From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE5CC433E0 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F55664F45 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230361AbhCRMP5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:15:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53706 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229745AbhCRMPe (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:15:34 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D8DC06174A for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id z25so7188557lja.3 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:15:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Omp7PwWz4ZsnJGI0VayNjvXuWI6KCYnYna3gK48VOEI=; b=cPZ6Oq03T8DupUvI5LdJmafI7po/IOUvEu3R54j9cIvjSuwnioYo8aMw+qcxTByGz6 G5VL71L1ob3QI8X6BTCJVSa2ZZB8PXofVkjXwfFFfSph7dgxPttxA1pDNi/mZ8uWLJfp r+shIZ7sWMxRlb/RK/8MdI66VT7Asei+d1AWNaFOx5UEciCWmeJcBNzceha7mXBeLGZ9 meYPbQoHMVcVgtBk/s7VjMcvvnWNwd/+CBUvn/tXpMQ1wQa8vHm41QXSZp1ZckAdgcg7 +hE9XY5VOz1OwAVgQ7+bDFRpANKJQ1ct2UNtnHXe0qUf3RdFawXc2LZIP788vYgCjp/o RdIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Omp7PwWz4ZsnJGI0VayNjvXuWI6KCYnYna3gK48VOEI=; b=LVVEDFrr7QANerwlv6jDvSosfbASh1+MeTihDFBWA95UgXO/m3b9UPyeLW7ZYrLO1o ixLsEzW/wpHlNXLdL/9nh6aequDIsIeiaWGUzvoyGlwXBOTIVspAISLfZCctzuX69c4k UmxZeNLvVZa5GZt0y/Ub9u40Qx97RaPHmx15UhyOCnkOZLx2sgn/gpwRchn7mbjpSpMc Kmy+T+vcxu/yOu+Xcs7r9CjG6Bi2h5l2qdPea7aR2w7Y2xJi9xftSgKTY2uGZVb/RLwZ WOvXuiI4fHh4kdiFDEuwNiizb+OilgcYO8PPcKEuucvHMZXH0nbS5EVGRROTiXrezWuM pbdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iPp3Q5RhqS2GIiH0YVFBRw2fiWnL7+y2xuavZKZq2WSos0O/S vhH7VNjHNhutg/3Q0DXzALOCnFwWUATW78gbgb+C+A0jWBxVjg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+D73A6ED0lKJT1NKbl6EursFKTIQG4TfUq2xoTzNQxieOxJIBqrA7M5rYKHNElbeos1zxIGjguAezDZrJWsk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9791:: with SMTP id y17mr4970412lji.343.1616069732469; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:15:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210318113156.407406787@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20210318113156.407406787@infradead.org> From: Sumit Garg Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:45:21 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf , jbaron@akamai.com, Steven Rostedt , Ard Biesheuvel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kernel test robot , Jarkko Sakkinen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 17:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Hi, > > After more poking a new set of patches to fix static_call() vs __exit > functions. These patches replace the patch I posted yesterday: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YFH6BR61b5GK8ITo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net > > Since I've reproduced the problem locally, and these patches do seem to fully > cure things, I'll shortly queue them for tip/locking/urgent. > Thanks Peter for these fixes, works fine for me. FWIW: Tested-by: Sumit Garg -Sumit