From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7715BC2D0DB for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCA2206F0 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="TMfOq3Cm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727579AbgA3WvC (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:51:02 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:43054 "EHLO mail-pg1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726294AbgA3WvC (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:51:02 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id u131so2395030pgc.10 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:51:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Nm7q/eqnnGMhJ4cSfabctzSKxn0MOorqNV0sKFngedQ=; b=TMfOq3Cm7tFFkVWajkEH/mOlfghX4QyLqQHqYZZWR4V20ArmjrlHpz0d8+8xSByinZ hdNbCAldYk6XW/2l4H6+W+D99nfYFDFdlo1JF1zsEkJxE9vw/m1xetfRlk4B1wB04LUf vgQJJnXFxYGn+sGKkA8pUh58KRPmTHCO35p+LwSV7Wkci1t0zGgCnSKFVsD3CJRVFyCo Hx7zchW0IfdwQSjwaOeDPLPmvT/qzRZbY0PFmpfI+3jsVs5e+ZwXMFUc5OJY345A6bMq pB48aI/3uWmIP/mXK6bLsZAtTLERYf85LGN/IzjM9ZEQtYWVvQ1wOCqgnYJxKRvVLiz2 DaBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nm7q/eqnnGMhJ4cSfabctzSKxn0MOorqNV0sKFngedQ=; b=TBGGFUIez4Hf/PSatalhPmBGUeO0SalvSVSsmI2B1xb8nPRVU6CTqS9zdvQ6g2/dt+ TuuICPt3wbqUJxWXhDdnjQbLG1x/AFuWSusvoXsUbaH/7ZqIOpZG7mphFyKtGgZdMgTs txf20Le7eixahNZ+Ei2Un69oXjQsl3X/n3yCfLLEVGbwsVVOWl7ENPzQ1w1qmlZTooa6 tx4y56pGdXyh3AW61L0J/aCrz+Sfkgt+oayPrAf6EmF1RxNWEytL6MZe7NbPZm3wuuaN elIrLIEETASmXjXStQ1otyKYi1zHcoNw8kualeGMf1VabrBnv5/ZwdZiS3Rmq7aslbX7 CskA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUBISqCWKKW+lgT6cf3+k9iur/30NwiTI+SW4Y/f5KLXast6NLM p4cj+xqWVwYL7zlLUW4x+DtxCsQsVwiaXmkcLRIr6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0i4HutGZ0NwffQW6YWyeSX4LgIJj846OBe2RwSGkQlJX/8HwMxqcna9y1bwf7blHqEu8eaWZyufGuXP7EBl4= X-Received: by 2002:a63:597:: with SMTP id 145mr6755667pgf.384.1580424659726; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:50:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200128072002.79250-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20200128072002.79250-5-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20200129063836.6C2A62064C@mail.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200129063836.6C2A62064C@mail.kernel.org> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:50:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] init: main: add KUnit to kernel init To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Maguire , Anton Ivanov , Arnd Bergmann , David Gow , Frank Rowand , Jeff Dike , Kees Cook , Richard Weinberger , rppt@linux.ibm.com, Shuah Khan , Iurii Zaikin , Greg KH , Logan Gunthorpe , Luis Chamberlain , Knut Omang , linux-um , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , KUnit Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:38 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2020-01-27 23:19:59) > > Remove KUnit from init calls entirely, instead call directly from > > kernel_init(). > > > > Co-developed-by: Alan Maguire > > Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > > Although, why can't it be squashed with the previous patch? I think that this is pretty much the smallest logical change that doesn't touch just KUnit. I figured it might make it easier for people not interested in KUnit what changes I am making to init. I assume that people don't touch init willy-nilly, right?