From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753926AbbHMRgU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:36:20 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:53340 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752767AbbHMRgR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:36:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55CCCEC1.7090809@kernel.dk>
References: <1439363241-31772-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
	<55CCCB2A.9020203@kernel.dk>
	<1439485401.19144.19.camel@ssi>
	<55CCCEC1.7090809@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:36:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF1ivSbuGcRt+NkEv0KFw8Bjw+jp4aC88wWZ4WZdW45mhiuBoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs
From: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
        Dongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 11:07 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 11:03 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 10:51 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 08/12/2015 01:07 AM, Ming Lin wrote:
> >>> Hi Jens,
> >>>
> >>> Neil/Mike/Martin have acked/reviewed PATCH 1.
> >>> Now it's ready. Could you please apply this series?
> >>>
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mlin/linux.git/log/?h=block-generic-req
> >>>
> >>> Please note that, for discard, we cap the size at 2G.
> >>> We'll change it to UINT_MAX after the splitting code in
> >>> DM thinp is rewritten.
> >>>
> >>> v6:
> >>>     - rebase on top of 4.2-rc6+
> >>>     - fix discard/write_same 32bit bi_size overflow issue
> >>>     - add ACKs/Review from Mike/Christoph/Martin/Steven
> >>
> >> Why did you rebase it on top of 4.2-rc6+? If you had kept it at 4.2-rc1,
> >> it would have applied to for-4.3/core a lot more easily. Care to respin
> >> on top of that?
> >
> > Because commit bd4aaf8 "dm: fix dm_merge_bvec regression on 32 bit
> > systems" in 4.2-rc6 conflicted with PATCH 6.
> >
> > Sure, I can respin on top of 4.2-rc1.
> >
> > Should I re-post new series to mail list or just update my tree?
>
> Just repost to me, if you don't want to spam the list again.

Already reposted to you off list.

Thanks.