From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754970AbaEOS0B (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 14:26:01 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]:38511 "EHLO mail-vc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754014AbaEOSZ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 14:25:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140515140856.GA17453@kroah.com> References: <1400103299-144589-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <20140515013245.GA1764@kroah.com> <1400120251.7699.11.camel@canyon.ip6.wittsend.com> <20140515031527.GA146352@ubuntu-hedt> <20140515040032.GA6702@kroah.com> <1400161337.7699.33.camel@canyon.ip6.wittsend.com> <20140515140856.GA17453@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:25:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Add support for devtmpfs in user namespaces From: Richard Weinberger To: LXC development mailing-list Cc: "Michael H. Warfield" , Jens Axboe , Serge Hallyn , Arnd Bergmann , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Then don't use a container to build such a thing, or fix the build > scripts to not do that :) I second this. To me it looks like some folks try to (ab)use Linux containers for purposes where KVM would much better fit in. Please don't put more complexity into containers. They are already horrible complex and error prone. -- Thanks, //richard