linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkjerry.chu@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Bergmann <alex@linlab.net>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:29:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFbMe2N-Ag_tUnHCr1=cJJmC4FTfXVJumn2Bk-oVfxuBoSCGrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345629806.5158.933.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 11:29 +0200, Alex Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> > Actual 6 SYN frames are sent. The initial one and 5 retries.
>> >
>>
>> first one had a t0 + 0 delay. How can it count ???
>>
>> > The kernel is waiting another 32 seconds for a SYN+ACK and then gives
>> > the ETIMEDOUT back to userspace.
>> >
>> > Do you mean that we have to send another SYN packet after the 3 minutes?
>> >
>>
>> First SYN is not a retransmit
>>
>> R2 = time_of_last_SYN - time_of_initial_SYN (t0) = 31
>>
>> If you read RFC it states :
>>
>> "In particular, R2 for a SYN segment MUST
>>  be set large enough to provide retransmission of the segment
>>  for at least 3 minutes."
>>
>>
>> That means that the last _retransmit_ MUST happen after 180 seconds.
>>
>> And not :
>>
>> Send all the restransmits at t0 + 1, then wait 180 seconds before giving
>> connect() a timeout indication.
>>
>>
>
> Therefore, the minimal connect() timeout should be : 180 + 100 seconds
>
> (allowing 100 seconds for the SYNACKs sent in answer of the very last
> retransmit to come back)
>
> (100 seconds is the R2 for non SYN frames)
>
> RFC quote : The value of R2 SHOULD
>             correspond to at least 100 seconds.

I agree if you take RFC1122 literally the last retransmission must
happen no less than 3 minutes from the 1st SYN... Oh actually it'd be
3 minutes plus initRTO because the 3 minutes applies only to
"retransmission" as in

"R2 for a SYN segment MUST be set large enough to provide retransmission
of the segment for at least 3 minutes.:

But IMHO 6 retries providing 1+2+4+8+16+32 = 63 secs retransmission plus
64 secs wait time totaling 127 secs is really plenty enough.

You have a good point on SYN-ACK.

Jerry

>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-22 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-21 23:29 [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments Alex Bergmann
2012-08-22  8:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22  8:48   ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-22  8:58     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22  9:29       ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-22  9:59         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 10:03           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 17:29             ` H.K. Jerry Chu [this message]
2012-08-22 16:44 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
     [not found] ` <CAFbMe2M7ekc94bQk7vTS1LhScPd49VZ-zKOCUXhqwxXtL-nkuA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-23 11:58   ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-23 12:15     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-23 12:35       ` David Laight
2012-08-23 12:51         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-23 12:37       ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-23 12:49         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-24 12:17           ` Alex Bergmann
2012-08-24 17:42           ` David Miller
2012-08-25  8:48             ` Alexander Bergmann
2012-08-25  9:01               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-28  8:44               ` Carsten Wolff
     [not found]                 ` <1346414260.2591.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
2012-08-31 12:48                   ` Alexander Bergmann
2012-08-31 13:25                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-31 19:42                       ` David Miller
2012-08-31 19:47                         ` David Miller
2012-08-29  4:34               ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2012-08-29  8:51                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-29 17:25                   ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2012-08-30 13:12                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-30 16:45                       ` David Miller
2012-08-30 18:04                         ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2012-08-30 17:59                       ` H.K. Jerry Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFbMe2N-Ag_tUnHCr1=cJJmC4FTfXVJumn2Bk-oVfxuBoSCGrQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hkjerry.chu@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@linlab.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkchu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).