From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD03C432BE for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F416108C for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234622AbhHLRIR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:08:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231392AbhHLRIL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:08:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B540C061756; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id f12-20020a05600c4e8c00b002e6bdd6ffe2so1851903wmq.5; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:07:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HFRt0wziwCpQcCnxa537F+IhhJf27Jkl+Fr+dlW4BP0=; b=YsAymJhgfctdXRrVg5tCsE+2YeenjK9nfl4ERVAjKtDmFCPeCKagM97Ff4NpvIUByR 61XBCorWB5JK9Rl0XgUcQavCgtbf5fFnNoYQP0diFgFVtYbQYjp3GDmqXR4fut+2taF9 NJrA6Sa/owdJ6iIuPHloHY1WBSVi34aa7Ia/djsgw8Yi2x9SEG/r9sXrfqbPpJzub0eu 3WysqIm1j2HeaZ4S9VeuI0mTWJLcoDiv1+nrvZ/OadgYHUaj4/zjaUCAhGZlsYsoYzz7 +QYINKKPBFa2qcjMcYEhlIS65FDrJ7eCkRGZt8Po5onm9MsFOWC6K1TLsXL5kQXO45Iv E0xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HFRt0wziwCpQcCnxa537F+IhhJf27Jkl+Fr+dlW4BP0=; b=LHqH/59QTwvNiiK1eANWPlE+i90VB46HJ6vWaeDqZIi8eWS4sJEG2YmlxdfshWgtbs X21DHNgJBGwSa6TPk27pD/4y9sTj3uZfq36SGOvdmYqcjBYjsSQeEgg2QRA5fZK28/MB q7jeR1tSfwDQe+sQc2dxpJjSo9Q/FGl7NOF1ukHljrVClFk3qt59i4YW46wsH16DcBqf 5aQ7SYrYuoY+P4fy8c4Onxo820fNWBzxgl9f6POhSXyaBmkMb8kR3Jlv56WrU4Kiuvmj h1PkvVTWGrrblZ4wsams6/vy0QecEScLwfzrG7snLgMjUOKOQY7g60fARs8BFnVdKNH5 M5dA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338Q6b2YsuHHWihLJU0pls5V53+ceVUUyODGYUwJ0m7ey2Bhg9c sufOoj6KfWQagqb5ZEG9DWEEutzvzi5Fcg6mH9o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyvzqMX+VE9EN3SxNGu4zLM6L6KBs2315nlwOIz/s+gUJnha7d6qfPVv7ZNVJFR06ap6Ku+MhKhxa66YJOyO0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c5:: with SMTP id u5mr2296366wmm.49.1628788064120; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:07:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210811235253.924867-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20210811235253.924867-2-robdclark@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rob Clark Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:11:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Avoid creating multiple connectors To: Doug Anderson Cc: dri-devel , linux-arm-msm , freedreno , Laurent Pinchart , Stephen Boyd , Rob Clark , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Jagan Teki , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 9:55 AM Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rob Clark wrote: > > > > From: Rob Clark > > > > If we created our own connector because the driver does not support the > > NO_CONNECTOR flag, we don't want the downstream bridge to *also* create > > a connector. And if this driver did pass the NO_CONNECTOR flag (and we > > supported that mode) this would change nothing. > > > > Fixes: 4e5763f03e10 ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Wrap panel with panel-bridge") > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson > > I'm going to apply this one to drm-misc/drm-misc-next and push since > it's a fix and we're before -rc6, then I'll take a look at the later > patches in the series. > Thanks.. this is the only one with some urgency, the rest can wait until next cycle. (And the bridge vs msm patches can land independently, I've tested the different possible combinations) BR, -R