From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753827AbbDHMTG (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 08:19:06 -0400 Received: from mail-vn0-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:43005 "EHLO mail-vn0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751572AbbDHMTD (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 08:19:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1428388995.3152.10.camel@gmail.com> <1428401356.3152.38.camel@gmail.com> <55241C51.8040107@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:19:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why not build kernel with -O3 From: Richard Weinberger To: Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@gmail.com> Cc: Austin S Hemmelgarn , Mike Galbraith , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@gmail.com> wrote: > Could you please provide some examples that I can investigate? > Thanks! It would be awesome if you could find out which gcc optimizations cause the speed up. "gcc -c -Q -O3 --help=optimizers" will help you. Please also double check your results. You need do to multiple runs, etc... Especially the redis speed up looks odd. Does redis really spend that much time in the kernel? -- Thanks, //richard