From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B995AC3524D for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFEE2087E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="QOo3HD1v" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727578AbgBDTfm (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:35:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:41468 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727541AbgBDTfm (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:35:42 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id l3so6067353pgi.8 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:35:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZBYf/F2Io0atf7tGD69pezEGXYzc+ynKJmxs01qZzAA=; b=QOo3HD1vuYYlz+4sD+zhB2tClXMUNBEVMlO7WB2JZ9IV9rmn7SF/rbwkwtEq2KhqH6 JflMkH64e2XW0chioVXoRklQSjZ1ThVCqfFd4QNQZvy3cCKTKktltJOOJYcsi+dOXsiA xyKnNbIPPvpQIbEox4KqyaNXHcxW2y550fV9m69L6uSplE435tmpgX9LGNn5cxycQCX2 WnL4rVBZyAfqQEJjgaX6r9LnrYU1cW8yz106G9HwDqFdmwyb5weFPXRl0cmTQUDEgiOT IuHegvLBA08oEM5t1e51IBhTgVFYRvE/0qHfcPD02u5/ihsaye3NxsNp4XwMhOnq9rty pXjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZBYf/F2Io0atf7tGD69pezEGXYzc+ynKJmxs01qZzAA=; b=FWzRhPMKa8kdjYkR0DTt4s2VuKYMV4FoZX2Q3w2ao8Ob9rsFN6HpatKc36jxb6d9hz gnF4211xyic4r+RgZ3FH8k0ihZKrjQ7OHQFBFEVw8FL0pm6dNvSh1hBcUcFbZdRXdl2l 7ibuyQ7Naj1f/JCpTkO5mWMjehxC7XgZlFy2o5ssFTVAK09vl5kFrZUlRB9ccKos3soD yUf0OsL1NiuEyLL84h/L/jEMLXJb8jGGcZKCqVHbJHhEreHSTL/7umPw/qj9l3KyrpkS GLtXmLI4dGeuqaYgxeLNIYuMeklvp3ndptzHZ5vkT/OBBIs3CUNaK5JdLqanwtVt4lxo 2EIw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXe/0ZHxi9PmotFvwcfM0OQVJiQ2NtrRLSGqXYR03h9yELs/y3y /GS5e36+ixQYeFDWp+b7DKiofqn5+r2WvUCMph6W7w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4q+KWhmmtYLJvBYiGMg4pK4goKHR2pzDq2KQ/ueAn46fzf63AjOWVV2VKJzLV/wvMXo/IxMlPJ94Rwb3Ob+8= X-Received: by 2002:a63:3754:: with SMTP id g20mr17958855pgn.384.1580844941362; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:35:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200130230812.142642-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20200204071915.AF32B21582@mail.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200204071915.AF32B21582@mail.kernel.org> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:35:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] kunit: create a centralized executor to dispatch all KUnit tests To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Maguire , Anton Ivanov , Arnd Bergmann , David Gow , Frank Rowand , Jeff Dike , Kees Cook , Richard Weinberger , rppt@linux.ibm.com, Shuah Khan , Iurii Zaikin , Greg KH , Logan Gunthorpe , Luis Chamberlain , Knut Omang , linux-um , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , KUnit Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:19 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2020-01-30 15:08:05) > > ## TL;DR > > > > This patchset adds a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than > > relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately along > > with a couple of new features that depend on it. > > Is there any diff from v1 to v2? I don't know what changed, but I see > that my Reviewed-by tag has been put on everything, so I guess > everything I said was addressed or discussed in the previous round. Oh yes, sorry about that. I have gotten a bit lazy in regard to changing logs. I noticed that a lot of people don't seem to care. I'll make a note that you do. Changes since last revision: - On patch 6/7, I flipped the include order and removed braces from the if statements. - On patch 7/7, I removed the periods from the short descriptions.