller clock */
> > -       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SC27XX_ARM_CLK_EN,
> > +       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->var_data->clk_en,
> >                            SC27XX_CLK_ADC_EN | SC27XX_CLK_ADC_CLK_EN, 0);
> >
> > -       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SC27XX_MODULE_EN,
> > +       regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, data->var_data->module_en,
> >                            SC27XX_MODULE_ADC_EN, 0);
> >  }
> >
> > +static const struct sc27xx_adc_variant_data sc2731_data = {
> > +       .module_en = SC2731_MODULE_EN,
> > +       .clk_en = SC2731_ARM_CLK_EN,
> > +       .scale_shift = SC27XX_ADC_SCALE_SHIFT,
> > +       .scale_mask = SC27XX_ADC_SCALE_MASK,
> > +       .bscale_cal = &sc2731_big_scale_graph_calib,
> > +       .sscale_cal = &sc2731_small_scale_graph_calib,
> > +       .init_scale = sc2731_adc_scale_init,
> > +       .get_ratio = sc2731_adc_get_ratio,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int sc27xx_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >         struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> >         struct sc27xx_adc_data *sc27xx_data;
> > +       const struct sc27xx_adc_variant_data *pdata;
> >         struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> >         int ret;
> >
> > +       pdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +       if (!pdata) {
> > +               dev_err(dev, "No matching driver data found\n");
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*sc27xx_data));
> >         if (!indio_dev)
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -520,6 +582,8 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >         }
> >
> >         sc27xx_data->dev = dev;
> > +       sc27xx_data->var_data = pdata;
> > +       sc27xx_data->var_data->init_scale(sc27xx_data);
> >
> >         ret = sc27xx_adc_enable(sc27xx_data);
> >         if (ret) {
> > @@ -546,7 +610,7 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  }
> >
> >  static const struct of_device_id sc27xx_adc_of_match[] = {
> > -       { .compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc", },
> > +       { .compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc", .data = &sc2731_data},
> >         { }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sc27xx_adc_of_match);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Baolin Wang

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-06 12:59 [PATCH 0/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: adjust structure and add PMIC's support Cixi Geng
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings:iio:adc: add sprd,ump9620-adc dtbindings Cixi Geng
2022-01-06 17:39   ` Rob Herring
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: fix read big scale voltage not right Cixi Geng
2022-01-07  6:55   ` Baolin Wang
2022-01-09 16:06     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: structure adjuststment and optimization Cixi Geng
2022-01-07  7:04   ` Baolin Wang
2022-01-13  1:53     ` Cixi Geng [this message]
2022-01-17  6:16       ` Baolin Wang
2022-01-24  8:06         ` Cixi Geng
2022-02-10  8:08           ` Baolin Wang
2022-02-23 12:46             ` Cixi Geng
2022-02-25 10:19               ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-01  6:27                 ` Cixi Geng
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 4/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: add support for PMIC sc2720 and sc2721 Cixi Geng
2022-01-07  7:16   ` Baolin Wang
2022-01-09 16:13     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: add support for PMIC sc2730 Cixi Geng
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 6/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: add support for PMIC ump9620 Cixi Geng
2022-01-07  7:23   ` Baolin Wang
2022-01-06 12:59 ` [PATCH 7/7] iio: adc: sc27xx: add Ump9620 ADC suspend and resume pm support Cixi Geng
2022-01-07  7:34   ` Baolin Wang
2022-01-09 16:22     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAF12kFu6O-gfiqp4j24zxC_GqCwJ2Q5KGYYaCtnagmUFB_bsVg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gengcixi@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuming.zhu1@unisoc.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).