linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	elder@kernel.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, cpratapa@codeaurora.org,
	Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: ipa: don't disable NAPI in suspend
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:25:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-L1SKzu+gsma7KN4VjGnma-_w+amXx=Y_0e78rQiUCu7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210129202019.2099259-10-elder@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:29 PM Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The channel stop and suspend paths both call __gsi_channel_stop(),
> which quiesces channel activity, disables NAPI, and (on other than
> SDM845) stops the channel.  Similarly, the start and resume paths
> share __gsi_channel_start(), which starts the channel and re-enables
> NAPI again.
>
> Disabling NAPI should be done when stopping a channel, but this
> should *not* be done when suspending.  It's not necessary in the
> suspend path anyway, because the stopped channel (or suspended
> endpoint on SDM845) will not cause interrupts to schedule NAPI,
> and gsi_channel_trans_quiesce() won't return until there are no
> more transactions to process in the NAPI polling loop.

But why is it incorrect to do so?

From a quick look, virtio-net disables on both remove and freeze, for instance.

> Instead, enable NAPI in gsi_channel_start(), when the completion
> interrupt is first enabled.  Disable it again in gsi_channel_stop(),
> when finally disabling the interrupt.
>
> Add a call to napi_synchronize() to __gsi_channel_stop(), to ensure
> NAPI polling is done before moving on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> ---
=
> @@ -894,12 +894,16 @@ int gsi_channel_start(struct gsi *gsi, u32 channel_id)
>         struct gsi_channel *channel = &gsi->channel[channel_id];
>         int ret;
>
> -       /* Enable the completion interrupt */
> +       /* Enable NAPI and the completion interrupt */
> +       napi_enable(&channel->napi);
>         gsi_irq_ieob_enable_one(gsi, channel->evt_ring_id);
>
>         ret = __gsi_channel_start(channel, true);
> -       if (ret)
> -               gsi_irq_ieob_disable_one(gsi, channel->evt_ring_id);
> +       if (!ret)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       gsi_irq_ieob_disable_one(gsi, channel->evt_ring_id);
> +       napi_disable(&channel->napi);
>
>         return ret;
>  }

subjective, but easier to parse when the normal control flow is linear
and the error path takes a branch (or goto, if reused).

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-30 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-29 20:20 [PATCH net-next 0/9] net: ipa: don't disable NAPI in suspend Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] net: ipa: don't thaw channel if error starting Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: ipa: introduce gsi_channel_stop_retry() Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] net: ipa: introduce __gsi_channel_start() Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: ipa: kill gsi_channel_freeze() and gsi_channel_thaw() Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: ipa: disable IEOB interrupt after channel stop Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: ipa: move completion interrupt enable/disable Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: ipa: don't disable IEOB interrupt during suspend Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: ipa: expand last transaction check Alex Elder
2021-01-29 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: ipa: don't disable NAPI in suspend Alex Elder
2021-01-30 15:25   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2021-01-30 19:22     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-31  4:30       ` Alex Elder
2021-01-31  4:29     ` Alex Elder
2021-01-31 14:52       ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-01-31 15:32         ` Alex Elder
2021-02-01  1:36           ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-02-01 14:35             ` Alex Elder
2021-02-01 14:47               ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-02-01 15:48                 ` Alex Elder
2021-02-01 18:38                 ` Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAF=yD-L1SKzu+gsma7KN4VjGnma-_w+amXx=Y_0e78rQiUCu7Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cpratapa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).