From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
Hai Li <hali@codeaurora.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
rupran@einserver.de, stefan.hengelein@fau.de
Subject: Re: drm/msm/mdp5: undefined CONFIG_MSM_BUS_SCALING
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:54:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGtUVPAwxXxQ-XAFrMp=HpwVPkyVgCGQgHW6Q_6jKH8tdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428603178.13881.20.camel@x220>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 19:07 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> I really don't understand. Why is this code in the kernel tree if it
>> can't be built? How does anyone use this? By taking it and copying it
>> where? If it can't be built, and no one can update it, and of course
>> not run it, why is it here? What good is this code doing sitting here?
>
> The Erlangen bot (courtesy of Valentin, Stefan, and Andreas) has taken
> over what I've been doing for quite some time, but doing it much more
> thoroughly. And my experience tells me that the reports they'll send in
> will trigger more discussions like this one.
>
> A lesson I learned from my daily checks for Kconfig oddities is that
> people go to great lengths defending unbuildable code. (Do a web search
> for ATHEROS_AR231X to find a discussion that dragged on for over three
> years!) Personally I stopped caring after someone insisted on having a
> file in the tree that was in no way connected to the build system: not a
> single line in any of the Makefiles pointed at it. So, as far as I'm
> concerned, if people can't point at a patch pending, somehow, somewhere,
> that would make their code buildable one might as well delete the code.
>
> I really think it's as simple as that.
>
In the example you reference, sure it is as simple as that. But here
we are not talking about files that aren't even referenced by build
system. We are talking about a driver which does build and run on
upstream kernel, and which has a few small #ifdef blocks to simplify
backporting to downstream kernels (which we still do need to use for
some generations and some devices)
Sure, I'd love never to have to deal with a downstream kernel. But
really.. I didn't create the downstream mess in the arm/android
ecosystem, I'm just trying to cope with it as best as possible.. don't
hate the player, hate the game :-P
BR,
-R
>
> Paul Bolle
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-09 11:22 drm/msm/mdp5: undefined CONFIG_MSM_BUS_SCALING Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-09 13:49 ` Rob Clark
2015-04-09 14:20 ` Greg KH
2015-04-09 14:50 ` Rob Clark
2015-04-09 17:07 ` Greg KH
2015-04-09 18:02 ` Rob Clark
2015-04-09 18:12 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-09 18:54 ` Rob Clark [this message]
2015-04-09 19:38 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-09 19:44 ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-09 20:20 ` Rob Clark
2015-04-10 6:04 ` Valentin Rothberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAF6AEGtUVPAwxXxQ-XAFrMp=HpwVPkyVgCGQgHW6Q_6jKH8tdg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hali@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=rupran@einserver.de \
--cc=stefan.hengelein@fau.de \
--cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).