Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Add LED triggers for HCI frames tx and rx

From: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Xu Wei <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Add LED triggers for HCI frames tx and rx
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:08:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFGCpxzYLgJu6NWOHHTAQRmPEA5xz3GUpO4Ru1dKgRdMxyCU1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D2545F6D-7100-4B59-A19D-7CF878902BAA@holtmann.org>

On 13 July 2016 at 16:07, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Guodong,
>
>> Two LED triggers are defined: tx_led and rx_led. Upon frames
>> available in HCI core layer, for tx or for rx, the combined LED
>> can blink.
>>
>> Verified on HiKey, 96boards. It uses hi6220 SoC and TI WL1835 combo
>> chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |  1 +
>> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c         |  3 +++
>> net/bluetooth/leds.c             | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> net/bluetooth/leds.h             |  2 ++
>> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>> index dc71473..37b8dd9 100644
>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>> @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ struct hci_dev {
>>       bdaddr_t                rpa;
>>
>>       struct led_trigger      *power_led;
>> +     struct led_trigger      *tx_led, *rx_led;
>>
>>       int (*open)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
>>       int (*close)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
>> index 45a9fc6..c6e1210 100644
>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
>> @@ -3248,6 +3248,7 @@ int hci_recv_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>       skb_queue_tail(&hdev->rx_q, skb);
>>       queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &hdev->rx_work);
>>
>> +     hci_leds_blink_oneshot(hdev->rx_led);
>>       return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(hci_recv_frame);
>> @@ -3325,6 +3326,8 @@ static void hci_send_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>               BT_ERR("%s sending frame failed (%d)", hdev->name, err);
>>               kfree_skb(skb);
>>       }
>> +
>> +     hci_leds_blink_oneshot(hdev->tx_led);
>> }
>
> so I am not convinced that this is the right way of doing TX/RX activity leds. This would have them purely based on HCI traffic and this would include control frames. I think that we want activity leds for actual radio activity. Meaning that when we have an active connection and ACL packets are exchanged or when we are scanning.
>

Thanks. I got your point. I will revise the code and submit again.

> Regards
>
> Marcel
>